Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multimedia Applications Development Environment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. This is a very strange case, as most of the non-anonymous comments have remarked during the discussion. Other AfDs are frequently closed "with no prejudice against recreating a valid article", and in this case I'll take the opposite view. If there's actually something wrong with this article, there's no prejudice against nominating it in a non-disruptive manner. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia Applications Development Environment

This article should be deleted for two reasons: 1. It is not notable. 2. It has not had any edits in 2006. I noticed a mistake in the article, and fixed it, without even checking the last time it was edited. Please delete the article, then re-create it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jc iindyysgvxc (talk • contribs).

Comment-I am not knowledgable enough on the subject matter to confirm or deny notability, but not having edits in a given year is not criteria for deletion. You never know, we might have some articles that are already exhaustive and perfect that everybody agrees on!--Xnuala (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep because one of the reason for getting rid of this article is a very week agurment so it has not be edited since 06 so what some articles have not been edited in the past few years so not a good reason to get rid of itOo7565 21:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. --Emperor Walter Humala · ^{( talk? · help! )} 05:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: I want it deleted now! Infact, I want the article deleted and re-created! This template must be substituted.
- I suspect this IP user is the same person as Jc iindyysgvxc. A check of their contribution histories reveals that most of their edits are to this AFD, Shigechiyo Izumi, articles related to Mario Party, and articles related to oldest people. Also, there is the same request for deletion and subsequent recreation. -- Black Falcon 20:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Umm ... Keep?. I'm really confused by this nomination. Why would we want to delete an article only to immediately recreate it? -- Black Falcon 20:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because of how long it took to edit it, of course! 58.168.203.124 06:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like the article. It is no good. It has to be deleted! Jc iindyysgvxc 11:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article was not edited in 2006, so there! That is a very good reason for getting rid of this article! Not only that, but the information is not notable! Do we really need an article about a hardly-understandable game engine? Jc iindyysgvxc 11:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just so you know, this discussion is not over.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.