Fran Rogers
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I prefer to keep all correspondence in the same place; if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. If I post a message on your talk page, please reply there rather than here. Thank you!
PASH newsletter - Issue 001
 The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter
| |
The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced. | |
To-do list
| |
|
- Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.JA10Talk • Contribs 00:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you closed this article as keep following the AFD discussion. All agreed in the discussion that the copyvio sections had to be removed. No one bothered to do it, including the closing admin. For the next time could you remove the copyvio sections or warn an admin who deals with copyvio's about the article. Garion96 (talk) 12:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Active user verification
Hello, Fran Rogers. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:WPNN, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on WP:WPNN. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Diez2 23:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Rogue Cat
Haha good one! Ali (t)(c) 00:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Love the macro templates, man. Made one meself --> User:Riana/Cat. There shall be many more, I hope. Riana (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Closing section discussions
When closing discussions at WP:TFD, WP:UCFD, and places where each discussion doesn't have its own separate subpage, could you please place the top template below the section header rather than above? This makes it so people editing the section directly above don't see all the substituted code in their edit box. See Wikipedia:Deletion process. –Pomte 07:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Speedy closing discussions
YOu closed several discussions at WP:UCFD as "Delete". Your edit summary said that they were speedy deletions per WP:SNOW. The reasoning (in most cases) was fine, but you should note that at the top of each discussion, rather than just the edit summary. So instead of:
- Delete
instead:
- Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW.
Incidentally, closing discussions per WP:SNOW (especially with results of "Delete") has become controversial recently, so you may wish to keep that in mind when deciding whether a discussion should continue the full 5 days, or not.
Also, there were three discussions that clearly didn't qualify for WP:SNOW, since they only had 3 or less contributors:
- Category:Dadaist Wikipedians
- Category:Transformation Fetishist Wikipedians
- Category:BBW Wikipedians
Based on the above, I'll go ahead and help and clarify your closures, and relist those three since they were improperly closed. If you have any thoughts or concerns about this, please let me know. - jc37 00:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
You closed the AfD and deleted Mack G, but not all of the other articles associated with it. Corvus cornix 15:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Cool, thanks. Corvus cornix 18:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
This user recently finished a block and has immediately resumed going against consensus by restoring all of edits that were reverted during the block and continues incivility. You previously declined Eep's unblock request and warned him about further disruption, so I thought I would let you know. Thanks.--Dcooper 16:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Message for user:H
Hi Krimpet, could you please put a message on user talk:H for me? It's a page you protected. "Dear H, I'm so sorry this happened. Thank you for making this place better. Living well is the best revenge. Take care and Happy Solstice. Kla'quot (talk | contribs) 06:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)" Thanks in advance Krimpet! Kla'quot (talk | contribs) 08:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Done. =) Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 11:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)