Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interactive application security testing
- Interactive application security testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:OR essay or blog piece. Interesting, informative, but not for Wikipedia. Fiddle Faddle 08:39, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and agree, Wikipedia articles on related subjects could use some work. It was created by a single-purpose account that also tried to create an article on a company mentioned in this one: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quotium Technologies, which would not disqualify it per se. But this one has just too many issues with style being all out of place. Too many capital letters, no lead, raw urls for citations, dated language (" today’s date", "At this point of time", "at present" etc.) reads clearly like a marketing research report (e.g. solutions) not encyclopedia language. W Nowicki (talk) 22:55, 26 September 2013 (UTC)