![]() | This is a documentation subpage for Template:Excessive examples. It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. |
Usage
- This template is used to indicate that cleanup is needed for an excessive use of examples.
- This template is a self-reference.
- This template will add articles to Category:Articles with too many examples.
- This template is not useful for Wikipedia:Subst.
- For use in sections, use
|section
{{Cleanup-list}} is for poorly trimmed lists, while {{Example farm}} is for poorly trimmed articles, including prose.
Redirects
- {{Too many examples}}
- {{Examplefarm}}
- {{Bad examples}}
See also
Extended content
|
---|
Other trivia-related templates
|
- General trivia
{{Trivia}}
– Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).{{Trivia section}}
– Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.{{Unfocused}}
– for an article which lacks focus or has no particular topic.- Relevance and importance
{{Off topic}}
– For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article{{Content}}
– For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.{{Importance section}}
– For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.{{Importance inline}}
– For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.{{Better source example}}
– For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.{{Relevance inline}}
– For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.{{Non sequitur}}
– For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.- Excessive detail
{{Overly detailed}}
– For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.{{Summarize section}}
– For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.{{Example farm}}
– For excessive use of examples.{{Too many see alsos}}
– For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.- Topical trivia
{{Self-sourcing examples}}
– For an article or section with poorly cited popular culture examples.{{In popular culture}}
– For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.{{Fiction trivia}}
(or{{In-universe}}
) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).{{Long plot}}
,{{All plot}}
– For excessively detailed plot summaries.{{Cleanup book}}
,{{Cleanup film}}
– For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).{{Game trivia}}
– For too much gaming-related trivia.{{MOSLOW}}
– For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order{{Cleanup university}}
,{{Cleanup school}}
– For excessive detail about an educational institution.{{Famous}}
– For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.{{Localist}}
– For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.- List cleanup
{{Prose}}
– Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.{{Cleanup list}}
– For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.{{List to table}}
– For use where a table would be better than a list.
|}