Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of Structure and Counterstructure
- Theory of Structure and Counterstructure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
If the article is correct, this is a newly developed theory that has not been referenced by any secondary sources (none show up on a google search). It has been substantially edited by two people, one of whom is clearly the author of the theory. A search of "structure and counterstructure" comes up with a few more google hits. Some of which show that this phrase has been used as a background theory by other academics. For example, 1993 "The Legend of The First Pahkola: Structure and Counter-Structure in a Syncretistic Yaqui Myth" by Alfred Robinson, and, 1981, "Enoch, Levi, and Peter: Recipients of Revelation in Upper Galilee", by George W. E. Nickelsburg. These are, however, different uses of the term. I am unsure of the right attitude to take to this article. So this is a somewhat tentative AfD proposal. Is wikipedia a place for "new theories developed by academics and published in a couple of places", but not yet treated seriously by anyone else? Anarchia 21:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)