Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of image processing software
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) at 13:36, 25 October 2012 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 13:36, 25 October 2012 by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of image processing software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page contains no actual discussion, has a cherry-picked and unexplained list of features, and only lists three software packages out of at least dozens (and possibly hundreds) in use.} Thouis.r.jones (talk) 16:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This comparison doesn't make sense -- many of these "functionalities" are similar or variations of more general algorithms. Most of them can be easily implemented in Python, Matlab and a multitude of other programs. Perhaps merge part of the list to image processing, or move it to list of image processing algorithms or some similarly named page. kml (talk)
- Delete Not a subject, the supposed "subject" is an action taken on three selected softwares. So also no indication of wp:notability for the "subject" North8000 (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.