Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Memory-Mapped Database
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 331dot (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 20 October 2014 (Reverted 1 edit by 65.190.35.213 (talk) to last revision by JohnCD. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 14:04, 20 October 2014 by 331dot (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 edit by 65.190.35.213 (talk) to last revision by JohnCD. (TW))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lightning Memory-Mapped Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe that, for [Lightning Memory-Mapped Database], notability has not been established by references to reliable sources. Of the six citations, four appear to be from the product's producer, one (from Google) does not mention the product, and one (from Zimbra) is just a wiki page. The Lightning Database looks like a wonderful product with prospects for great success, but it hasn't achieved that yet. See WP:NN. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 18:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cameron11598 (Converse) 20:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- peter, such a request from you, who worked years for one database manufacturer, namely oracle / mysql, might be perceived of having a conflict of interest. --ThurnerRupert (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I cannot find significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I couldn't find any reliable sources for this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 02:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.