Talk:Maslow's hierarchy of needs

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 00:58, 22 May 2020 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Maslow's hierarchy of needs/Archive 6) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2604:2000:1483:694:4968:80BF:331:94DD in topic typo in the pyramid infographic

WikiProject iconPsychology C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WAP assignment

Motivational Theory

There has been a lot of argument as to the credibility or lack thereof, for this theory. However although unintended for management theories for motivation by Maslow; in practical terms if there is a manager with a small team of deflated workers, it's a little start, a 'so basic it might just help' theory that when a manager, whose head is full of figures and responsibilities that are so far away from the likes of arguments of principals and credibilities or science versus pyscho-babble, that when that manager thinks yes that might help! I'll put a drinks vendor in the office, or i'll put a security light up just by the exit where some workers stand at night waiting to be picked up, or lets have one to ones to address peoples goals, then that is when something as incorrect or not may just make that bit of a difference to peoples spirits, maybe even just for one day, but it could just add a bit of warmth to a usually cold, mundane place. That in that sense may just turn out to be more important to those people than even whether the earth go round the sun. On that day at least!

I apologize if I'm completely missing something here, but I wonder, how is the Energy Hierarchy article link relevant in the "See also" section of an article about Maslow's theory of hierarchy of needs?

Blackfoot?

Apparently there are allegations that Maslow based the hierarchy on the beliefs of the Blackfoot people, with whom he spent much time and to whom he gave no credit.

http://mmiwontario.ca/images/Maslow%E2%80%99s%20Hierarchy%20Connected%20to%20Blackfoot%20Beliefs.pdf

for example

How should this be presented within the article, if at all? DS (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bump! I just recently learned this too. It should definitely be represented here. bse3 (talk · contribs · count · logs) 20:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

so called "attachment theory"

HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!

"attachment theory has since been extended to provide explanations of nearly all the human needs in Maslow's hierarchy, from sustenance and mating to group membership and justice.[19]"

If that were so, wouldn't it have at least one word of explanation and so forth?? Please correct.
----2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:A98E:B629:4FB:D8CA (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)SillyMeReply

The references used here do not even support the connection to the topic, so I've removed it entirely. Iikigaii (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

typo in the pyramid infographic

The text embedded within the infographic says "physiolgical" instead of "physiological". Noting it here since I don't know how to fix it. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maslow%27s_Hierarchy_of_Needs.jpg says I can't overwrite it. --2604:2000:1483:694:4968:80BF:331:94DD (talk) 16:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply