User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive6
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
- Welcome!
Hello The Rogue Penguin/Archive6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial* How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 19:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Help! Mayday!
I'm hoping you can help me -- I've got a formatting problem I can't figure out how to fix with the List of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex episodes article. Some time ago the article was altered into a table. Whoever did this, however, did something wrong. There are images in the article, but not one of them is showin! They're there, in the coding, but they are not showing. This has resulted in virtually every image in the article being declared orpahaned and have been put up for deletion. I experimented in the sandbox with it, but I have not been able to figure out how to fix the problem. HELP! --Jason Palpatine 13:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The template won't display images, and they're not supposed to be there anyway. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 17:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- To elaborate, episode images have been determined to fail fair use guidelines. –Gunslinger47 17:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- News to me. --Jason Palpatine 17:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- To elaborate, episode images have been determined to fail fair use guidelines. –Gunslinger47 17:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Just thought you should know, I have put all the images in the article up for deletion. --Jason Palpatine 16:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Images
Hello. Why did you remove the images in List of characters in Ben 10? And whatever happened to all of the previous discussions? Dylan Damien 15:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:DreigenUchiha.jpg
This is taking forever to process: Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 April 26#Image:DreigenUchiha.jpg. I'm 100% certain this is copyvio, but I can't find the source to speedy it. If you go to the uploader's webpage ( www.clashoftheshinobi.com ) you can see the larger image in the "Clash of Shinobi Logo". All the rest of his uploads been deleted, but this one is still around. Any suggestions? –Gunslinger47 22:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Advice request
Ok. I'm asking your input. Considering everything that was said in the earlier debate we had, you and the others cited several policies in Wikipedia to explain to me the reasons for the overhauling of the Ben 10 series articles. It was pointed out in the discussion, that it is (I understand) the prevailing view that this should be done to the many other such episodic articles here I referenced. If this is the case, perhaps I should also start working with you guys in the same direction -- would that be alright with you? My real objection in the case of Ben 10, is that is is uniqe here. Many of the other such listed series have a seperate Wik site set up for each of them, like Star Trek and Stargate SG-1. Given that these other shows have dedicated specialized Wik sites, I never saw any need for such extesivism here in the general Wikipedia. What I want to know is if it would be proper or not for me to even suggest acting in these areas along the same lines? Or should I keep my mouth shut and hands off? Your advice would be VERY appreciated. Sincerly; Jason Palpatine 07:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- You could if you wanted to, but I don't really see the point. It's something off-this-Wiki that you'd have to do yourself. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- You "don't really see the point"? You are -- IMHO -- one of the best and most knowlegeable admins here. If that is what you mean. OTOH -- if you mean my inkling to put up for discussion aplying the policies that were implemented with BEN 10 elsewhere here. I am not -- as our earlier discussions show -- in your league. I just didn't want to step up to homeplate and make a fool of myself before everyone here. Thanks. I'll work on a proposal and post it at the appropriate talk page. Whith your permission, I'll notify you here when I do. May be a while though, I am going on a business trip next week. -- Jason Palpatine 10:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, just so we're clear on that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 16:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- You sure fooled me. Your inside-knowledge of Wikipedia's workings made a good impression. Sure had me fooled. --Jason Palpatine 17:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Prove it
Prove that that naruto hurricane chronicles is coming to the US next year from a website to see where u got your data otherwise it is fake and what u r doing is vadleism for say lies about shoen jump that they have not announced.
U need to stop belveing evering on the internet.what u r reading might not be real.
Deleting People's Posts
The WP:Etiquette Rules forbide you from deleting other people's posts, especially in the Village Pump forum, and especially when you have not contacted them first. Please assume Good Faith and don't just delete people randomly. You are not an administrator and you did not even ask for a consensus on the issue. SanchiTachi 00:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thats not your place to decide if something is in the wrong group. It is watched by administrators who determine such things. It is not your right, as editors are only allowed to delete things only if it is vandalism. You are not assuming good faith. SanchiTachi 00:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, you must always assume good faith. Please restore the edit or I will have to recommend you for administrative review. If you would like to refactor the talk page, you could, but you must follow the guidelines. You do not have the right to just delete such topics, especially when it discusses the aspects of NPOV. The Village Pump is designed for open discussion on topics affecting Wikipedia. I believe it was the intent of the author to do such as that. You do not have the right to edit such things out. Please respect that poster and immediately return the content, or I will be forced to revert you for vandalizing the page and then put up your editings for vandalism review also. Please read Wikipedia:Avoiding_common_mistakes "Deleting or removing text from any Talk page without archiving it, except in your userspace."SanchiTachi 00:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Avoiding_common_mistakes "Deleting or removing text from any Talk page without archiving it, except in your userspace. " Please respect WikiEtiquette. Your edits are vandalism, because you are deleting without having the right to delete. Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments "Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments "In general, editing others' comments is not allowed. Exceptions are:" Your deletion does not fall under any of the exceptions and is vandalism. "Blanking - Removing all or significant parts of pages, or replacing entire established pages with one's own version without first gaining consensus. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. An example of blanking edits that could be legitimate would be edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and non-biased information on the living, and this may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, uw-test1 or uw-delete1, as appropriate, should normally be used as initial warnings for ordinary content removals not involving any circumstances that would merit stronger warnings." Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_vandalism_is_not SanchiTachi 01:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
You have a strange inability to follow: Wikipedia:Etiquette#Principles_of_Wikipedia_etiquette "Though editing articles is acceptable (and, in fact, encouraged), editing the signed words of another editor on a talk page or other discussion page is generally not acceptable" SanchiTachi 02:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Code Lyoko episode summaries
I'm sorry to contact you like this, but I'm not a wikipedia user and I don't know who else to ask. Your name seemed associated with a lot of edits to Code Lyoko and I thought you might know - why have the synopses of the Lyoko episodes been removed? I thought they were great. (I mean the complete recaps, not the short overviews still there.) All the episode pages are now on redirect. As I say, sorry to be a nuisance if this isn't the correct way to contact you, or if you're not the right person. Just thought you might know more than me.203.26.122.12 06:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I'll answer for him. Some weirdo who calls himself TTN deleted all of the summaries - heck the articles associated with them - with no consensus or approval to do so. He claims to follow WP:EPISODE and feels it is his right to do so. Angie Y. 23:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Help Please
Im trying to make my own userpage. How do u get the userboxes on the side?Itachi627 22:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Suigetsu image
Someguy, the "Oh" is competelu useless and takes up space, and makes the image uselessy large. Please do not continue to make this useless edit or make a statement on Countmaal's talk page (thats me, I just dont feel like logging in) about why the "Oh" is so important. --24.56.197.128 00:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Categories for redirects
Good day. It appears that you were one whom was against categorizing redirects, is that correct? Currently, there is still an an going arguement of it between I and another user. I suggested to another person named Piemanmoo that redirects targeted to a list should continue uncategorized, unless they abide by this and this only. Your thoughts? DC&Marvel maniac 16:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I may be wrong, there are other guideline-by-type articles that discuss when fictional-related categories should be utilized for redirected articles. Are there not? DC&Marvel maniac 16:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I suggested on that talk page a survey by power of consensus should get this categories for redirects agitation solved and settled. Agreeable? DC&Marvel maniac 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Do you find a poll susceptible? I am rather baffled by the number of discussions on the subject. Are there more opposing, or supporting? DC&Marvel maniac 18:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I suggested on that talk page a survey by power of consensus should get this categories for redirects agitation solved and settled. Agreeable? DC&Marvel maniac 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Get facts right
Get it right & stop editing everything that you a narutard who probably started watching naruto after it started on Cartoon network. You cannot really put her becoming a chuunin in abilities, yes it does tell how good she has become to make a chuunin level ninja but it isnt her abilities. So yea, do learn shit & manga> anime & filler should count & have its own section.
Please get laid. Danthoni kuda nee amma gudha nakku, tarvatha nee mardal ki poi nee muudi lo oka veedi ladak petu manu.
Think, why is it called "filler". It is used to help get the manga further ahead so they have mo material to work with. OMG, I want shippudent episode 15-20, do you know where I can find them? lol
Image:Gaara.jpg
Some interesting people leave messages for you on your talk page. :-}
Anyway, do you know what episode this actually comes from?[1] I tried finding it myself, without luck. –Gunslinger47 05:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Gaara.jpg&diff=104020680&oldid=78035711){kind=link}
- It's around that number. To be honest, I just sorta guessed at it for the image. Gaara's position limits the possible choices. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm… I usually don't have trouble finding these things. –Gunslinger47 05:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, it's 48. Should be at least. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I thought so too at first, but the background is off. I'll keep looking later. –Gunslinger47 06:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Can redirects have their own categories?
I believe we've spoken once or twice before about something similar to this; Ichigo's proper speed category and things. I had noticed the discussion happening at Wikipedia talk:Redirect#Categories on redirects needs clarifying and, from what I can make of it, redirected articles are allowed to have categories; which would include the superhuman ones (if they are superhuman-related though). From what I can tell, there is no rule that does not approve — only a few users were not for it — You were one of them, and I think two-three others. Regardless, I don't see anything confusing about it. Should redirected characters, such as the Bleach, Dragon Ball, Naruto and other series characters have all the categories they need and more, or not? ~I'm anonymous
- Would you do the same? ~I'm anonymous
- I see. I'm for it all the way then if there is no opposition, at least from a wealthy contributor as you. Here is what I'll do: I will categorize every character that is/can redirect to a list or article. It would be great if you could help though; if you feel that uneasy about it then I don't mind. I'll start with the Dragon Ball and Bleach character redirects. I'll work my way from there, perhaps I do Naruto (though I don't know much about it save for the dubs) and then the famous comics characters that are redirected. Your thoughts? ~I'm anonymous
- By important ones, I think I know what you're saying: Let's say, the redirected superhero names or pseudynoms or aliases - The Great Saiyaman and Great Saiyaman will have the superhuman categories the Son Gohan article has, but not the child superhero cat., etc. Queen Maxima will have Maxima's categories which relate more to her "queen" title, instead of sharing all of Maxima's cats. That about right? ~I'm anonymous
- Thanks again. Hope we can work together in the near future. {^_^} ~I'm anonymous
- By important ones, I think I know what you're saying: Let's say, the redirected superhero names or pseudynoms or aliases - The Great Saiyaman and Great Saiyaman will have the superhuman categories the Son Gohan article has, but not the child superhero cat., etc. Queen Maxima will have Maxima's categories which relate more to her "queen" title, instead of sharing all of Maxima's cats. That about right? ~I'm anonymous
- I see. I'm for it all the way then if there is no opposition, at least from a wealthy contributor as you. Here is what I'll do: I will categorize every character that is/can redirect to a list or article. It would be great if you could help though; if you feel that uneasy about it then I don't mind. I'll start with the Dragon Ball and Bleach character redirects. I'll work my way from there, perhaps I do Naruto (though I don't know much about it save for the dubs) and then the famous comics characters that are redirected. Your thoughts? ~I'm anonymous
Gin
Not a big deal so I won't revert you, but yes, he is a commander. --tjstrf talk 23:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually I may be assuming that, but I remember Aizen calling Tosen by some big-shot title and Gin presumably holds at least the same authority since Aizen says he's always been his lieutenant. --tjstrf talk 00:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
NPOV
A source that is deemed unfit is not appropriate to be sourced in any circumstance.
Your rationale is wrong.
Furthermore, the Sun falls under legitimate publications for qualification under Wikipedia and the wiki page for the Sun even says that. Please stop violating NPOV and put the material back in. Those who are removing the material are being investigated on other pages, I would not want to join them in their crusade to spread misinformation. Thanks. SanchiTachi 01:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but saying someone was arrested is not a criticism and clearly does not fall under anything you have claimed. The information you removed was clearly unbiased and presented both groups (hell, it said that more opposition people were arrested than Marxist) as suffering the same condition. Furthermore, " It's a tabloid." does not make it a non-verifiable source, as tabloids in Canada and England present actual, legitimate information. They are called "tabloids" because they also present information on celebrities, which these are not the people that fall under such catagorization. However, your use of the claim that they are "tabloid" is highly suspicious and the same argument that the others have used. SanchiTachi 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
If you are going to pull out the "remove poorly sourced" rule, then please adhere to it: "Dorothy Jean O'Donnell, "Marxist-Leninists will empower Canadians" [editorial], National Post, 29 May 2004, A23." Editorials do not count as legitimate sources, but are unverifiable opinion pieces. "Citizen's Assembly on Electoral Reform: Presentation Summary, Lillooet Public Hearing, 16 June 2004, accessed 22 November 2006." A presentation does not count as a legitimate verifiable source. http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2004w42/msg00005.htm An email/personal website is not a legitimate verifiable source.
"Rodden (born 1980) is a political activist in Toronto, Ontario and student in equity studies at the University of Toronto." No information presented to back up this claim. "His candidacy in the 2004 and 2006 federal elections was managed by Shane Ruttle Martinez." No information presented to back up this claim. "He is the former general co-ordinator of Young Left, a revolutionary youth group in Toronto founded by former youth members of the Communist Party of Canada who left the party over organizational and political disagreements." This information is only sourced by an email posting/personal website and thus is not sourced properly. "Rodden himself was never a member of the Communist Party of Canada, and describes his politics as neo-Maoist" No source for this claim. "He is active with Anti-Racist Action in Toronto, the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, and the Canadian Friends of Soviet People, an organization which supports the re-establishment of the former Soviet Union and publishes the magazine Northstar Compass. " No source for this claim.
If you are removing unsourced/poorly sourced information, please prove it by removing the above. If you refuse to, then you have shown that you are not there to remove unsourced/poorly sourced information, but there to remove only one bit of information to promote a point of view. SanchiTachi 01:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- The reason why I am so short with you is that I have removed it. Please see the article Shane Ruttle Martinez which is currently in dispute. I removed things that violated BLP based on the BLP pages. The people who keep putting in the POV (which I have cited above) and removed the opposing POV (except when the same source is used to reinforce them) is reinserted. Please remove the Toronto Sun article from the other page if you feel that it is tabloid, as it is not appropriate (especially if there is another link already saying the information). Otherwise, you seem to be putting forth the same POV as the trouble makers are. Please understand the situation and how complicated/delicate it is. SanchiTachi 02:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- 1. "Dorothy Jean O'Donnell, " Your response on this point is not correct. Dorothy is not the topic of the article and just wrote an opinion piece that is not verifiable or allowed to talk about biographical information on the topic person (who is not Dorothy). 2. "Not so sure on this one. A fact tag might be appropriate." A fact tag should be put just about everywhere on many of the articles that deal with that topic. 3. "General information need not necessarily be sourced." Claiming registry in political parties needs to be sourced, because it is not "general knowledge" but something based on legal processes. This is clearly part of the verifiability rule, especially with such obscure people. SanchiTachi 02:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sanchi replied to your post so thoroughly. However, I must be overlooking the point where your question was answered. –Gunslinger47 02:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Please explain how someone's editorial counts as a source of information for them and doesn't get banned under Autobiographic, especially when its an editorial and not fact. It is not a reference. It would have to fall under "external links." If you cannot understand the difference, please look them up. It is also not a Soapbox so putting a citation to someone's editorial does not belong on Wikipedia. "party registry would presumably be public information (indeed, to run for any office would require public knowledge of it). Easy enough to look up" Then where is the source? Wikipedia is not a place to put unsourced information on Public figures. SanchiTachi 02:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but it clearly violates Wikipedia:Notability (people) under "The person has been the subject of published1 secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.2" idendependent criteria. Editorials are not notable sources of information nor are non-independent works when her notability has not been established by enough verifiable sources to even have her mentioned. How can you not understand that "writing" an "editorial" is not notable? SanchiTachi 03:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Don't claim I can't read when the first thing you quote is "it is relevant to the subject's notability;" and one editorial does not make the subject notable. Also, it violates "it does not involve claims about third parties, or about events not directly related to the subject;" The subject lacks all notability. None of the sources about her fall under notability, thus, none of the sources can be allowed as she is not notable. Please read "Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability." You are obviously not being objective and it is showing that you are only there to express a serious POV and Soapbox, please cease and desist. SanchiTachi 03:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Furthermore, your quotation of the self published source is only used when the actual person puts forth the information on themselves, not secondary sources. Please don't claim others can't read when you can't understand what: "Self-published material may never be used in BLPs unless written by the subject him or herself." means. Thanks. SanchiTachi 03:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
"The person being written about has to be notable, the sources do not have to pass the same guideline. They just have to be reliable. Citing the ___location of an editorial is a reliable source, as much as any guide you cite in your Warhammer articles."
No. The Warhammer game is produced in 6 major countries, has existed for 25 years, has millions of players, sold billions of dollars worth of goods, has two magazines, over 60 books, etc etc. The people you cite have nothing even close to that. It is obvious that you have no defense but trying to spam absurdities over and over instead of trying to be reasonable and fixing clearly poorly sourced pages. SanchiTachi 03:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- "Your response shows me that you don't understand how this works," Actually, your response shows that you are ignoring facts and instead putting forth things that are blatantly untrue in an uncivil manner. You are expressing a POV and you are being a hypocrit in deleting things. Please read what Wikipedia is. However, you do not seem capable of understanding the fact that the pages I edit are not about the company, but subjects that are written about by multiple published books. The articles are not on the books, and thus, the books are secondary sources. That is all that needs to be said, because that is how notability works. You can feel free to say whatever you want, but you will not be changing how notability is. One editorial and three links that are not independent of you do not have the ability to establish you as notable for a page. Bye. SanchiTachi 03:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2006/2006oncj54/2006oncj54.html Demonstrates that the article by the Toronto Sun is indeed fact, not fiction. By your own words and claims about one source verifying the Toronto Sun source that it could then be put back in. You should do the right thing and change back what you edited out. Thanks. SanchiTachi 06:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
1) You've never read the Toronto Sun article so you can't say if it's fact or fiction. 2) The link above doesn't identify Shane Ruttle Martinez so it doesn't establish anything at all in regards to that article. Frank Pais12:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.jpg
Are my colors really this screwed up, or was the PNG's hue altered?
- Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.PNG - orange
- Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.jpg - red (mine)
I just retook the screenshot. –Gunslinger47 03:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
three unnamed
Reply
Who are you refering to when you mention "we", and why do you think you're in charge here? I'm only stating facts. He trained Ichigo with initial release, but then said he could not train Chad with his final release. You're inserting your own POV into that, and I consider you and your friend ganging up on this as little more than bullying on your part.
If there's a middle ground where we can include all facts here, i'm fine with that, but otherwise I will not back down to intimidation. Thereisnowhy 02:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have, and "several" seems irrelevant since there's only two of you, for all I know, could be the same person. Thereisnowhy 02:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:HARASS
WP:HARASS. This is your warning. You are violating that, and your move is vandalism. Any further move and I will report you for Vandalism. This is your warning.
Furthermore, the books are titled Warhammer 40,000, as they are produced as companions to the Warhammer 40,000 rulebooks as expansion stories about characters in the Warhammer 40,000 board game. You did not respect the naming conventions of our Wikiproject, nor did you seek consensus before your move. Graphic Novels is the proper noun used by Warhammer 40,000 to describe those books. This is not an argument about it, this is a warning for you to not vandalize the page and to leave me alone. SanchiTachi 15:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Its not Ownership, because you did not find a consensus nor did you consult the naming conventions of the Warhammer Wiki Project. SanchiTachi 16:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- In case you hadn't noticed, this user has brought this dispute to AN/I. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Your current move of pictures is unwarranted and goes against the image policy for the group. Images for Armies are only allowed to be displayed if that character is an official member of that army. Stern is not an official member of the Sisters of Battle army, she is an optional character with introduced rules via White Dwarf and does not follow the Codex canon. Furthermore, the Leo article is not about the miniatures, so you cannot place the picture of the miniature there. You can, however, place a picture of the character from the art. Please don't go against the consensus policy for images like you are doing and kindly stop interfering. SanchiTachi 22:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
If you believe that, take it up with Image deletion. Otherwise, you will be reported for 3RR violation. SanchiTachi 22:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Just because the page says that does not mean its community consensus. And yes, it does look like a recent change. Proper footnotes always come within the punctuation. I have my masters in Literature and working towards a doctorate in it, and I've done research my whole life. Don't try to pull these games on me. And yes, you are revert warring and that is obvious as to your original intention. SanchiTachi 23:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
No content in Category:Code Lyoko episodes
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Code Lyoko episodes, by TTN, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Code Lyoko episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Code Lyoko episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Code Lyoko episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
That's because TTN deleted them all. :'( Angie Y. 22:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Sigs
STOP EDITING MY SIGS PLEASE. You are escalating matters. -- Cat chi? 21:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
SanchiTachi
If you must edit the same pages as SanchiTachi then I would recommend using the talk page more to try and seek clarification and try and gain consensus. Even if you don't think he will listen to you at least it allows you to maintain the moral high ground. Otherwise it just drags you both into the mud and makes it even more difficult for others to try and hack out solutions. I've started some sections to deal with the current contentious issues on Talk:Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) and hope that helps somewhat. (Emperor 22:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC))
- Sorry I should have had another word with you when I saw the reverting was getting out of hand and reminded you to stick to the user page and/or report him but it has all played itself out anyway. So just to let you know I have asked for List of Warhammer 40,000 graphic novels to be unblocked (it has now been locked longer than it was live) and we can then move it to the new name. Hopefully, the existence of Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) should help it as it'll help define what shouldn't be on the original entry as it is already covered elsewhere (the miniatures mainly). I have to say while it might be best if you tried to avoid Sanchi in the future (I know I'm panning on doing that) if you (and other editors) hadn't have got involved to try and sort the mess out I'd have given it all up as a bad lot and gone and done something else instead. Fingers crossed, we can now use the current entries as springboards to some good solid entries. The real pity is Sanchi provided a lot of good material they just wouldn't let anyone else edit it. (Emperor 02:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC))
- Well it is impossible to second guess these things Swatjester might be able to work some magic but he is now butting heads with nearly every admin who has tried to help and that just esclaates the whole mess. This is all partly my fault too for asking a rather innocent question - I'd ask it again if I had my time over too (this time round I might be sensible and hide out for a few days until it all blows over though. It is largely out of hands to try and fix but there are plenty of people on the case so someone should be able to do something. Plenty of work for us to do in the meantime. Once the entry is unlocked anyway. (Emperor 03:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC))
Mind telling me where I recruit them? - I'm not Snachi's greatest fan, but can you please your arguements with him off my Talk Page? I have enough issues with my own arguements with him on mine! Cheers. Darkson - BANG! 14:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Please check the WP:AN/3RR section regarding you. Thanks. --Deskana (talk) 00:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben10 ep03 image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben10 ep03 image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben10 ep04 image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben10 ep04 image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben 10 episode 12.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben 10 episode 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Animo image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Animo image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Auntvera image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Auntvera image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hoverboard image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Hoverboard image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jonah image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Jonah image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kraab image.jpg)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Kraab image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Warhammer 40K graphic novel images
Thanks for getting all of those! Well done! --GentlemanGhost 12:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I had a bit of a dispute with the user yesterday. Can you tell Tjstrf that fictional-related categories are allowed on redirects targeted to a section/list of the same name? Chaozu redirecting to List of Earthlings in Dragon Ball#Chaozu is an example. The way this is going, I'll never be able to categorize any of the BLEACH-related redirects as planned; the user continues to disagree on these points and has revealed that all my edits there will be reverted. Lord Sesshomaru
- I thought you did support me; you only said you weren't gonna assist. Sorry for not announcing that I changed my username and complicating things. Can you undo those "rv" edits now, since the link you showed is not against the use of categorizing redirects by super cats.? Lord Sesshomaru
- Way I see it, there will be a new guideline made. Understandable: tell me, did you changed your mind after our little discussion conserning this? Lord Sesshomaru
- What? I don't get what you meant. Lord Sesshomaru
- Ah, so that's why you "supported" me at first? Am I understanding this correctly? Lord Sesshomaru
- {sighs}, looks like I'll have to remove superhuman-type categories from any redirects I see along the editiing. You'd do the same, I figure? Lord Sesshomaru
- As much as I love the Vizard more than the shinigami, I still feel that article should be categorized by superhuman powers. Would it be a waste to create a Vizard in Bleach article just so it can be done or will just Vizard be included in the cats.? Lord Sesshomaru
- What would you suggest? Lord Sesshomaru
- As much as I love the Vizard more than the shinigami, I still feel that article should be categorized by superhuman powers. Would it be a waste to create a Vizard in Bleach article just so it can be done or will just Vizard be included in the cats.? Lord Sesshomaru
- {sighs}, looks like I'll have to remove superhuman-type categories from any redirects I see along the editiing. You'd do the same, I figure? Lord Sesshomaru
- Ah, so that's why you "supported" me at first? Am I understanding this correctly? Lord Sesshomaru
- What? I don't get what you meant. Lord Sesshomaru
- Way I see it, there will be a new guideline made. Understandable: tell me, did you changed your mind after our little discussion conserning this? Lord Sesshomaru
Non-free use disputed for Image:Kazekage.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Kazekage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
I think...
I was thinking about changing the section title "References" to "Notes and references". {{Reflist}} and {{Reflist|1}} to {{Reflist|2}} for nicer looking refs and the titles of template "bleach character info" all to standard "Bleach character info". I noticed that the Naruto-related articles and Dragon Ball-related articles had those "Notes and references" names instead of just "References". Notes and references are pretty much the same things and look more... informal. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
- As pointless as it may be, I'm 100% okay with changing all the "bleach character info" to "Bleach character info" manually. You could call me crazy, but I just feel a lot better doing it. Can I trust that you won't "rv" me? Lord Sesshomaru
- Perhaps it is best to tell you that the top where it says "...is a character in..." should it not be fictional character instead like the other articles? Lord Sesshomaru
- Sorry for replying late. Damn Internet connection failure. I will continue as I was doing. Lord Sesshomaru
- Perhaps it is best to tell you that the top where it says "...is a character in..." should it not be fictional character instead like the other articles? Lord Sesshomaru
Non-free use disputed for Image:Scientologycross.jpg
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Scientologycross.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Munich 1 Poster.jpg
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Munich 1 Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
What the big idea
Black Rhino ranger: Please STOP REDIRECTING Alien forms to Omnitrix, I WANT THE ARTICLE TO BE SHORT. You are going to be blocked for removing and redirecting
Sock puppets?
Upon noting the comments of User:Black Rhino Ranger, User:Snakezilla, and User:Komodo lover, all of whom respond in talk pages in the exact same style, edit the same articles, add (or remove) the same material, have similar usernames relating to animals, and engage in the same types of vandalism. Furthermore, Black Rhino Ranger (whether inadvertenly or through mere stupidity) has pointed to these users here. I would report this, but I would like your opinion on the matter first. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
...
Heh, good job keeping those Bleach articles up to date. Speaking of which, been wanting to ask about this edit. Why overlink exactly? Lord Sesshomaru
- I wish you mentioned that in your summary. It's fine then. Lord Sesshomaru
Re: Linking
Perhaps you responded on the wrong talk page? I honestly have little idea what you're talking about, especially since I haven't beene editing very much the last few days. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 22:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
It was resulted in a merge, so not make that page again. DietLimeCola 18:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)