Talk:Leo J. Ryan Federal Building

Please use the archive parameter to specify the number of the next free peer review page, or replace {{Peer review}} on this page with {{subst:PR}} to find the next free page automatically.

	Leo J. Ryan Federal Building has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 27, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 3, 2007.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leo J. Ryan Federal Building article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. California GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Review note

Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

  Review: this article is being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).Trishm 11:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC) I have passed this article as it appears to meet the Good Article criteria. Nice job. Further improvements would be polishing the prose to 'sparkling' - adding details and using phrases that allow you to visualise or otherwise become connected to the building. A peer review may be the next step.Reply

Well done! Trishm 12:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

• Thank you so much! I will work on the prose, and then after that is done post for a Peer Review. Smee 12:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

• • Good job Smee! Anonymous Dissident ^Utter 02:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply