Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corn programming language
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shanel (talk | contribs) at 07:42, 14 March 2006 (close discussion: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 07:42, 14 March 2006 by Shanel (talk | contribs) (close discussion: delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 07:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is not notable and, to judge from the webpage (complete with a FAA--'Frequently Answered Answers'), probably a hoax. The article that links to it, for its creator (Dariusz Jablonowski), is also an AfD (a few above) Bucketsofg 21:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn or hoax. dbtfztalk 22:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable programming language. We created new languages in Programming Languages and Compilers 101 too. Worth an article some day if actually used by a number of other people, most languages never get there. Weregerbil 23:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unremarkable. -- Krash (Talk) 01:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on principle as it cannot prove it has any external users. The language is real, reminds me a little bit Erlang programming language but until it gets adopted outside the author it is not encyclopedia notable. 99% of programming languages fails to attract any attention in the harsh world and no attention means no ability to maintain the article. Pavel Vozenilek 22:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn, certainly not revolutionary unless you've never heard of functional programming. One thread on comp.programming that was crossposted a handful of places[1]. kotepho 10:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.