Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Cleanup

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mike Rosoft (talk | contribs) at 17:45, 17 May 2005 (Also listed Spun and Furniture Today). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Shortcut

Newest | March 2005 | Feb 2005 | Jan 2005 | Dec 2004 | Nov 2004 | Oct 2004 | Sep 2004 | Leftovers | Instructions

Please read Wikipedia:Cleanup process for instructions on maintaining this page.

If you are here because you have found a page that needs attention, please:

  1. Check the resources for collaboration box on the right to make sure there is not a more appropriate page.
  2. Consider adding a tag to the article instead of listing it here. See Wikipedia:Cleanup resources. This may reduce work in the long term.
  3. If you want to do a traditional listing instead of tagging, please do so under the appropriate date heading below.

Some editors prefer that helpers work on leftovers and older articles first, just to deal with them and get them out of the way. But either preference, new or old, all help is appreciated. If you have a cleanup routine, add your name and your routine preferences (how often, old/new articles, what subjects, etc ) to the cleanup routine list. Also remember that you can submit an article in need of cleanup to the Cleanup Taskforce (which is also always looking for members).

Image copyright Westfaelische Saxophoniker, may be used freely with attribution.
Image copyright Westfaelische Saxophoniker, may be used freely with attribution.
Resources for maintenance
and collaboration
Cleanup
Categories
Create an article
Referencing
Stubs
Deletion
Polishing
Translation into English
Images
Controversy
To-do lists
Disambiguation
More
For a listing of ongoing discussions,
see the dashboard.

May

May 17, 2005

May 16, 2005

The lists of encyclopedia topics could do with renumbering.

Why had all the entries from 8 May to present "vanished"?


May 15, 2005

  • Lara Roxx - needs references which document that she got HIV from Darren James, or leaves us open to a lawsuit. RickK 21:18, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Words hardest to translate - I fixed the grammar up a little bit and tried to organize the page, but it seems to be about two different things. First, it talks about a list of words named "Words hardest to translate," by a British company. Then later, it leaves that topic to talk about specific difficulties in translation and also a small note about certain that are easy to translate. Maybe it should be divided into two articles, one about the list and another about problems in translation. FuzzyOnion 22:49, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Infantilism - Horrible article with way too many sections, some of which are useless, and section 'A list of known abusers on the net' is definitely not encyclopedia material. Wikipedia is not a campaign ground regardless of issue. - Mithent 15:34, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • So the list is a bit out of line, but the complexity of ABDL and Infantilism is extensive. We have cleaned it up before and deleted certain sections. But if you have not read the whole article, you can not say it is a horrible article. And which sections would be useless may I ask? Read the whole article and then we can debate what needs to be cleaned up, but I doubt you know very much about ABDL yourself. --OrbitOne 16:02, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
We have removed the suggested section regarding known abusers as per your suggestion, as well as many of the sections that we believed might not be necessary. Your input is appreciated. If there are any other specific suggestions you might have, they would be appreciated. Meanwhile we have removed the Cleanup notice. Thanks for your interest and advice on this article.
Scott P. 16:22, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
Well, generally I was referring to the organisation in the article - it's informative, certainly, but it has a huge number of sections, some of which are extremely short. Most are only one paragraph long, and I feel that merging such things as 'Loss of Power' elsewhere would be a good idea. There's some description of splitting the article on the Talk page, and I think that might also be a good idea. I don't really know about ABDL, no. I'll be quiet about this now and leave it to your own editing. -- Mithent 16:29, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Thankyou for your understanding. We will try to clean up sections, but I have plans about expanding loss of power. I might make it into an article of its own in relation to sexual slavery fantasy. --OrbitOne 16:38, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

May 11, 2005

  • Dancing Eagle - looks like a candidate for deletion even.. meh. Yorick, Jester of Elsinore 11:53, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
  • History of the Balkans - was COTW, enormous amounts of text were added but some sections are still blank, and what is already there could probably use colloborative editing. --Tothebarricades.tk 19:37, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Shrivel - combination stub/disambiguation/extended dictdef. page that also needs wikification. --Dcfleck 00:24, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
Parts of this were so badly written they may have been a joke (DiHyrdogen oxide...instead of saying water?). I threw away a lot of junk. Now it may need some expansion. RJFJR 01:43, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

May 10, 2005

  • Soulcake - chunk of text written in the first person followed by another (unwikified) chunk of text cut and pasted from [1]. (It's credited, but may still be a copyright issue.)
  • Ibrahim 'Ali Salman
    I'd like other editor's opinions beofre listing this on VFD. Doesn't get any google hits. I tagged it as a candidate for tanswiki to Wikisource as soon as it appeared, but I'm still unsure of its place in wikipedia at all. The JPS 10:53, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Social Sciences and Philosophy Requested Articles list [2] has been duplicated several times in the last few days, so that it is now several times longer than it should be. This may have been my fault. I was trying to remake the History, Politics and People sections in to some semblance of logical order, and was having (slow) connections problems at the same time. Sorry seems an insufficient comment. Also cannot revert the page to an earlier state because of the connection/site problem.

User:Philip Cross 08:34 (and 19:34) May 10, 2005 (UTC)not enough information on the topic and not very specific either.

May 9, 2005

I've merged this with Sequence point, clarified and prettied it up a bit, but may need further work. Stoive 23:03, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • RPGFan. Needs a lot of expansion. RPGFan has a rather lengthy and interesting history as far as RPG websites go. I'd do it myself, but I don't think I could provide a NPOV. --Kweee 16:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion is to try your best with it. NPOV can be worked on by anyone, but substantially fewer can add any information. --Tothebarricades.tk 01:12, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

May 8, 2005

  • Barbamon - it's a Digimon. I bet a VfD on it wouldn't succeed, because we have so much of this junk, but something needs to be done with this badly-written stub. RSpeer 06:51, May 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Hualapai -- needs to be in complete sentences and conform to Wikipedia standards. Exabyte (talk)­ 21:44, May 8, 2005 (UTC)

May 7, 2005


May 6, 2005

  -Rewrote it. May have been too link-happy.

May 5, 2005

May 3, 2005

May 2, 2005

May 1, 2005

Took a shot at it; reluctant to go further w/out any references bsides my own (questionable) memory. . . . Soundguy99 05:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • White bread - needs some US-centric statements altering or removing

April

April 30, 2005

  • White trash - I don't know how to explain it, it just really need improvement. See for yourself. MessedRocker 04:13, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
    • I cleaned it up a bit. If you feel like anything else needs to be done, go ahead. --Woohookitty 21:01, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Wow, the article has really improved! I think it's time that the clean-up box be removed, but I don't want to do so unless others say it's ok. MessedRocker 21:28, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
    • I have done some final copyediting and Wikifying, and have removed the cleanup tag. The article is still on the short side, but someone more interested in the topic than I am will have to take over its expansion.Dave1898 10:39, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cadbury-Schweppes - Parts are very informal and not appropriate for Wikipedia, such as a line stating "marketed under another name in Canada, but unable to determine which name (help?)". - User:Gerbon689 21:27 (UTC)
    • I edited it a bit and removed some superfulous content. Looks ok now. --Woohookitty 22:33, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Pax Britannica to Pax Americana Definitely needs to be looked at. Not sure if it's a VfD candidate, but it's certainly POV, possibly original research/copyvio, and definitely needs to be moved to a more general article about Britain, the US, or the world in general. saturnight 23:47, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)

April 29, 2005

  • Box_office_bomb - This list needs to be all table format or all list format -- Cmulgrew
    • Unless you are looking at a different list than I am, it looks like all table format to me. --Woohookitty 20:19, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • In Fact I edited the page and put all data into tables last friday --Deathmaster9 01 May 2005
  • Zion I - barely a stub worth of info about the rap group, and the album information should probably be put in separate pages or formatted differently. --Howrealisreal 02:56, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I started the cleanup of it. It's a bit better now MessedRocker 04:25, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • eGovernment - totally unreadable
    • I added a bunch of tags, including cleanup and cleanup-verify. This might be a candidate for complete rewrite too if someone wants to add that tag. It's a mess. --Woohookitty 20:37, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • List_of_Mexico_City_metro_stations - Could somebody experienced please re-arrange the layout of the images? I tried but drove me nuts... Rune Welsh
    • I added attention and cleanup tags. I will TRY to sort out the pictures, but I'm afraid only a nuclear bomb will do. ;-) --Woohookitty 22:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Yu Yu Hakusho Episode summaries - I processed this in VfD/old. No consensus to delete, but definitely needs help. Mackensen (talk) 04:41, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Boy (book) - Uses "you", "I think", and too much subjective interpretation. Nightwatch
    • I've really cleaned it up, but I'm still leaving the cleanup tag in just in case it could have more improvement. MessedRocker 14:41, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
    • I'll remove the tag. I added the ISBN info and shortened it a bit. --Woohookitty 22:38, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 26, 2005

  • Water fluoridation - this is an important topic, but the article needs a lot of work. --Brendanfox 13:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Clarabell Lansing - Is there anything notable about this person besides the manner of her death?
    • No, but the matter of her death is still pretty notable. They named a garden after her, so that's of worth. -- user:zanimum

April 25, 2005

April 24, 2005

  • Morehead Scholarship - looks like a brochure, not an article.
    • I've done a fair bit of work, but there's still a lot to be done Bluap 11:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Information broker copyright violation?
  • Crystal children - its currently just a stub, i need help fleshing this article out.
    • I did a bit of research, and since "crystal children" is just a title for very young "indigo children", I just did a merge-n-redirect. MessedRocker 15:12, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • Indigo Children - seems a little too pessimistic and focused on the book rather than on what Indigo children are considered to be. - Skepticism aside, some people still dispute if the holocaust or evolution occured, so can we trim down the skepticism article a bit.

April 23, 2005

April 22, 2005

April 21, 2005

  • Communications in Gabon - more or less a list; needs an introduction and context. --tomf688(talk) 00:22, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Pastoral - not very encyclopedic; needs subheadings; hard to follow; poor flow. --tomf688(talk) 00:09, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Infinity - writing is chatty and rambling. It seems, for example, that one long sentence starts out talking about Buzz Lightyear and ends up talking about transfinite cardinals. Most of the article is that unfocused. There has been some dispute over what the page should contain before, so good luck. RSpeer
  • Professional Slow Pitch Softball League - Needs to have corrected tables. Currently it looks jumbled. --Idont Havaname 15:42, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Full moon party - slangy, chatty, non encyclopedic. Grutness|hello?   06:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Derek Trucks - Significant blues musician, but terrible/non-wiki article. Rogerd 17:33, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 20, 2005

  • Nazareth Speedway - Fact information does not seem right. Belmont Stakes
  • Alexander Exquemelin - I just moved it from Exquemelin, as "Alexander" seems to be the first name he is most commonly referred to by. As it is, it is more of an exposition on Exquemelin's book rather than him as a person. DO'Иeil 08:09, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Twix - very sloppy, why does there need to be an ingredient listing? Mcfly85
  • Carpenters: besides needing copy-ed, IMO there is enuf material for three short, coherant articles within this confusingly organized one: one abt the duo, and two bios. Note in any case that the bio secn is no bio but the childhood portion for one, and the organization by decades is offensive to the concept of recognizing the trends in order to tell a person's or group's chronology in terms of its natural units. Are we supposed to believe that this group, e.g., listened to Al Franken, and took it to heart that they would have to become something different from what they had been in the Me Decade, to succeed in the Al Franken Decade? --Jerzy (t)
  • Camillo Agrippa: de-stub, wikify; is this master of the rapier the same person as "*Agrippa, Camillo, 16th century architect, civil engineer" on List of people by name: Ag ?? --Jerzy (t)
  • Sorry, Wrong Ed. The creator keeps removing the cleanup tag, but I just can't make any sense out of the article. I can't even work out what on earth the thing its describing actually is, other than some kind of comedy sketch. I also can't see how its related to Lemony Snicket who is referenced in the article. David Johnson [T|C] 22:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • This is a description of an episode of the Cartoon Network show Ed, Edd n Eddy. Upon further examination, all of the episode articles connected with that show need a sentence added to the top explaining what they are (the author appears to not understand that a reader or editor can find these articles without going "through" the main article). They are also written in horrible fanboy-style. Big cleanup project. Willing to assist, but I could use some help from editors more familiar with the show - I hardly watch any T.V. at all. I don't get the Lemony Snicket link either. Soundguy99 18:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 19, 2005

  • Boob tube - currently a dictionary definition that thinks it's a disambiguation page.
A disambiguation page is supposed to link to other, more specific pages, not just act as a dictionary definition. As such, it is silly to have Tube top just linking to here. Moreover, Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
Three possible solutions:
  1. If someone's in a position to create an adequate Tube top article, by all means do it, and then put back the link to it back on Boob tube.
  2. Delete Tube top - then the link can be put back and Boob tube will be that little bit more like a dab page again
  3. Delete Boob tube - it's already got a Wiktionary entry (though not a very good one) anyway.
-- Smjg 16:19, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I tried my hand at improving this. I moved the redirect of Tube top to Shirt as there seems to be no disagreement about what a tube top is. It still may need, however, to be transfered to Wiktionary. -65.66.103.43 14:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) (I'm sorry that my computer seems to be logging me out).

April 18, 2005

April 16, 2005

April 15, 2005

That was an easy fix! :) Grutness|
Some of us want to put in the information/wikify rather than deal untangling such problems. Quite a few of the French Cantons/Communes etc link up to disambiguation pages: could they be made easier to split up when information is provided? (And the French prefect lists in French could be translated - and set out consistently in both languages - does not need a knowledge of the language.)

hello?   07:24, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Just pointing out a few other things that could be done - the French lists are inconsistently laid out etc.
  • Chacón. A mess. Unwikified, unformatted. May even be two separate articles (it seems to be on two different subjects) - it's difficult to tell. Grutness|hello?   03:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's more than a mess, it's a copyright violation. See [3] Revived 19:37, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 14, 2005

  • Order of the Red Banner Massive rewrite, re-arrange photo graphs and need to find more information about the medals. Zscout370 11:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Night of the Aurochs Current article is a laudatory review. Needs NPOV-ing, more details. Ellsworth 14:04, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • France seems to have been vandalised (by someone with less intelligence than the onions mentioned).
  • Ageusia: dicdef
I've fixed it and made it happy-like. Vengeful Cynic

April 13, 2005

  • Silver ratio - missing (presumably) mathematical expressions: "The sequence [...], of power fractional parts, where [...] is the fractional part, is equidistributed for almost all real numbers x > 1, with the silver ratio being one exception." -- Smjg 17:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Camera diet- poor language, needs to talk about the concept by using the concept itself, not an example. -Frazzydee|✍ 22:25, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
+paragraphized, grammatified.

April 12, 2005

  • Ordination of women - not at all encyclopaedic. Sarge Baldy 15:24, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • tried to clean this up a bit - expanded protestant section, but the Roman Catholic section still seems a bit of an apologetic - perhaps someone with more knowledege could have a go--Doc Glasgow 13:28, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Orphaned Pages needs a brief introduction (on the first page at least).
  • There is a line of text above the intro/date box on this page which has wandered in from elsewhere.

April 11, 2005

There seems to be a problem with entries for (recent dates) - appearing in the editing box but not the saved version.

April 10, 2005

  • Use-define chain - language
  • Word salad - First paragraph and rest of the article have absolutly nothing to do with eachother. --216.159.156.214 07:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I split the article in two. *Kat* 07:37, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Habsburg - seems to be having an identity crisis. Not sure if it is a list, an article or a coalition of formats. *Kat* 06:41, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
    • Suggested splitting into two articles on talk page. Crazynas 05:27, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Leesa and Laura Andrew - I suspect that this whole page is a hoax, but am far from sure. Could someone take a look and see if they think if deserves to be listed on VfD? Lupin 06:10, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Google verifies that they exist, but I'm not sure they are encyclopedic. *Kat* 07:28, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
      • It is borderline, but I would tend to keep it. Zzyzx11 | Talk 23:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • They may exist, but can anyone verify any of the facts in the article? Lupin 23:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Karl Zell - unwikified copy-and-paste from the Catholic Encyclopedia --Tothebarricades.tk 03:30, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Wikified, categorized, modified some of the blatant pov to a more npov, removed a couple of statements to the discussion page. Still needs work by somebody more familiar with the subject.*Kat* 07:23, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Republic (Plato) - Needs improvement. Not presented very coherently. --Tothebarricades.tk 03:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Pancho Villa - "Nevertheless, Carranza delayed to Villa by the proximity of other heads, specially the sonorenses, reason why Villa began to also separate of the Maximum Head of the Revolution. In 1914, Carranza mentioned a convention of the revolutionary forces, to file harshness among them, without obtaining its objective, because Villa seized of the convention, in Aguascalientes, and broke relations with Carranza, nominating a new president of the Republic, Villa took, with the General Emiliano Zapata, the city of Mexico, having Carranza that to flee towards the port of Veracruz. But then the sonorense Alvaro Obregón, constitutionalist commander of the forces of Carranza, calls, began to beat to those of Villa, convencionistas calls, until managing to annihilate them, in the famous battle of Celaya, where Obregón lost an arm. Villa looked for the recognition of the United States, for his government, and as he did not obtain it, he visited the border population of Columbus, where he take weapons" etc etc. Is this just a poor translation or is the result of setting a computerised translator loose (presumably on a Spanish version)? Either way, it seems to need help, and I am afraid my Mexican history really isn't up to much, so I really don't understand enough of the context to fix it. Could anybody assist? There doesn't seem to be any of the original language left so I didn't list it on pages needing translation. VivaEmilyDavies 01:40, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Location of jerusalem temple needs wikification. --Redattack34 19:36, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
    • wikified, stubbed and catagorized, still needs some copyediting changed template from cleaup to copyedit Crazynas 05:44, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • List of World War II aces by country Lots of names in no apparent order The names should be sorted alphabetically by surename (Except for China and Japan). Fornadan 21:14, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 9 2005

  • Edible salt - Needs fact check--Zxcvbnm 18:40, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Torizo - Needs spelling, grammar, and merge from Golden Torizo.--Zxcvbnm 18:40, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I cleaned the article up a lot. Someone might still want to work on it. By the way, Golden Torizo redirects to Torizo. --Redattack34 19:44, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Randall Terry — I added a paragraph on NOW v. Scheidler, a 1994 Supreme Court case in which he was named co-defendant; the case pertained to the application of RICO, under which Terry settled out of court in 1998. However, it still needs work, especially with regards to POV. It is currently in chronological order, but the order is not entirely logical.
  • Presbyterian Youth Connection needs wikification, cleanup, and organization. I'm not sure this article is notable enough for Wikipedia. If anyone wants to they could check that out. --Redattack34 02:19, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
    • I reworked/reformatted into sections, wikified, still needs some factual help tho. Crazynas
  • Samer Issa - Needs wikification and cleanup. Might not be notable enough. --Redattack34 20:02, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
    • I reworked and reformatted this entry. I know absolutely nothing about him, so this is as good as I can do. The original author of this entry created several other pages that badly need cleanup, I'll go do those next. - Rjhatl 23:09, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 8 2005

  • New Historicism has two unintegrated sections, one wikified and the other not, with an external link between them. -Acjelen
    • Sholtar Did the work wikifying and cleaning up this article, I went ahead and removed the notice. Crazynas 10:38, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

April 7 2005

  • Talk:Papal election needs updating for clarity - ie references to "the present pope" etc.
  • Dina Powell - Lacks context, wikification
  • Hasni - an article might be justifiable, but this is PoV, not wikified, poorly structured, the title should be Cheb Hasni - his full name, and what have you.
    • I edited it a bit, it still needs a lot of work though. Like a discography...RadioYeti
      • Further cleanup done, and I've now removed the tag --Martpol
  • In the page on Lead please rewrite this sentence: The origin of the name of the fruit called a plum is not related. (i.e. not related to Latin word plumbum meaning lead).
That was crazy! It was way harder than it looked. I came up with, "The word "plum" (the fruit) is of a different origin altogether and is unrelated."
I found out where plum actually came from. It's an Old English word. Mr. Internet 17:48, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • Fjortis undoubtedly refers to a real phenomenon and is IMHO worth its own entry, but at the moment, it's in dire need of NPOVing. Phrases such as "Sweden's biggest (and most hated) community" don't seem very encyclopedic, either. It'd be great if someone who's familiar with the Swedish version of the underage girls drinking themselves silly should take a look at this. Captain Disdain 01:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Belstone - apparently some town or village in England. Looks like an article/book summary (but Google brought up no copyvio). Needs abridging, wikifying, context. - Marcika
    • I've removed the tag following some fairly extensive cleanup. But I wouldn't like to remove any more material than has gone already. - Martpol
  • St. Cloud State University - seriously POV praise for the university in a non-encyclopedic writing style. - Marcika 02:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Wow. That was awful. I did a quick rewrite of the page to remove the POV stuff and the vandalism that occured afterward. Rjhatl 02:53, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Little green men - I've been going through the synonyms for extraterrestrial life and found this page. It appears to be about the discovery of pulsars, but has the title "Little Green Men". No clear explaination for this title is given. It probably needs to be merged with the pulsars article. -Acjelen
    • Intro/references added and Pulsar information moved into a sub-section. More is probably needed though. — RJH 17:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

April 5 2005

  • David Bawden: I suspect i'd ask for PoV clnup if i could understand what it's saying ('Calling him an "anti-pope" would undoubtedly be inaccurate as to all appearances the following he has, compared to Pope John Paul II, is minuscule, making him comparable to other similar pretenders to the Papal name, like ...').--Jerzy (t)
  • Pooja Batra needs bio & heavy copy edit to Filmography --Jerzy (t)
  • First French Empire is heavily laden with 1911 Britannica POV, and maybe some factual errors as well. There's been some discussion on the talk page. We all seem to agree it's a problem, but no one involved has considered themselves expert enough to really take it on. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:27, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

April 3 2005

April 2 2005

  • Follow Your Footsteps - unencyclopedaic, needs a little work. --Tothebarricades.tk 08:09, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Cleaned up some, this still needs quite a bit of information Crazynas 20:41, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Juan de Zumárraga - An entire Catholic Encyclopedia entry has simply been copied and pasted into the article, without any Wikification at all. DO'Иeil 07:23, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
    • wikified, still needs some work tho Crazynas 21:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Panarchy - Right now, this article is little more than a collection of quotes by various panarchist writers. I don't know enough about the subject to clean it up myself. -- Mihnea Tudoreanu 21:49, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Orders of Council - needs much work. It's a stub dealing with one highly specific historical use of this much more general and widely-used term. Grutness|hello?   12:12, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • pretty well finished - moved to Orders in Council (1807) and re-writen - still needs catagories --Doc Glasgow 00:01, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)


  • Rindwater - April 1?
    • No hits on Google or Clusty. Submitted for VFD as hoax. Mgm|(talk) 21:47, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)

April 1 2005


Newest | March 2005 | Feb 2005 | Jan 2005 | Dec 2004 | Nov 2004 | Oct 2004 | Sep 2004 | Leftovers | Instructions

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup&oldid=13855284"