Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Mailer diablo

Question

What are your views of the proposed Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct and User Bill of Rights?

--HK 15:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both should be in place ages ago. The former is rather long though, I thought the Recusal section could be easily summarised with use common sense. - Mailer Diablo 16:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Empty Q&A, What's This?

The reason why there was only one question on Q&A, is because I joined the elections around the last few days. I apologise for my lateness in my candidacy. I'm not sure if questions may still be posted, but if it is I welcome any new questions to be posted to clarify your doubts.

After looking at the current votes, I suppose many would like me to elaborate on my statement and direction, so here it is. Personally, I believe that punishment should be handed out on the basis that it would hopefully reform users, and second chance of change. Don't be surprised to see me in favour for shorter bans in place of alternative action (such as mentorship, probation, article bans, etc). If you simply hardban a user outright, he/she's probably only going to jump his/her ban and continually reset the date. A good example would be Mike Garcia, reformed member currently on mentorship.

I believe an arbitrator should have three important aspects that they must uphold, which are part of my principles - Integrity, civility and sense of shame :

Arbitrators are in a way seen by the community as role models and should show examplary conduct and integrity, for that they are assigned to handle the dirtiest of cases. I'm personally surprised by the length of Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Code_of_Conduct, because I had previously believed that the community gives trust to the arbitrators not to go down to almost single scenario.
Civility is paramount. In real life, I used to get mad before, but you'll quickly realise that you won't make many friends for that. The same thing goes in Wikipedia. I believe that I have tried my best in keeping my cool, and have a clean record in civility.
For sense of shame, it is the ability to able to reflect one's actions when questioned or brought to attention, and if one does feel embarassment for his/her actions it should be corrected. It should be understood that as humans, everyone will have their shortcomings, but it depends whether one is willing to change for the better.

- Yours faithfully, Mailer Diablo 02:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]