Talk:LegalMatch
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. |
The CEO and founder of LegalMatch plead guilty in 2004 to the felony of illegally accessing into the voicemail system of a competitor. This event was reported in several new articles and blogs. The latest news article to reference this was in the San Francisco Business Times from the January 20, 2006 edition. Please see http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2006/01/23/newscolumn7.html?from_rss=1.
"Stealing trade secrets"?
What is the source for the "stealing trade secrets" allegation? I've removed it temporarily. Note that I can't access the Forbes source. AndyJones 09:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's in the Forbes article (which can be read with a free account, like New York Times articles). It states '“theft and use of trade secrets,”'; my guess is that LegalMatch alleges mr. Wells took the trade secrets with him to CasePost and started recruiting their personnel. AFAIK in the US the court records containing their complaints are public, so perhaps they will pop up in google later.
I was kind of tired when editing this, I guess that's why I typed CasePoint instead of CasePost a number of times. I restored the link to the joint press release on the CasePost site, that link is there is to 'prove' it was a joint press release. If it's too expansive, consider linking both versions on the same line. Tinus 20:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
Editing by 67.119.122.102
If people are monitoring this article, they might want to keep a close eye towards 67.119.122.102 (talk · contribs), who has been removing references, adding POV, and adding (alleged) linkspam on other articles. Tinus 17:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
News
This interesting press release was added, kind of a bad reference but still informational Tinus 01:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Article is not neutral
The majority of this article looks like self-promotion. Despite the newsworthiness of the company due to negative press, the article needs to be edited to comply with neutrality guidelines or deleted. Stanley, 19 June 2006.
- It's not likely to be deleted. I proposed it for deletion and it got kept. I'd approve of a substantial rewrite, though, if you want to start on one. AndyJones 17:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Deleted several unsupported sentences that looked more like advertising as opposed to having an objective tone. Stanley, 24 October 2006
Somebody is deleting the news articles that made this article relevant in the first place. Reinstated articles. If the news related to this article is deleted so should the article.