Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lithuania
New topic - new section please. It would be much easier to communicate and not mix things.
Lithuania-myth-stub
IMO it is needed, because there are about 50-60 stubs, that in my opiniuon are deadends, and now they clog up Lithuania-stub place, and are only relatively related to it.--Lokyz 14:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one thing... I really believe all those stubs should be merged into one article/list because 95% of them are destined to be stubs forever (just there is no info about those reconstructed deities) and all of them have dubious claims. It would be much easier to find out any wrong statements in one big list than in 60 sub-stubs.
- If merged, mythology stub is not needed. Renata 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Collaboration of the week
is it needed, will someone participate?--Lokyz 14:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I believe it's a bit too early for that. First, let's get the whole project up and going. It's a good idea, but now right now and right here. Let's better think what is needed for the project to become alive? Here are some thoughts:
- Category tree to explain/plan future categories
- Article index - list of all existing articles about Lithuania and what needs to be done to them; at the same time articles could be assessed (stub-ok-featured; not important-very important). I might attempt to compile the list of articles (more or less from my watchlist)
- Article talk template - "this article is part of WikiProject Lithuania" (btw, P in wikiproject is capitalized)
- Compilation of missing articles
- Comprehensive resource page
- That's just some basic ideas. Renata 17:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- also adding on going votes related with LT M.K.
So this is next step:) Anyone should free to edit/make this page structure better. For now it is as programmer call it - in early alpha. Altoug, I do have feeling it could become tool.
- sorry I still not see vote issue, could you please point me directly; I do not find it :)M.K.
- Discussions ... - if you need a separate section for vote add it, altough, IMO it would seem as a conspiracy untill this page is not official. We could mark this feature as a will be enabled out of beta. Would this satisfy you? because i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.--Lokyz 21:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- eee... I mean to notify editors which article related with LT is going a vote procedures like Jogaila was and etc. i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before. -sorry but I did not recall this your statement, maybe I missed some issues...M.K. 21:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Discussions ... - if you need a separate section for vote add it, altough, IMO it would seem as a conspiracy untill this page is not official. We could mark this feature as a will be enabled out of beta. Would this satisfy you? because i'm not so eager to vote, I've stated it before.--Lokyz 21:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Category
Should we add [[Category:Lithuania]] (or any othe category) to this, to be accessible by more editors or should we wait?--Lokyz 22:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- There are many other things to do first. Renata 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Tasks for the weekend
So, let's decide what we are going to do over the weekend.
First, I think, we need to decide if we want to do article assesment on quality (see, for example, {{Grading scheme}}) and/or importance. See for example existing template on Talk:Audrys Cardinal Bačkis. Should we have one like that? If so, start developing rating standards, rating template, categories, etc.
Second, start compiling a list of missing articles. Start with really important ones.
Third, since Lokyz seems to be the most involved with categories, you could make some sort of category tree to show existing categories and categories that might be needed. (btw, to link a category, you should put : in front of the word category. example: category:Lithuania) Renata 11:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- The category tree is quite simple - you might explore it through category:Lithuania and it's subcategories and sub sub categories. I've made some changes, to make it similar to other coutries categories. IMO this is about enough, just some explanation is needed, and I might even write it in some time. They're quite easy to create - no request is needed.
- Asessment is good thing, just IMO it's a bit early to think about it. Importance - yes, it would be really helpfull, also template indicating that this article belongs to WP:LIT is good thing (or should we wait untill this WP will get official status?).
- I just dunno how much time i'll have on weekend, so can't promise alot, but I hope I'll participate.--Lokyz 12:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)