Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qa'dir Vyrotek
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SoftHiss (talk | contribs) at 15:28, 18 February 2020 (Prevent error tracking). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 15:28, 18 February 2020 by SoftHiss (talk | contribs) (Prevent error tracking)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Qa'dir Vyrotek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a musician that is not yet there perhaps and is therefore promotional. The only obvious claim to notability (often regarded as one of the best indie films of the 2012 summer) is sourced to a press release. The rest of the references are repetitive, not reliable or not enough to establish real notability. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see the 5th best new rapper of 2012--TheMaclin (talk) 23:37, 20 September 2013 (UTC)TheMaclin[reply]
- Keep - Here are more sources [1] [2] [3] --TheMaclin (talk) 02:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)themaclin[reply]
- ^ Maclin, Rick (12 September 2012). "Justin Bieber, Vyrotek, And One Direction Talk Grammy Snubs". Top 40 Charts. New York, New York: Top40. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- ^ "MME Interviews Vyrotek On New Album; Vyrotek Promises Revival Of RapRock". Top 40. New York, New York: Top 40 charts. 12 December 2013.
{{cite web}}:|first=missing|last=(help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ http://www.top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=78854
- comment - For the repetitious part, the title's are the same, but the sites are totally different.--TheMaclin (talk) 02:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)TheMaclin[reply]
- Keep - Wouldn't MTV be a source for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMaclin (talk • contribs) 02:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - More sources http://top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=84820 http://top40-charts.com/news.php?nid=84965 --68.81.118.197 (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)TheMaclin[reply]
- Delete. A PR piece sourced by PR pieces. The MTV hosted bio is not by them. The Massive Music Entertainment claim is sourced to a PR release not to MME, which shows no sign of being a credible publication (2 Facebook likes!). He lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I looked that up too, I do not think that that's an official page as MME has not been around since 2006.
- Delete - No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.