Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Diyarbakir

< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | Case
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FunPika (talk | contribs) at 23:12, 29 April 2007 (→Diyarbakir: -Archiving). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Diyarbakir

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Diyarbakir}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: B

Although both users are probably too old to check, their checkuser data should have been preserved after the RfArs. Although I feel the user is borderlining disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits with less than 100 "professional" edits, a consensus was not reached to this end: Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard#Diyarbakir and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Diyarbakir.

Additional evidence:

Overall the user made no edits on wikipedia/wikipedia talk name space that isn't 'concerning me' (his edits came after mine) even though he demonstrates he knows how to get around with his 10th edit. User made no edits on category namespace that are not contradicting my edits. He may have completely opposite views, this shouldn't prevent him in making edits that are not contradicting my edits specifically. Individually most/all these edits are sane but collectively I feel they fall under WP:HA which would follow the edit pattern of User:Moby Dick.

I suspect a Moby Dick sockpuppet more but it could also be Xebat or half a dozen other such banned/disruptive users.

-- Cat chi? 12:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Xebat is very stale, and I don't know of any records (or don't have them myself). However,   Confirmed that Diyarbakir = Moby Dick. Dmcdevit·t 21:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Diyarbakir&oldid=126973202"