Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model United Nations Development Programme

Model United Nations Development Programme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tries to assert notability, but there are not enough reliable sources per WP:GNG. Seems almost like a club website. Although in terms of AfD this isn't a valid argument, there are many much larger conferences such as the UCLA and Berkeley Model UN Conferences, as well as Stanford and Harvard that draw over a thousand participants from all over the world, and still don't have enough reliable sources. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 22:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Model United Nations. There is some useful content, but this programme is not notable, and the only two sources are not independent. If it could be sourced better, I'd change my mind. Bearian (talk) 21:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]