Uttal, as far as I can tell, is not a staunch defender of ___domain-general processing, or at least not in The New Phrenology. The issue in TNP is whether using neuroimaging techniques to localize cognitive functions is a plausible line of inquiry. Whether you can localize cognitive functions and whether these functions are independent modules are not logical equivalants. This is a serious misrepresentation. A better source of ___domain general processing would be "Rethinking Innateness" by Jeff Elman, et al. MIT Press 1996.