Redvers
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for the images
Thank you very much for making both of the images for me. I like both of them very much, but I am going to go with the second, more exciting one. Again, thank you very much!--Chili14 01:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering...
are you any good at user page design? even if your not could you please take a look at the comment I left my user page creator and see if you can get your head round it?! JiMoThYTALK
Thanks
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. --Wildnox 16:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Unblock of User:Rifleman_82
Hi! Thanks for helping unblock me! --Rifleman 82 19:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
apologies
I Understand that Redvers, nothing of the sort will happen again. Oh and don't worry I do not intend to copy the homework, I intend to use it to find out what it was we were supposed to be doing and i can then write my own, it would be stupid to copy courseork! expecially when we're in the same class and are both 7 weeks late handing it in!
Barnstar
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
To Redvers and pgk for extraordinary perseverance in getting me unblocked. Dave 20:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for September 11th.
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 37 | 11 September 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
Carnildo resysopped | Report from the Hungarian Wikipedia |
News and notes | Features and admins |
Bugs, Repairs, and International Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for changing the block!
Well, that kind of says it... Thanks! Ansell 09:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
AIV removal
The user I reported was blatant. Please see history of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. They uploaded an image that got speedied so you didn't see it in the edit history. All those users are the same vandal and should all be blocked indef. Those other edits were dummy edits to trick people into thinking they aren't a vandal. VegaDark 11:26, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, it did apply. I gave them the BV template after their first obvious act of vandalism of changing the image. They then proceeded to change the image again, 3 minutes after I had already warned them. So posting was appropriate on AIV. I think my accusation of them also being a sock was obvious, and I think the fact another admin indefinitely blocked the account in question (whereas you removed them from AIV without even a temp block, which would have been justified even if they hadn't been a sock IMO) supports that. Obvious socks are reported on AIV all the time (wether it officially should be or not), WP:SSP is used for not-so obvious socks. VegaDark 12:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Redvers
Tanks Redvers, you helped me now I will take your advice! I was wondering how you became an administrator, you must have worked really hard to get that. Masier 15:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanx, Redvers
Thanx, Redvers for welcoming me.
Bro, how does your signature lookin like that. Is there any way to make it look different ? Bye. Take care. --Hernan Javier 16:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thanks!
thanks for changing our school's block to anon only. it means real wiki users can still contribute! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr zoidberg590 (talk • contribs) .
A question..
Is there an official warning for users that have created nonsense pages purely as tests, that can be put on there talk page, if so what is the template?