Irajeevwiki
Joined 12 January 2013
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Anthony.bradbury in topic Talkback
Welcome
|
File permission problem with File:Thiyya mahasabha.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thiyya mahasabha.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thiyyar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thiyyar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Freebirds Howdy! 05:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/THIYYA.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! – GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thiyyar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! gwickwiretalkediting 00:51, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thiyyar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thiyyar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Please don't resubmit the article
resubmitting the article is becoming disruptive, and its not helping. Please find a different way to resolve the issue, re-submitting the article is not helping. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- This really isn't a request. You should go about this another way. If you resubmit I will block your account. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- So I blocked your account (for 48 hours). I'm more than happy to undo the block, on the provision that you will not be re-submitting the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- By the way, you should note there is also a guide to apealing blocks, Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- this is not the end of the world, other users are also watching your actions. You got privilege to block and you are mis using it. Reason to block me is disruptive editing which I didn't do, I was resubmitting my own article. You rejected my article many times today. I was resubmitting my article to see if I can get some one else to check and approve, because you don't know anything about castes in India and you are trying to say your opinion on that. If I'm not well versed in mathematics I wouldn't touch it, it's just like that. You don't know anything about caste or South Indian history and you are trying to say your opinion on that subject. Originally you said grammar mistakes and English quality to reject article then you changed your stand second time and mentioned article already rejected and cannot be published. I was actually waiting for the admin of exhava article to remove POV fork restrictions which you should have checked before rejecting my article. You actions were disruptive not mine and you blocked me. Good on you !!!Irajeevwiki (talk) 11:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Look, there is no way you could misunderstand any intentions here. I told you not to resubmit, but find another way to resolve the issue. I told you I would block you if you'd keep doing it. Instead of discussing it, you continued to resubmit it. I, indeed, know close to nothing about castes in India, but I do know a thing or two about Wikipedia. My reasons for failing the article has nothing to do with my knowledge of castes in India, but was orginially based on use of English, indeed, and this to me is still a reason to fail it. A second overriding reason is the AfD. I re-iterate, AfC is not, and will never be the route to a solution. Because it has gone through AfD, there needs to be a community consensus before anything happens. That means that a single reviewer never should accept the article, it should be dealt with differently. The best way, I think, is an RfC on Talk:Ezhava. Other ways could be going through WP:DRV for the original article. Wikipedia will not go under because of a few extra days of discussion on the Exhava talkpage. You contributions on the AfC could be valuable for a new article. But not before the issues on the grounds of this being a POV fork or not are resolved. You were free to work on this issue, but not on resubmitting the AfC. Since you were unwilling to stop it, I saw no other option than to block you. I will say again, I blocked you *only* for repeatedly submitting the article. If you're ok with resolving the issue in an other way, I will unblock you, as long as you don't re-submit the AfC as long as the issues on the talkpage of Ezhava haven't come to a conclusion that a new article should be created. Can we agree to that? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- So I blocked your account (for 48 hours). I'm more than happy to undo the block, on the provision that you will not be re-submitting the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Snapshotofthethiyyabook.png
Thanks for uploading File:Snapshotofthethiyyabook.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Irajeevwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 123.243.18.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Irajeevwiki". The reason given for Irajeevwiki's block is: "disruptive editing".
- Blocking administrator: Martijn Hoekstra (talk • blocks)
Accept reason: Disabling appeal template; block and autoblock have both expired. Yunshui 雲水 14:57, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Irajeevwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
this account and ip has been blocked by an admin for silly reasons, I'm here on Wikipedia, not for vandalising any article or anything like that. This is an unfair to me, the blocked time was only 48 hrs, it's over 48 hours and still block continues. I was only submitting my article for approval, as a responsible admin Martijn Hoekstra should have adviced me how to get my article published, such as going through Afd and talking in Ezhava talk page for a consensus to remove POV fork, He only gave me proper instructions after blocking, I believe it was an unfair to a newbie. Yes I know there was minor grammatical errors happened in my article, don't know how it happend, may be because I use iPad for editing sometimes and might have happend by auto spell check or might have deleted some section accidentally, but it is not a big reason to reject the article, but every time my appeal gets rejected admins left note to clean up article except one who explained that there was an article published in the past under the same name of my article which I wasn't aware of and he said that article had been through Afd, and an admin created POV fork, that's why he can't put the article to main space and actually we were communicating with the admin who created POV fork but unfortunately admin Martijn Hoekstra reviewed my article and left a silly note to reject iit. I have resubmitted article just to see if any other admins can help me, but every time i resubmit my article Martijn Hoekstra keeps declining anf finally blocked me. if Martijn Hoekstra looked my talk page he wouldnt have declined it, im sure but what he has done here is completely injustice to a new user like me. i requst please unblock my ip and account so that I can edit my article and take necessary steps to get it published. ThanksIrajeevwiki (talk) 15:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this account and ip has been blocked by an admin for silly reasons, I'm here on Wikipedia, not for vandalising any article or anything like that. This is an unfair to me, the blocked time was only 48 hrs, it's over 48 hours and still block continues. I was only submitting my article for approval, as a responsible admin Martijn Hoekstra should have adviced me how to get my article published, such as going through Afd and talking in Ezhava talk page for a consensus to remove POV fork, He only gave me proper instructions after blocking, I believe it was an unfair to a newbie. Yes I know there was minor grammatical errors happened in my article, don't know how it happend, may be because I use iPad for editing sometimes and might have happend by auto spell check or might have deleted some section accidentally, but it is not a big reason to reject the article, but every time my appeal gets rejected admins left note to clean up article except one who explained that there was an article published in the past under the same name of my article which I wasn't aware of and he said that article had been through Afd, and an admin created POV fork, that's why he can't put the article to main space and actually we were communicating with the admin who created POV fork but unfortunately admin Martijn Hoekstra reviewed my article and left a silly note to reject iit. I have resubmitted article just to see if any other admins can help me, but every time i resubmit my article Martijn Hoekstra keeps declining anf finally blocked me. if Martijn Hoekstra looked my talk page he wouldnt have declined it, im sure but what he has done here is completely injustice to a new user like me. i requst please unblock my ip and account so that I can edit my article and take necessary steps to get it published. Thanks[[User:Irajeevwiki|Irajeevwiki]] ([[User talk:Irajeevwiki#top|talk]]) 15:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=this account and ip has been blocked by an admin for silly reasons, I'm here on Wikipedia, not for vandalising any article or anything like that. This is an unfair to me, the blocked time was only 48 hrs, it's over 48 hours and still block continues. I was only submitting my article for approval, as a responsible admin Martijn Hoekstra should have adviced me how to get my article published, such as going through Afd and talking in Ezhava talk page for a consensus to remove POV fork, He only gave me proper instructions after blocking, I believe it was an unfair to a newbie. Yes I know there was minor grammatical errors happened in my article, don't know how it happend, may be because I use iPad for editing sometimes and might have happend by auto spell check or might have deleted some section accidentally, but it is not a big reason to reject the article, but every time my appeal gets rejected admins left note to clean up article except one who explained that there was an article published in the past under the same name of my article which I wasn't aware of and he said that article had been through Afd, and an admin created POV fork, that's why he can't put the article to main space and actually we were communicating with the admin who created POV fork but unfortunately admin Martijn Hoekstra reviewed my article and left a silly note to reject iit. I have resubmitted article just to see if any other admins can help me, but every time i resubmit my article Martijn Hoekstra keeps declining anf finally blocked me. if Martijn Hoekstra looked my talk page he wouldnt have declined it, im sure but what he has done here is completely injustice to a new user like me. i requst please unblock my ip and account so that I can edit my article and take necessary steps to get it published. Thanks[[User:Irajeevwiki|Irajeevwiki]] ([[User talk:Irajeevwiki#top|talk]]) 15:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=this account and ip has been blocked by an admin for silly reasons, I'm here on Wikipedia, not for vandalising any article or anything like that. This is an unfair to me, the blocked time was only 48 hrs, it's over 48 hours and still block continues. I was only submitting my article for approval, as a responsible admin Martijn Hoekstra should have adviced me how to get my article published, such as going through Afd and talking in Ezhava talk page for a consensus to remove POV fork, He only gave me proper instructions after blocking, I believe it was an unfair to a newbie. Yes I know there was minor grammatical errors happened in my article, don't know how it happend, may be because I use iPad for editing sometimes and might have happend by auto spell check or might have deleted some section accidentally, but it is not a big reason to reject the article, but every time my appeal gets rejected admins left note to clean up article except one who explained that there was an article published in the past under the same name of my article which I wasn't aware of and he said that article had been through Afd, and an admin created POV fork, that's why he can't put the article to main space and actually we were communicating with the admin who created POV fork but unfortunately admin Martijn Hoekstra reviewed my article and left a silly note to reject iit. I have resubmitted article just to see if any other admins can help me, but every time i resubmit my article Martijn Hoekstra keeps declining anf finally blocked me. if Martijn Hoekstra looked my talk page he wouldnt have declined it, im sure but what he has done here is completely injustice to a new user like me. i requst please unblock my ip and account so that I can edit my article and take necessary steps to get it published. Thanks[[User:Irajeevwiki|Irajeevwiki]] ([[User talk:Irajeevwiki#top|talk]]) 15:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Your block should by now have gone; please indicate here if it has not. You say that you were just submitting your article for approval, amd this is true. But you continued to submit it on multiple occasions, after it had been rejected, and in spite of being warned that you would be blocked if you continued to do so. I warn you now; if you submit the identical article again I will replace the block. You are welcome to edit here, but write something else. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)