Contested case hearing

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Laualoha (talk | contribs) at 09:13, 2 October 2011 (start). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

“Contested case hearing” is the name for quasi-judicial administrative hearings governed by state law. State agencies that make decisions that could affect people’s “rights, duties, and privileges” must have a process for holding contested case hearings. The purpose of these hearings is to provide the decision-makers with the most complete and relevant information they need to make a proper decision. These hearings are like an informal court proceeding. They have three parts:

I. Pre-hearing: where the parties and scope of the hearing is decided

II. Hearing: where witnesses are called to testify and evidence is submitted

III. Post-hearing: where the parties propose and advocate for a particular outcome

After these three phases are complete, the decision-makers decide to either approve, deny, or approve with conditions whatever it is that is being proposed. The decision can either be made at the final hearing or a later public meeting.