Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woods Theatre
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Coredesat (talk | contribs) at 00:54, 11 November 2006 (→[[Woods Theatre]]: close, no consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 00:54, 11 November 2006 by Coredesat (talk | contribs) (→[[Woods Theatre]]: close, no consensus)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 00:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN defunct movie theater, no sources, could be OR - crz crztalk 16:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added a source, and I found several items related to the theater (which was once a live theater, and later a "movie palace") at ebay. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Woods+Theatre%22+site%3Aebay.com Big downtown theaters such as this one were designed to impress, so that many were architecturally notable. The fact that the building no longer exists shouldn't detract from the fact that it played a significant role in live and filmed entertainment in Chicago for many years. Once notable, always notable. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Truthbringertoronto. Appears to have an interesting history. Kavadi carrier 01:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep yeah keep it, it has a (pretty average yet existent) source †he Bread 23:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It may have an interesting history, but it is non-notable. It's no Biograph, which is on the national register and is where Dillinger was shot. No sources citing notability for architecture, news events, or anything else. One of hundreds of old "interesting" buildings demolished every year. --Aguerriero (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Aguerriero, it may have existed, but it seems nothing about it really stands out. Yanksox 00:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.