Talk:Rigsby sisters

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.60.0.169 (talk) at 01:53, 22 March 2007 (POV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 18 years ago by TedFrank in topic POV

POV

What about the illegal activity exposed by the documents?

This article is an entirely one-sided ad for the Scruggs law firm, and there is no discussion of the order to show cause why the Rigsby Sisters should not be held in contempt for violating a court order regarding documents they illegally stole.[1][2] -- TedFrank 23:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply