Crzrussian
Archives of Old Comments:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 (incl. recall), 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Congrats and more
Hey Crz, congrats on becoming an admin again. Sorry for the A-Team joke on the page, I couldn't resist ;-). I have a question for you. As I understand, you are a law student, and I'd like to know, what do you think about the {{PD-Soviet}}? Is there any law school magic you can use, to either convince me of the case against it or provide some legal defence for it? Regards, DVD+ R/W 01:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I guess my role in this is mostly as a reader. I think there are lots of really good historical and encyclopedic images at stake (at stake because the template has now been deleted at the Commons). Though the appended text makes some sense to me, I don't know enough to understand the cases or provide alternatives. I am a bit worried that this template has been prosecuted in a way here, and is being acted against without a defence in legal terms. DVD+ R/W 01:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
you're back!
[1] No you didn't. See also support #39. ;) – Chacor 07:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Not Guilty
Oh - lol. I was "zombie editing." Hope you are well. --DavidShankBone 15:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Haha, i guess i will be saying hello to alot of ppl this holiday! Kol tov. David Betesh
Looks to me like too many of us spent a bunch of our school years studying a dead language. Carthago delenda est!! (Now if only I'd learned Spanish, would have been a lot more useful.) -- Fan-1967 20:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Mr.Crz Russian
hey man...u seem cool. i actually have to be a russian guy for model u.n but my site was just a story about real people. real people who do fictional things. it has a small fanbase and i would just like to know exactly why i got deleted?
Touch up on photo
Hi Crzrussian!
Sorry for taking so long - final exams in three weeks! Here are two edits, sorry if you were expected an amazing transformation - the original (if you don't mind me saying so) was too poor to do much). Personally I much rather the BW version. Image:Crzrussian 2001 bw.jpg, Image:Crzrussian 2001 edit.jpg. If you just want a straight touch up of the original in the parts you described I can do that as well. --Fir0002 09:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Congrats
Sorry for the belated congrats, but excellent work on RfA 2. Goodluck with everything. Yanksox 14:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Nixer
Note that he moved Sanhedrin to Synedrion (Judea) anyway. See talk page there for what I have done. --Daniel575 | (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Ponedelnik.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ponedelnik.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey
Just saw the belated congrats. Thanks man! Last exam ever... relieved to be done with it. Hope adminship redux is treating you well -- Samir धर्म 22:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Until Fritzbot reminded me, I had forgotten that I had uploaded a .png as well as a .jpg, so the latter becomes unnecessary. You may want to do the honors of deletion. AnonEMouse (squeak) 12:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
shortpages
I noticed you added stuff to a couple pages I protected to keep them out of shortpages - should I be doing that always? Sounds like it could be a feature request for the mediawiki software, to keep articles with that template out of shortpages. Either that, or we should be subst'ing that template. --Aguerriero (talk) 14:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay.. so I'll just remember to add <!-- NewYorkYankeesSuckNewYorkYankeesSuckNewYorkYankeesSuck --> to each one... --Aguerriero (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? Yeesh. --Aguerriero (talk) 15:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
If you check the history of the above article, you will find some versions that attack people and should probably be deleted to prevent reversion. Would you mind deleting some of those edits so that non-admins would not even know about them? Cheers. youngamerican (yo) 17:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Ilan Manulis
Thanks for the heads up on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilan Manulis. Closure on an issue is always nice.
And congrats on returning to the ranks of the admins... Williamborg (Bill) 17:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I have to compliment you on your professionalism and politeness. Let me also alert you to the fact that I made my original edit to St. John's University School of Law as part of a larger mission of editing all the law school pages in New York, adding those categories. I still think that the categories should apply but it seems I have lost this argument. perhaps the real solution is to remove the category for New York City law schools completely and have only the New York law schools category. --Cdogsimmons 21:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks (even if you opposed)
|
Thanks for your input in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. A word of constructive criticism always helps a person more than a person of support, and your constructive criticism on my RfA helped me realize my shortcomings and how I should improve on them. I will strive to correct such missteps and answer your concerns voiced on my RfA. With humility, 210physicq (c) 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
+Anima prod
In regards to your prod of the +Anima article, it's a 10 volume book series with international publication. How is the notability or importance here even questionable? (Please note that we have no notability guideline on books at present, and the current book proposal explicitly does not cover comics.)
And no, I'm not a series fanboy, I've never read the thing. --tjstrf 05:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
editing etiquette
Hi, Just to clarify, did you think I was in some way unprofessional? I referred to it as a Low level category deletion edit war because it was the second time I personally added the category and had it removed after someone else (User:PreferenceSeries) had also added it twice and had his edits reverted twice. Thanks again for your help.--Cdogsimmons 14:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)