Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zinjha
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AllyUnion (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 11 February 2005 (Finalizing VFD Results). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 13:08, 11 February 2005 by AllyUnion (talk | contribs) (Finalizing VFD Results)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:08, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is nonsense and gets only 1 hit on Google. Carrp | Talk 20:38, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Author seems not to like the possiblilty of the vote and removed notice. Page is nonsense. Chotchki | Talk 3:55PM, 5 Feb 2005 (EST)
- Delete as original fiction. Wyss 21:03, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It's some kind of fiction but without context (at least I hope it's fiction). trivia (nn) or else it's nonsense. RJFJR 21:13, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unverifiable. — Ливай | ☺ 22:30, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Just nonsense --Lawlore 22:57, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Surely this is speedy deletable as nonsense? --BM 14:40, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion applies to patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is not just stuff that one doesn't understand. (After all, no editor can understand or know everything.) Patent nonsense is stuff that one cannot understand (e.g. random characters, HTML markup with no text, random words). Since this article makes sense, being written in coherent English, it is not patent nonsense. It's just completely false. Deciding that an article is utter fiction is something that we don't leave in the hands of just two people. Delete. Uncle G 01:24, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
- Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:36, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is pseudoscientific nonsense, as he mentions Nibiru (aka planet X). However Zinj should be an entry. Zinjanthropus is derived from it, this is Australopithecus boisei (originally known as Zinjanthropus boisei). Also, Zinj is mentioned in the movie Congo (movie).Phlebas 15:04, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.