Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mythical creature hierarchy
- Deleting administrator should remember to delete the image along with the article.
Contested prod, if you can believe that. Original prod reason was "Completely unsourced and unverifiable, severely POV ("by far the most awesome mystical being?"), verges on patent nonsense" VoiceOfReason 06:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Outright original research. --physicq210 06:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Idea created in a day on a piece of paper --ArmadilloFromHell 06:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Research doesn't get more original than this. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and also no contest: Cerberus is the best mythical creature - Three heads, people! ;-) Onebravemonkey 08:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, unless we can establish a consensus to place me at the top of the hierarchy. My Alt Account 08:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I think I may have done something like that myself back in my younger days. It made me smile, which so few AfD nominated articles ever do. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 09:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, opiniated essay. Not encyclopedic. - Mgm|(talk) 09:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete either nonsense or original research. Noone seems to be stepping up and even claiming one could try to provide sources. Lundse 13:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, if you want a source for something... anything related, there is one for the hierarchy of dragons in D&D. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Our thunderbird article clearly states that the thunderbirds beat up the dragons. So there! - Smerdis of Tlön 14:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOR... and the handwritten web diagram pushes this into BJAODN territory. the whole article and image should be sent there... Gnomes rule!--Isotope23 16:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)