Was up for Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (nomination), but the author removed the tag. It's still a podcast whose best claim to notability is a mention on two other podcasts. —Cryptic (talk) 16:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, 52 episodes, has a bit of feedback on Yahoo podcasts. --Interiot 16:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Does not seem notable enough. --Andy Saunders 17:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It is notable enough in certain circles, however the article needs work. Ben W Bell 20:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Just wondering, how come RedBarRadio has been on Wikipedia forever (Alexa 300,000), yet GamersDaily keeps getting deleted (Alexa 170,000)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.35.26.78 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Because even Alexa admits that rankings above 100,000 are meaningless. See Wikipedia:Google test#Alexa test. —Cryptic (talk) 21:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Then how did Red Bar Radio prove their notability in the current 'Non-notable until proven otherwise'-system that exists here?
- I don't see an AFD nomination for them. -- Andy Saunders 23:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thats what I mean. Red Bar just says 'thousands of listeners', without showing proof, and no one bothers them. These GamersDaily guys, on the other hand, have shown concrete proof that they're notable, and have still been targeted TWICE for deletion. I just don't get it.
- I don't see an AFD nomination for them. -- Andy Saunders 23:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable podcast. —Cleared as filed. 22:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)