Talk:Big Brother 2006 nominations table (UK)
Latest comment: 19 years ago by AnemoneProjectors in topic Nominations table series 1
 | Big Brother Redirect‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Colours and formatting
To follow suit with previous nominations tables, the following colour codes should be used:
- Banned: #959FFD
- Ejected: #FFCCCC
- Evicted: #FA8072
- Exempt: #FBF373
- Finalists: #FBF373
- In Big Brotherhood: #DDDDDD
- Next Door: #87CEFA
- No nominations: #CCCCCC
- Not in house: #FFFFFF
- Walked: #FFCCFF
Put all existing housemates at the top
I think we should put all the current HMs at the top of the list as the table will be easier to read. Any objections? 80.41.70.35
Good idea! Dalejenkins 14:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Colour changes
I've reverted the colour changes.. there was no consensus to do so, and the bright green was too bright anyway. Please discuss any further changes to colours. -- 9cds(talk) 15:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
That's the colour used for the secret garden in BB6, and two users agreed that something needed to be green. Where is the consensus for it to be blue? I was "being bold" and changing it. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 16:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- The consensus was forming in discussion which you have archived. — FireFox 16:48, 01 July '06
- Well I said I liked the blue and FireFox said perhaps the next thing could be green, if there is a next thing. I was quite happy with that. But I wasn't being entirely serious anyway. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Jayne's moved next door...
Right, so now Jayne is in the main house. Therefore table is inaccurate. Ideas of how to fix? — FireFox 13:30, 02 July '06
- Remove the 'next door' for her, and add Jayne to who was nominated, with a blue background? -- 9cds(talk) 13:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps "Next Door until Day 46"? And then continue this theme for Aisleyne's other three choices (and Aisleyne herself)? Squidward2602 15:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Since this is a nominations table, I don't think it should say "Next Door" for Aisleyne, but it should list Jayne (along with others she nominates this week). Assuming there are no nominations in the main house, the other housemates should say "No nominations", but all five of the new housemate should continue to say "Next door". A note can explain exactly what happens/has happened during the week, including day numbers. Adw2000 11:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm... good idea. -- 9cds(talk) 11:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Will Aisleyne be nominating this week? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oh I just looked at the actually table... ignore me :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- The housemates in the main house are nominating as usual, but Jayne is exempt from nominating or being nominated. [1] Tra (Talk) 15:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Is it good to have Jayne's name next to Aisleyne's, since she will be nominating more people? Alex 18:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Why not? -- 9cds(talk) 20:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry what I meant was is it good to have Aisleyne's nominations, even though they are "internal" evictions and not for public? Alex 18:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Why not? -- 9cds(talk) 20:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Is it good to have Jayne's name next to Aisleyne's, since she will be nominating more people? Alex 18:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm... good idea. -- 9cds(talk) 11:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ash didn't nominate Jayne, she moved her... Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 18:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- No, she named (i.e. nominated) her to be evicted from the House Next Door. It was Big Brother who decided that those evicted from the House Next Door would then enter the main house... Adw2000 12:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Eviction days
Should we incude the day of eviction (etc) in the table? (As it currently is) -- 9cds(talk) 17:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so- all that info can be provided in the main article can't it? Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 17:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Spoilers
I've added the spoiler warning template to the page. I hope that's ok :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Is it necessary? I mean, they announce the nominees on BBLB, which is only an hour and a half before the channel 4 show, and isn't that the only thing on the table that people would want to wait for? Alex9891 11:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I put it up after Michael and thingy moved next door, and this week's nominations were listed here a few hours before they were shown on Channel 4. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- See, now there's big big big spoilers! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I put it up after Michael and thingy moved next door, and this week's nominations were listed here a few hours before they were shown on Channel 4. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Aisleyne's nominations
Should we remove the names of the three housemates she moved and just have Jonathan as he was nominated for actual eviction, whereas all the others are now in the main house? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:18, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I say leave it as it is, because she did nominate them for eviction. The star at the end of that nominations cell should clear up any confusion. Ixistant 22:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- No, get rid of the old names, because overall they don't matter! Alex 22:21, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- And I don't think the star explains Jonathan well Alex 22:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- And Jonathan should be added to the "evicted" bit, yes? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- The note is much better. I think Jonathan should be added to the bottom - can the cell be split or something? Alex 22:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ooh I made something better! I'm excited now! :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- So will Friday's evictee (hopefully Lea) go under Jonathan? Would the days of eviction be needed? Alex9891 23:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, put Lea's (or, I suppose, maybe Richard's) name under Jonathan... but I don't know about the days. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- So will Friday's evictee (hopefully Lea) go under Jonathan? Would the days of eviction be needed? Alex9891 23:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ooh I made something better! I'm excited now! :) -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- The note is much better. I think Jonathan should be added to the bottom - can the cell be split or something? Alex 22:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- And Jonathan should be added to the "evicted" bit, yes? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- And I don't think the star explains Jonathan well Alex 22:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Note 8
Shouldn't it say "Big Brother punished all the housemates apart from Jayne even though she was the one discussing the outside world, by cancelling nominations and putting all housemates up for eviction except her."?? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it would be clearer --Alex9891 (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, they're hardly punishing her, are they? Especially as she should be the next person evicted! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- They are in a way - by being prevented to nominate by her, the few housemates that do like her may not anymore because of it --Alex9891 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- But they're punishing us by not letting us Get Jayne Out! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I know, life's not fair is it? =) --Alex9891 (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- But they're punishing us by not letting us Get Jayne Out! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- They are in a way - by being prevented to nominate by her, the few housemates that do like her may not anymore because of it --Alex9891 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, they're hardly punishing her, are they? Especially as she should be the next person evicted! -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Week 8 nominations
Should the name of each housemate be written, or just All but Jayne? --Alex9891 (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think names should be used, as "All but Jayne" does not properly inform people of who is up for eviction. --JD[don't talk|email] 19:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- All but Jayne, but name them in the note for clarification. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- All but Jayne. It's perfectly easy to understand. The note explains it for the few who for some reason don't understand. With all names listed, it makes the column too wide. — FireFox 19:50, 10 July '06
- Or the row too wide. It's not about a misunderstanding, it's just trying to make the table as clear as possible, without everything having to be written in a note. For instance, what if all housemates were up except one but just through normal nominations? --Alex9891 (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Then, it would say, "all but whoever". Except where it now says "no nominations", it would give the individual nominations per housemate. — FireFox 19:54, 10 July '06
- OK, that seems fine-ish - until you get all except two people, etc. I could go on but I won't - it should be fine. =) --Alex9891 (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Then, it would say, "all but whoever". Except where it now says "no nominations", it would give the individual nominations per housemate. — FireFox 19:54, 10 July '06
- Or the row too wide. It's not about a misunderstanding, it's just trying to make the table as clear as possible, without everything having to be written in a note. For instance, what if all housemates were up except one but just through normal nominations? --Alex9891 (talk) 19:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- All but Jayne. It's perfectly easy to understand. The note explains it for the few who for some reason don't understand. With all names listed, it makes the column too wide. — FireFox 19:50, 10 July '06
- All but Jayne, but name them in the note for clarification. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
All but Jayne will do fine, without making the table look cluttered and messy... ellisjm 20:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, all but Jayne for the above reasons. -- 9cds(talk) 20:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
New Name Move
Why the move to put the (UK series 7) at the end. It was much better in the middle... ellisjm 13:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- How come? The convention and precedent is to have any disambiguation at the end. The stuff in brackets is just there to make it different from anything else that could be "Big Brother nominations table". If there was only on Big Brother series ever, that's where it's be: "Big Brother nominations table. —Celestianpower háblame 21:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Don't forget to move all the other nominations tables. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Week 9 Nominations
Will Week 9 be the first week without a twist in the nomination/eviction process? --Alex9891 (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- At last, it is --Alex9891 (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Amazing -- I thought a normal nomination/eviction process was never going to happen. Adw2000 09:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
House next door colours
IMO the blue colour for House Next Door is horrible. The green colour used for BB4 and BB6 looks much better. What do people think? ellisjm 21:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- BB6's secret garden colour, or a colour, should be used on all of the nominations tables for consistency, I reckon. --JD[don't talk|email] 21:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- I put green on the BB4 table because the BB7 table was changed to green. It was then changed back to blue. I then thought we could use a different colour on BB4 as well, and also BB5 for the Bedsit....... but I wanted to ask first. I like the blue. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well they all need to be the same colour: (BB4:Cam's noms;BB5:bedsit;BB6:secret garden;BB7:house next door). BB6 needs to be green because it was a green secret garden. Therefore, it makes sense to do it (and therefore the others) in green. The other situations have no other reason to be a specific colour... ellisjm 22:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be any colour. It doesn't even have to be the same. Any colour would be perfectly adequate here, equally so even. The colour of the room and the colour of the box on Wikipedia are totally unrelated. I have protected until it can be discussed (not voted upon) here first. —Celestianpower háblame 22:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- OK, maybe needed was the wrong word to use, but IMO, green makes sense because it was a secret garden, and any other colour would be perfect for everything else, but IMO all should be the same colour and so green fits the bill. ellisjm 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be any colour. It doesn't even have to be the same. Any colour would be perfectly adequate here, equally so even. The colour of the room and the colour of the box on Wikipedia are totally unrelated. I have protected until it can be discussed (not voted upon) here first. —Celestianpower háblame 22:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well they all need to be the same colour: (BB4:Cam's noms;BB5:bedsit;BB6:secret garden;BB7:house next door). BB6 needs to be green because it was a green secret garden. Therefore, it makes sense to do it (and therefore the others) in green. The other situations have no other reason to be a specific colour... ellisjm 22:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Green is far too bright. Yes, the blue is similar to the "banned" boxes, but that's not a bad thing – we do not want this table turning into a rainbow. — FireFox 10:10, 19 July '06
- Personally, I agree with FireFox. Pages like these can easily be overpowering with many different colours, shades etc. This actually detracts from the readability of the page, which, after all, is its main purpose. —Celestianpower háblame 10:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- This wouldn't be turned into a rainbow; it would just be an attempt to keep the colours used on the nominations table consistent. Isn't that what people have wanted from the start? --JD[don't talk|email] 21:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Personally, I agree with FireFox. Pages like these can easily be overpowering with many different colours, shades etc. This actually detracts from the readability of the page, which, after all, is its main purpose. —Celestianpower háblame 10:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I put green on the BB4 table because the BB7 table was changed to green. It was then changed back to blue. I then thought we could use a different colour on BB4 as well, and also BB5 for the Bedsit....... but I wanted to ask first. I like the blue. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
If this thing's gonna stay blocked, could one of you admins please add Jayne's name to the evicted box??? godgoddingham333 20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Done. David | Talk 20:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks... godgoddingham333 20:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Note 9
I think Note 9 should say:
- {{fnb|9}} As part of this week's task, housemates will nominate in pairs. The five pairs are Aisleyne and Jennie, Glyn and Mikey, Imogen and Susie, Michael and Spiral, and Pete and Richard. The housemate with the most votes on Friday will be evicted along with their 'best friend'.
because they havn't nominated yet. It can be changed back to past tense once they have nominated. Tra (Talk) 17:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Edit Protection
- the existing text is total nonsense - it has not happened yet. Also, how was that edit applied during the edit protecton? Why are people sooooooooooo desperate to record what they expect or want to believe instead of waiting for proof though the passage of time? Utterly childish(IMO) leaky_caldron 19:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- An admin obviously edited it. I agree. It should be in the future tense. Just at this point, how long's this page gonna remain protected??? godgoddingham333 19:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Not for too much longer. — FireFox 20:02, 23 July '06
- Yes, but when?? Oh yeh, and if no-one's noticed, Jayne is still un-evicted (She needs the rest of her row coloured...) godgoddingham333 01:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Could someone please explain why page is protected? I was gone for a few days and its been protected. WHY?--Jboyle4eva 00:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- it seems that administrators only are now permitted to edit this article, there has been no explanation recorded here, and we mere mortals must apparently await their discretion. If you are concerned about this and believe that a policy has been breached, feel free to consider joining me in an Wikipedia:Requests for comment leaky_caldron 19:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Not for too much longer. — FireFox 20:02, 23 July '06
- After consultation with Celestianpower, I've unprotected the article, and any futher edit wars will be followed by an immediate re-protection. Cheers, — FireFox 20:17, 24 July '06
- An admin obviously edited it. I agree. It should be in the future tense. Just at this point, how long's this page gonna remain protected??? godgoddingham333 19:58, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Notes boxes see
Surely the word "see" repeated across the row is not required? The simple reference to "note 1", "note 2" etc., would be tidier. Don't wish to start an edit war so can some views be left here please? leaky_caldron 20:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's been like that in all previous series. To me, it makes it more clear, rather than just saying "note 1", and it's not doing any harm there. — FireFox 20:33, 24 July '06
- Making an edit is not starting an edit war, having your edit reverted, then reverting it back is starting an edit war. --LorianTC 22:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Jonathan
Is there a way in which we can put a line under Jonathan, to seperate him and Lea?? godgoddingham333 21:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- They are separate... -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- No, I mean a line between Jonathan and Lea so that someone who didn't know much about BB knew that it was only Lea who was evicted with 53 or whatever % and not Jonathan and Lea together... godgoddingham333 22:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you put this:
- No, I mean a line between Jonathan and Lea so that someone who didn't know much about BB knew that it was only Lea who was evicted with 53 or whatever % and not Jonathan and Lea together... godgoddingham333 22:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- (previous cells)
|| '''Jonathan''' ----'''Lea'''<br />53.8%|(next cells)
- (previous cells)
- You get this:
Jonathan
Lea
53.8%
- Tra (Talk) 23:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Could you do it please? It seems to mess up when I try it... Thanks... godgoddingham333 23:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Tra (Talk) 23:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Re-arrangement
Leave all nomination tables of Big Brother and Celebrity Big Brother, in alphabetical order! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonPeter (talk • contribs)
Is there any chance of having the table rearranged in order of eviction? It really is terribly hard to look at as it is now. —JD[don't talk|email] 15:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
I didn't mean to say anything was wrong with it; just that it's really really hard, for me at least, to read it the way it is now. —JD[don't talk|email] 15:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- JD has a point, now that it's nearing the end it's just looking pretty messy. --LorianTC 16:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've had a look at how it's done for other countries. Out of all of the (English language) articles with full nominations tables, the UK and Australia have the housemates listed alphabetically, whilst USA has them listed in order of eviction. Whatever decision is made for this, perhaps it would be good to have all the nominations tables having the same ordering system? Tra (Talk) 19:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- This is how it might look if it was changed. I didn't change it in the article because it's quite a drastic change that would probably require consensus first. Tra (Talk) 15:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like it. —JD[don't talk|email] 15:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I did the BB06 Australia one earlie... it would be yesterday now... I did the BB06 Australia table yesterday, so now it's just up to the Big Brother UK ones to follow. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Go on, change it! --Alex9891 (user) 23:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- in a whiny voice: But that involves wooooorrrrrk... Fine, I'll do it now if nobody opposes. ... No opposition? Okay, here goes I. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:12, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Go on, change it! --Alex9891 (user) 23:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I did the BB06 Australia one earlie... it would be yesterday now... I did the BB06 Australia table yesterday, so now it's just up to the Big Brother UK ones to follow. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like it. —JD[don't talk|email] 15:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- JD has a point, now that it's nearing the end it's just looking pretty messy. --LorianTC 16:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
NOOOOOOOO!!! IMHO it looks horrible!! godgoddingham333 23:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Gah, you should have opposed like 6 minutes ago. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Who's doing the others? Me? —JD[don't talk|email] 23:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's one of my points. If we do this (please no!), then all of the Big Brother noms tables are gonna have to be changed! Anyway, it looks hideous. All the red is in the bottom right and it makes it look all boxy... godgoddingham333 23:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind doing the others; how many are there? Six? Five? And I think it looks worse when there's random bars of red and lighter red (pink?) going at all lengths across my monitor. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- 6, yeh. But then there's BBAU and BBUS and CBB and BB woteva else... Well, yeh, that's your opinion. Mine is it looks worse with all the red in the bottom right... godgoddingham333 23:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- The American ones were done like that from the get-go, and there's only one for the Big Brother Australia articles. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well anyway, IMO it looks worse and should be kept as it was. godgoddingham333 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- No it looks just as good, better in fact --Alex9891 (user) 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well anyway, IMO it looks worse and should be kept as it was. godgoddingham333 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- The American ones were done like that from the get-go, and there's only one for the Big Brother Australia articles. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- 6, yeh. But then there's BBAU and BBUS and CBB and BB woteva else... Well, yeh, that's your opinion. Mine is it looks worse with all the red in the bottom right... godgoddingham333 23:30, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind doing the others; how many are there? Six? Five? And I think it looks worse when there's random bars of red and lighter red (pink?) going at all lengths across my monitor. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's one of my points. If we do this (please no!), then all of the Big Brother noms tables are gonna have to be changed! Anyway, it looks hideous. All the red is in the bottom right and it makes it look all boxy... godgoddingham333 23:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Who's doing the others? Me? —JD[don't talk|email] 23:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
I dunno. Maybe I'll like it better when it's finished. I like the BB06 one, but I think that may be because the housemates there were able to keep their mouths shut and thus not get banned, and there were less twists that involved nominations etc... godgoddingham333 00:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ha, you don't know Big Brother Australia at all... Housemates only get banned from nominations if they commit the most obscene of crimes. Otherwise, it's just $5000 AUD knocked off the prize and a visit to the
TorturePunishment Room. And as for twists, my God where do I start? Insiders, Intruders, Infiltrators, Bitchfest 2006, the (one of many) World First(s)... —JD[don't talk|email] 00:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)- No I do; I used to live there. And anyway I said "involving nominations". I know it's usually 5000 AUD, but sometimes if they repeatedly discuss noms then they get banned... godgoddingham333 00:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- They have to discuss it a lot for that to happen, though. They normally get banned from every other thing they could possibly be banned from first. And that's not many things. Anyway, this is going off-topic again. If there's a problem with the rainbow effect, perhaps colours should be toned down a bit. —JD[don't talk|email] 00:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- No it's fine. Leave it. I'm sure it'll be fine at the end of the series anyway... godgoddingham333 00:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okay then. Any objections from the few of us that are A&A, if I or somebody else changes the others? —JD[don't talk|email] 00:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, I've already done the housemates page --Alex9891 (user) 00:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- No. Go ahead and good luck! That's me done for the night. I'm off to get some shut-eye. Nite... godgoddingham333 00:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've just done series 6; I'm going to do
series 5 series 2now. Tra (Talk) 00:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)- I'll do
1 and4. That should be all of them then. —JD[don't talk|email] 00:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)- No fair, I only got to do one :'( Meh. —JD[don't talk|email] 00:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'll do
- I've just done series 6; I'm going to do
- No. Go ahead and good luck! That's me done for the night. I'm off to get some shut-eye. Nite... godgoddingham333 00:21, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, I've already done the housemates page --Alex9891 (user) 00:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okay then. Any objections from the few of us that are A&A, if I or somebody else changes the others? —JD[don't talk|email] 00:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- No it's fine. Leave it. I'm sure it'll be fine at the end of the series anyway... godgoddingham333 00:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- They have to discuss it a lot for that to happen, though. They normally get banned from every other thing they could possibly be banned from first. And that's not many things. Anyway, this is going off-topic again. If there's a problem with the rainbow effect, perhaps colours should be toned down a bit. —JD[don't talk|email] 00:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- No I do; I used to live there. And anyway I said "involving nominations". I know it's usually 5000 AUD, but sometimes if they repeatedly discuss noms then they get banned... godgoddingham333 00:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Ha ha. I did 3!! He he. I gotta get some sleep now. Good editing tonight! Well Done JD UK, Tra and Alex 9891!! Night all! godgoddingham333 00:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yay! I did 3 as well: series 6 and the two on CBB. Tra (Talk) 00:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Celebrity Big Brother has the tables!? :( Now I'm sad. —JD[don't talk|email] 00:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yay! I did 3 as well: series 6 and the two on CBB. Tra (Talk) 00:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
When Nikki goes back in...
When Nikki goes back into the House, does she get moved up to the date of her second eviction? Or does she get left where she is now? I'd be guessing she'll be getting bumped up the table, assuming it's staying the way it is now. But it's always good to ask, no matter how many people I piss off in the process. —JD[don't talk|email] 23:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hopefully it'll be back the way it was before, but if not, then she gets moved to whenever she gets evicted again. (Probs third place I reckon)... If it's back the way it was, we don't have to worry about things like this tho'!! godgoddingham333 23:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- You mean, "In a real Big Brother world, we don't have to worry about things like this." I mean, who put an evicted housemate back in, just to answer the public's moaning? Going a bit off-topic there... —JD[don't talk|email] 23:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Do you mean if she does? --Alex9891 (user) 23:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure... If... We all know she has just as good a chance as anybody of getting back into that House... —JD[don't talk|email] 23:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- She's blatantly going back in. I'm willing to bet my house, my bank account, my school! It's a dead-cert! godgoddingham333 23:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Lol, her Lisa, Grace and one other... :) --Alex9891 (user) 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno bout Lisa. I reckon Nikki, Jayne, Grace and Lea. But the housemates will choose Nikki. godgoddingham333 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I hate to sound like, well, anybody really, but: Wikipedia is WP:NOT a discussion forum. Please stay on-topic with discussions, or piss off somewhere else with 'em! —JD[don't talk|email] 23:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Aha but it was you who brought it up ;) --Alex9891 (user) 23:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Grumble grumble... —JD[don't talk|email] 23:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Aha but it was you who brought it up ;) --Alex9891 (user) 23:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- I hate to sound like, well, anybody really, but: Wikipedia is WP:NOT a discussion forum. Please stay on-topic with discussions, or piss off somewhere else with 'em! —JD[don't talk|email] 23:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno bout Lisa. I reckon Nikki, Jayne, Grace and Lea. But the housemates will choose Nikki. godgoddingham333 23:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Lol, her Lisa, Grace and one other... :) --Alex9891 (user) 23:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- She's blatantly going back in. I'm willing to bet my house, my bank account, my school! It's a dead-cert! godgoddingham333 23:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure... If... We all know she has just as good a chance as anybody of getting back into that House... —JD[don't talk|email] 23:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
How will the table be edited to show the evicted housemate back in? Will the red evicted box be merged shorter, and the Week 12 filled with "Next Door" and the Week 13 with their final position? I made a quick mock-up (using Pete and Nikki, whilst I want them in the final two, I did check on Oddschecker and thet are the two favourites to win)
| Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete | In Big Brotherhood |
Imogen, Sezer |
Lisa, Nikki |
No nominations |
Imogen, Lisa |
Susie, Aisleyne |
Banned | No nominations |
Spiral, Michael |
Michael | Imogen, Aisleyne |
HM1, HM2 |
Winner |
| Nikki | In Big Brotherhood |
Lea, Grace |
Richard, Sam |
No nominations |
Lisa | Aisleyne, Susie |
Richard, Lea |
No nominations |
Evicted (Day 58) |
Next Door | 2nd place | ||
- These are the last two weeks? If they are, the last column could just be split into two, and something could be done with the penultimate cell. --
JD don't talk email me 11:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)- Looks ok to me. --Alex9891 11:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- There'd be nothing to show that Nikki went back in, only that she went from being most hated in Week 9 to runner up. --
JD don't talk email me 11:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)- Actually, looking at it again, the fact that the bar doesn't go all the way across the table should be enough. Alex is right; it probably will be okay. --
JD don't talk email me 11:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)- Everything can be explained below in a note, if it doesn't look too clear --Alex9891 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks good to me but technically "Next Door" is wrong because the nominations were yesterday and nobody is Next Door yet. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Everything can be explained below in a note, if it doesn't look too clear --Alex9891 11:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, looking at it again, the fact that the bar doesn't go all the way across the table should be enough. Alex is right; it probably will be okay. --
- There'd be nothing to show that Nikki went back in, only that she went from being most hated in Week 9 to runner up. --
- Looks ok to me. --Alex9891 11:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- And it should REALLY look like this:
| Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikki | In Big Brotherhood |
Lea, Grace |
Richard, Sam |
No nominations |
Lisa | Aisleyne, Susie |
Richard, Lea |
No nominations |
Evicted (Day 58) |
Next Door | Winner | ||
| Pete | In Big Brotherhood |
Imogen, Sezer |
Lisa, Nikki |
No nominations |
Imogen, Lisa |
Susie, Aisleyne |
Banned | No nominations |
Spiral, Michael |
Michael | Imogen, Aisleyne |
HM1, HM2 |
2nd place |
- Surely, you mean whinger, not winner. Could someone that dull and annoying really win BB?
- Yes, it should, but alas, the sympathy vote! Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 11:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes very nice :/ --Alex9891 11:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- What have I started... --
JD don't talk email me 11:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)- Will all the four evictees that go in tonight have "Next Door" for Week 12? If they do, what will happen if Mikey and/or Susie go in? Their "Week 12" box is filled with "Evicted". Squidward2602 11:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- As I said, Next Door is wrong because nominations took place yesterday. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- No they won't. It's a nominations table, nominations happen on Monday, they weren't in the house during nominations so Week 12 will remain "evicted" (in my opinion). — FireFox (talk) 11:58, 8 August '06
- Agree with FireFox, but it'll need explaining. --Alex9891 12:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Will all the four evictees that go in tonight have "Next Door" for Week 12? If they do, what will happen if Mikey and/or Susie go in? Their "Week 12" box is filled with "Evicted". Squidward2602 11:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it should, but alas, the sympathy vote! Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 11:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Should the ex-housemates up for the public vote be listed somewhere? The "Against Public Vote" will be filled later with this week's nominations, but the ex-housemates are "nominated" currently according to the Big Brother website. Extention of note 11, maybe? Squidward2602 12:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes to everything :) --Alex9891 12:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- The 3 people in the House Next Door that aren't picked to go into the main house would therefore be evicted 'again' in a similar way to how Jonathon was evicted. If this happened to say, Grace, it would look like this: Tra (Talk) 14:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes to everything :) --Alex9891 12:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
| Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 | Week 7 | Week 8 | Week 9 | Week 10 | Week 11 | Week 12 | Week 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace | In Big Brotherhood |
Lea, Richard |
Aisleyne, Sam |
No nominations |
Evicted (Day 30) |
Evicted (Day 86) | |||||||
- Could be "re-evicted"? --Alex9891 14:29, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Housmates in alphabetical order
If the housemates are put in alphabetical order, then we would know who nominated in what order, they always nominate in alphabetical order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonPeter (talk • contribs)
- Nominations in Big Brother Australia weren't always in alphabetical order, so the order of housemates is meaningless on that table. On the UK ones, does it actually matter what order the housemates nominated in? It's not about the order nominations were made in, it's about who got kicked out each week. That's what Big Brother is about. --JD don't talk email me 16:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- The order the housemates nominate is not really that important because nothing is revealed until all housemates have nominated, therefore one person's nominations have no influence on the other housemates. The housemates are listed in order of eviction because it looks clearer. When you read down the columns, you are not interrupted by the red bars going across, because they are all at the end. Tra (Talk) 16:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
This is Britain, not Australia
Nominations table series 1
Why isn't there a nominations table for series 1, series 1 and 2 of celebrity big brother, and also for teen big brother. The nominations for teen big brother, are on the main teen big brother website.
- See my reply on the Talk:Big Brother nominations table (UK series 2)... godgoddingham333 18:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- What about teen big brother? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonPeter (talk • contribs)
- Dunno. Make it if you want. BTW, please sign your name after any comments made on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. godgoddingham333 18:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have most of the series 1 nominations but not all of them, or I'd have done it when I did series 2 and 3... -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno. Make it if you want. BTW, please sign your name after any comments made on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. godgoddingham333 18:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- What about teen big brother? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonPeter (talk • contribs)