Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul

< Stewards | confirm | 2009
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Dungodung (talk | contribs) at 15:32, 22 December 2007 (+link. Stewards/confirm/discussion2007 is not linked from anywhere). It may differ significantly from the current version.
Deutsch:

Die Bestätigung 2007 hat beendet.

Die Wahlen 2007 sind eine gute Gelegenheit herauszufinden, ob wir nach wie vor mit den derzeitigen Stewards zufrieden sind. Um diesen Prozess so einfach wie möglich zu gestalten, sind die Dinge folgendermaßen organisiert:

Wenn Du (als Wähler) während der Stewards/elections 2007 mit einem der unten gelisteten Personen unzufrieden sein solltest, so erwähne es bitte. Du kannst zum Beispiel anmerken, dass die Person ein inaktiver Steward ist. Oder du kannst das Verhalten des Betreffenden beanstanden.

Inaktive Stewards, wie in diesem Grundsatz definiert, werden ihres Status entzogen.

Am Ende der Wahlen werden die jetztigen Stewards (die alten und die neuen) auf dieser Seite hinterlassene Beschwerden berücksichtigen und mit Hilfe der Kommentare der Gemeinschaft und ihrer eigenen Perspektive und Kenntnis über diese Aufgabe, den Stewardstatus entfernen.

Alle Stewards müssen nach jeder Wahl diesen Prozess durchmachen.


English:

The 2007 confirmation has ended.

The 2007 steward elections are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

During the 2007 elections, please mention if you are unhappy with one of the persons listed below and why. For example, you may mention inactivity or negative behavior. Inactive stewards, as stated in the steward policies, will lose their steward access.

At the end of the elections, the current and newly elected stewards will consider complaints left on this page, and choose to remove stewardship as necessary taking into account both the comments left by community and their own perspective and understanding of the job. All stewards will go through this process after each election.

See also:

Español :

La confirmación 2007 ha terminado.

Las elecciones del 2007 a stewards son una buena oportunidad para ver si aún estamos contentos con nuestros steward actuales. Para facilitar el proceso, así es como se organizarán las cosas:

Durante la elección 2007, menciona si estás descontento con alguna de las personas listadas debajo y porqué. Por ejemplo, puedes mencionar inactividad o comportamiento negativo. Los stewards inactivos, de acuerdo a las políticas de steward, perderán su acceso.

Al final de la elección, los stewards actuales, junto con los nuevos, considerarán las quejas en esta página y decidirán eliminar el estado steward según sea necesario, tomando en cuenta tanto los comentarios de la comunidad como la propia perspectiva y entendimiento del trabajo. Todos los stewards pasarán por este proceso después de cada elección.

Ver también:

Bahasa Indonesia:

Konfirmasi 2007 telah dimulai.

Pemilihan Steward 2007 adalah kesempatan yang baik untuk meyakinkan apakah komunitas masih mendukung para Steward yang bertugas saat ini. Untuk memastikan kelancaran prosesnya, berikut adalah bagaimana berbagai hal diatur.

Selama pemilihan 2007, harap sebutkan jika Anda merasa salah satu pengguna yang terdaftar di bawah ini sudah tidak tepat lagi sebagai Steward dan alasannya. Sebagai contoh, Anda dapat menyebutkan alasan ketidakaktifan atau perilaku yang negatif. Para steward non-aktif, sebagaimana kebijakan mengenai steward, akan kehilangan akses teknis stewardnya.

Pada akhir pemilihan, para Steward saat ini dan yang terpilih harus mempertimbangkan keluhan-keluhan yang dituliskan di halaman ini, dan dapat memilih untuk menanggalkan status stewardnya atas komentar-komentar dari komunitas serta perspektif dan pengertian mereka sendiri akan tugas mereka sebagai steward. Seluruh steward akan melalui proses ini setelah suatu pemilihan berkahir.

Lihat juga:

日本語：

2007年スチュワード信任投票は、あなたが現在のスチュワードに満足しているかどうか確認するよい機会です。この信任作業を出来る限り円滑に進めるため、以下の点にご留意ください。

2007年信任投票受付期間に、もし下記にリストアップされた現在のスチュワードに対する不満がおありでしたら、その旨明記し、不満の理由をおかきください。たとえば不活発であるとか、問題行動などです。不活発なスチュワードはsteward policiesに明記されているように、スチュワード権限を失います。

信任投票の終わりに、現在のスチュワードと新しく信任されたスチュワードはこのページに記された苦情を考慮し、コミュニティからのコメントとスチュワードとしての見解また仕事についての理解の双方に基づき、必要と判断された場合にスチュワード権限を取り除きます。すべてのスチュワードは信任投票ごとにこの過程を経て考査されます。

こちらもご覧下さい:


Nederlands:

De bevestiging van 2007 heeft beëindigd.

De stewardverkiezingen van 2007 zijn een goede kans om te controleren of we wel nog steeds "gelukkig" zijn met onze huidige stewards.

Om het zo vlot mogelijk te laten verlopen, vindt je hier hoe alles is georganiseerd.

Gedurende de verkiezingen van 2007, gelieve te zeggen of je ongelukking bent met een van onze personen hieronder en zeg ook waarom. Bijvoorbeeld, je kan inactiviteit of slecht gedrag aanhalen. Inactieve stewards, zoals er staat in het stewardbeleid, zullen hun stewardtoegang verliezen.

Op het einde van de verkiezingen, zullen de huidige en de nieuw verkozen stewards de klachten die achtergelaten zijn op deze pagina overwegen, en kiezen om het stewardschap te verwijderen wanneer nodig rekening houdend met zowel de opmerkingen achtergelaten door de gemeenschap als hun eigen zicht en kennis op de zaak. Alle stewards zullen door dit proces gaan na elke verkiezing.

Zie ook:

Português :

A confirmação 2007 terminou

As eleições de 2007 para o cargo de Steward representam uma boa oportunidade para que se verifique se nós ainda estamos satisfeitos com os nossos atuais Stewards. Para que o processo corra o mais tranqüilamente possível, eis como as coisas foram organizadas.

Durante as eleições 2007, por favor mencione qualquer eventual insatisfação em relação a alguma das pessoas listadas abaixo e o porquê. Você pode citar, por exemplo, inatividade ou comportamento negativo. Conforme descrito nas políticas aplicáveis aos Stewards, os Stewards inativos perderão o status.

Ao final das eleições, os Stewards atuais e os recentemente eleitos considerarão as reclamações feitas nesta página e decidirão sobre se renunciarão ao status, levando em consideração tanto os comentários deixados pela comunidade como o seu próprio entendimento da função. Todos os Stewards têm de passar por este processo, após cada eleição.

Veja também:

VOTING IS NOW FINISHED. ANY FURTHER VOTES WILL BE REMOVED AND DISCOUNTED.

Current Steward List as of confirmation process start

For reference, this was the list of current stewards as given by Special:Listusers/steward, prior to 21 December.

(exempt from reconfirmation: Brion VIBBER, Jimbo Wales, Kate, RobH and Tim Starling )

Note: This is the confirmation of existing stewards page. If you want to comment on new steward candidates see Stewards/elections 2007.


Individual Comments

Angela

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Angela

Comments about Angela

  1. Seems highly appropriate to me that Angela be reconfirmed, regardless of activity level. When she's had time to do so, she's acted with wisdom and fairness, keeping consensus in mind. Not having her be around on the private lists to counsel newer stewards seems a major loss. ++Lar: t/c 10:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I concur with Lar's comments, activity is not the sole criteria and certainly not for this user --Herby talk thyme 13:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Angela still remains a steward in good standing and maintains activity. Cary Bass demandez 16:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. While Angela is currently less active than before, she was once the most active stewards as well as Anthere. Wisdom with a vast amount of experiences shouldn't be underestimated. And still, as Cary pointed out, she is engaged in maintenance. --Aphaia 20:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Angela has been incredibly helpful and useful over at en:w, and she will likely continue to be so here, too. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 03:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Angela has been the most Active steward before and and as pointed out above, her experiences and wisdom is far greater than most other younger stewards and I believe she will do her job as a Steward when called upon and thus deserves to keep her bit...--Cometstyles 11:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Imho low activity does not mean inactivity, her skills are still needed. Very helpful and friendly, thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I still want you here! I think you deserve to be exempted from the reconfirmation. --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Not that active, but is still occasionally around. Fine to reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 18:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes Anthere 23:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lar's comments pretty much mirror my own. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes, per Lar. ElinorD 22:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. I agree with Lar. Acalamari 18:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support. Lar said it well --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Why not? 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 23:05, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
  18.   Support remaining a steward.--Jusjih 03:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes please! – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support for her confirmation. --LadyInGrey 15:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Ahonc 12:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anthere

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Anthere

Comments about Anthere

  1. Positive comments are not required to keep access, but I would be remiss not to mention the positive contributions our chairman has made over the years. As with Angela, she may not be that active but when she is, she acts wisely and well, and not having her on the private lists would be a loss to other stewards. ++Lar: t/c 10:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I see no reason why Anthere should not be confirmed and quite a few why she should as Lar's comments --Herby talk thyme 13:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Florence has maintained an activity level and left no reason to doubt her ability to steward. Cary Bass demandez 16:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. While Anthere is currently less active than before, she was once the most active stewards as well as Angela. Wisdom with a vast amount of experiences shouldn't be underestimated. And still, as Cary pointed out, she is engaged in maintenance including officewiki and other highly confidential wikis. --Aphaia 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. As Herby mentions, I can't see any reason not to confirm Anthere's stewardship Gaillimh 00:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I agree with the other comments here: Anthere is a very worthwhile and helpful steward and should keep the twiddled bit. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 03:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. As per lar and she has been quite inactive but as chair of the foundation and with her vast array of experience and leadership, she should be reconfirmed without much opposition as mentioned above, their is no reason to doubt her ability as a steward...--Cometstyles 11:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Anthere is often available through irc and therefore she can be reached in case of emergencies (which was the case just a short while ago). I highly recommend to reconfirm her, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. She is only semi-active, but she is often available in case anyone is ever needed. As her position as board chair, using steward rights on an "official" basis may be useful. Fine to reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 18:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Helpful, approachable, and most unlikely to abuse her stewardship. Does it really matter if she hasn't been terribly active lately? ElinorD 22:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Absolument irréprochable. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 15:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Absolutely irreproachable." —translated by Pathoschild.
  12. I see no reason to remove her stewardship. Acalamari 18:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Why not? 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 23:06, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
  16. Support: I agree with Cary's and Majorly's opinions. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support--Jusjih 01:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mike Godwin's Request for Adminship could have become a very ugly situation, but Anthere handled it extremely well. Should remain a steward for moments like this. --JayHenry 22:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support She doesn't get that many opportunities to muck on the wikis anymore, I wouldn't want to take this one away! ;) --Gribeco 00:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support of course Bapti 11:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support --Ahonc 13:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ausir

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Ausir

Comments about Ausir

  1. Largely inactive as far as I can see --Herby talk thyme 09:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Special:Log/rights seems to show last steward activity in June of this year. Did not update information above, even after being reminded. Regrettably, is probably inactive and probably should not be reconfirmed unless circumstances change. ++Lar: t/c 12:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. He has been active on a non-wikimedia project after June so I believe he is around but if he wants to concentrate on other projects only, I don't think he needs the tools anymore..--Cometstyles 11:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Inactive, so no point in reconfirming. Majorly (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Inactive, remove. xaosflux Talk 05:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Inactive.--Jusjih 01:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bastique

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Bastique

Comments about Bastique

  1. A very hard working coordinator who has served the projects well. It will be very useful for him to retain stewardship. ++Lar: t/c 12:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. He's just a lovely, hard-working person who clearly still needs steward tools. Arria Belli | parlami 20:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. His "愛" is nice, therefore he deserves to remaine Steward. Schiste 21:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. --Aphaia 22:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Confermo! --Nick1915 - all you want 00:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Confirm!" —translated by Pathoschild.
  6. Good fellow, seems reasonable for him to hold onto his stewardship Gaillimh 00:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Only concern is he might get more wikiaddicted than he already is - no studies have been done on the health consequences of Wikipedia. -- Tawker 00:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. It has taken me a while to get to this (think of something nice to say abot Cary - quick). The Foundation is fortunate to have someone as hard working and competent as Cary. Helpful and responsive (when not rushed off his feet) with a sense of humour - I appreciate what he does --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bah, who needs him :P ..hehe..I believe this guy is the leader of all the Stewards and most if not all Stewards look up to him for advice and see him as their mentor and thus his "god-like" prowess should continue for years to come :P ..--Cometstyles 11:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. (+)! --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Please stay in your post! We still need you! And I think you deserve to be exempted from this reconfirmation,as you have the authority to check our identities ;-) --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. One of the best stewards, imo. Plenty active enough, and his position with the Foundation requires him to have steward rights for some situations. Definitely reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ok. Simplicius 22:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. sure Anthere 23:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Needs it. John Reaves (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Active and hard-working. ElinorD 22:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Very active, helpful, reconfirm. xaosflux Talk 05:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Good user; highly useful. Acalamari 18:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Oh man, I've got to support Cary, what with him being the only Wikipedian I've met face-to-face. -- Donald Albury 03:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Tem feito um grande trabalho. Confirmo. Alex Pereira falaê 14:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "He have done a great job. Confirm." —translated by Alex Pereira falaê .
  22. The best there is. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 23:07, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
  23.   Support Miranda 02:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. support: steward status is very useful for him, even if he doesn't use it very often. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 21:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. support--Jusjih 03:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support --Gribeco 00:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support as Arria and schiste Bapti 11:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support --Ahonc 13:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Cspurrier

Comments about Cspurrier

  1. Craig has maintained an activity level and has behaved according to Steward policies. I have complete confidence in him. Cary Bass demandez 16:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No issues, reconfirm. xaosflux Talk 05:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support and thanks for all your good work! Not as widely known as some other celebrity Wikimedians on this list, but still incredibely helpful. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support--Jusjih 02:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. While I don't agree with him always, he is generally trusted and of integrity. --Aphaia 05:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mayer

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Daniel Mayer

Comments about Daniel Mayer

  1. Daniel acts in accordance with Steward policy and has maintained a decent activity level. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 16:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support--Jusjih 01:53, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Darkoneko

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Darkoneko

Comments about Darkoneko

  1. Support. A user who isn't afraid of saying it like it is when needed and who has still managed to stay nice. He will make good use of the steward tools. Arria Belli | parlami 20:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC) PS. *gratgrat*[reply]
  2. Awesome steward. Very helpful. Always available when needed. Cary Bass demandez 23:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. *pets Darkoneko* Good steward and feline.--Shanel 00:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Helpful - good steward, nice person --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Helpful, active, friendly, available through IRC, did I mention helpful yet? - Thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 'pets Darkoneko' Good Steward, well behaved hard-working ( drinks milk and sleeps all day, typical) and he has been performing his duties well as a steward in terms of cross-wiki checkusering vandals and spambot and has been a great 'accomplice' of drini..--Cometstyles 11:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I still want you here, you're such a helpful person! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support. For your vandalblock in mlwiki. --Jacob 17:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Very friendly and helpful steward. Definitely reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. oui Anthere 23:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "af,da,de,fo,nl,nn,no,sv: ja / en: yes / is: já" —translated by Effeietsanders, Pathoschild, Spacebirdy.
  11. Very helpful and hardworking. John Reaves (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. strongly oppose Je m'oppose à la confirmation de l'intéressé : je n'ai plus aucune confiance en lui notamment en ce qui concerne son attitude comme Bureaucrate sur WP où il a pris certaines libertés : prolongation illicite pour le vote pour la candidature d'un admin, prise en compte de vote hors délais. De plus, ayant fait preuve de grossièretés à mon égard lors dudit sysopage, ceci ne milite pas du tout en sa faveur. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "I oppose the subject's confirmation: I no longer have any confidence in him, notably concerning his attitude as a bureaucrat on Wikipedia where he has taken certain liberties: illicit extension of a user's adminship vote, counting votes posted beyond the deadline. Furthermore, having demonstrated vulgarities towards me in the aforementioned situation, this does not bode well at all in his favour." —translated by Shanel and Pathoschild.
  14. Support: from time to time, I'm against cat's opinions (or actions), but what I know about the most of his stuff as a steward helps me to think he should still bring help in this job. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. support volontaire et des bonnes idées. --P@d@w@ne 09:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support--clamengh 12:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. support Helpful and friendly (For B. Grondin : What is the link between his actions as bureaucrat on WP-fr and his confirmation as Steward on Meta ?) --Moumine 15:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support--Jusjih 01:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support we need more grumpy kitties around here! --Gribeco 00:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support Bapti 11:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support --Ahonc 13:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Dbl2010

Comments about Dbl2010

  2. Dbl2010, sometimes aka 2011 on irc, has been a very reliable user and an asset to us wherever he is active, knowledgeable and trustworthy; i support reconfirming him as a steward to the wmf projects. oscar 18:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support--clamengh 12:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support--Jusjih 01:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Anthere 23:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support -- We'd like to see more of you though. Cary Bass demandez 23:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drini

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Drini

Comments about Drini

  2. The best cross-wiki vandal fighter around. We need drini to keep his steward bit. Cary Bass demandez 23:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yep, having Drini retain his stewardship sounds good to me Gaillimh 00:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I strongly support Drini. He's always very helpful. 日本穣 Nihonjoe 03:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. The work Drini has been carrying out has be very useful indeed and not merely to the projects he has working on. The daylog in now on a number of peoples watchlists and is extremely helpful to people concerned with cross wiki issues. Drini may not be the best communicator but he is one of the hardest workers. --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. He is the BEST cross-wiki vandal and Spam fighter I have ever seen and without him our small team will lose a great leader so Please no matter what happens, this guy should retain his Steward bit cause all the hopes and dreams of all small wikis lie in the hands of this guy and as Herby mentioned, this guy is a Silent-killer (silent yet deadly) :P ...--Cometstyles 11:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Without Drini, lots of projects would drown into a deep swamp of misery. Thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. You're a great vandal fighter! Continue to be a Steward and continue to use your superpower and fight vandalism haha --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Strong Support to the cross-wiki vandal fighter.. --Jacob 17:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. We definitely need to keep Drini around. Daylog is one of the most useful page on meta. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 19:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Very hard working spam fighter. We'd be lost without him. Definitely reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yep, per Majorly--Nick1915 - all you want 23:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. He's an excellent vandal fighter and steward who should be definitely confirmed. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Jaranda | wat's sup 00:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. I admire his cross-wiki vandalism fighting efforts. Great work, Drini. --Meno25 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hardworking, helpful, reconfirm. xaosflux Talk 05:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. confirm without him acting as a multiproject pestbuster Wikimedia world would be a very worse place to enjoy. I trust him, so long stay Drini! - εΔω 06:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  19. Excellent user: reconfirm. Acalamari 18:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I've come across this user's vandal fighting work on wuu:, and nevertheless helpful. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 23:08, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
  23. Patient and helpful. Arria Belli | parlami 02:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support Miranda 02:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. I have spotted him on several small Finnish-language Wikimedia projects, so he seems to be doing his job. –Ejs-80 03:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support --Mushii 19:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support for the confirmation. --LadyInGrey 15:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support for this spam fighter. - PAhles 21:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support--Jusjih 01:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Without a doubt   Support. I've seen him busting vandals on many different projects. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support Major vandal-buster --Gribeco 00:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. It is nice to have a steward like him who has sincere concerns on small projects, including less notable Wikipedia sisters. --Aphaia from Wikiquote 05:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support very good work Bapti 11:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Effeietsanders

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Effeietsanders

Comments about Effeietsanders

  2. I am afraid I'm trapped in WP:COI due to my affliation hence have not to say anything here but <pov>he is a very trusted person and always helpful.</pov> --Aphaia 04:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Always available on IRC and always willing to help and I will be glad to see him back :) ..--Cometstyles 11:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Very friendly and helpful and active user, thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Very active steward, has been good at his job; also possessive of very high standards of stewardship. Cary Bass demandez 14:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Active, and helpful when needed. Fine to reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Agree with Cary's comments completely --Herby talk thyme 20:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sure!--Nick1915 - all you want 00:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support--Jusjih 01:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Bapti 11:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Oppose --Ahonc 12:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

guillom

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/guillom

Comments about guillom

  2. (French) Bien qu'ayant exprimé de sérieux doutes envers guillom l'an passé, je pense que son action n'a pas été négative en tant que steward, et suggère sa reconduction / (English) Although I have expressed some strong doubts on guillom last year, I think that his action as a steward was not negative. As a consequence, I suggest that he can be confirmed as a steward. Grimlock 09:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I strongly support guillom's confirmation. Meodudlye 17:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Lovely and helpful. Arria Belli | parlami 20:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Confirming guillom sounds good to me. Cheers Gaillimh 00:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Definitely reconfirm.--Shanel 00:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gosh yes. ++Lar: t/c 03:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Helpful & communicative - no problems --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. He helped revive the SWMT and has since been helping out a lot and it will be good to see him back as a Steward <<<The picture of the bear on his userpage scares me though>> :P .....--Cometstyles 11:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Without even the smallest quark of doubt I would like to endorse him, thanks guillom, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Without guillom I would be lost. Cary Bass demandez 14:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. We've had our differences, but he's a hard worker, and a good steward, and I have no problem with him being reconfirmed. Majorly (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. guillom mérite sa reconduction en tant que steward, statut auquel il a su faire honneur.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Guillom deserves his confirmation as steward, status to which he has done honor." —translated by Pathoschild.
  15. I would appreciate it if you'd explain this action and offensive wording in edit summary.[2] --朝彦 (Asahiko) 15:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I explained and apologized here. guillom 15:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    "Canvassing", "now thery're exporting their hate"... Seriously, does that look like an "apology" to you? I do not wish to confirm any steward who makes comments like that in an international project. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 14:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    While some amount of mutual misunderstandings due to the language or cultural barriers might be inevitable, I take back my opposal after reading this, with hopes that a similar matter will not repeat itself hereafter. --朝彦 (Asahiko) 16:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. of course!--Nick1915 - all you want 15:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. I will never forget you who wrote "japanese idiots" in the summary column. It is not a dialog that man in a public standpoint may say in a public place in any case though it is necessary to esteem individual thought and the creed. --Hatara Kei 12:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll not defend him as such & I warned him at the time. However, in the heat of argument such as there was on that page, for a human being it was wrong but pardonable in my view. I've worked with guillon across projects, he is a very good steward in my view, a lapse in this way is sad but I would ask that the apology which is sincere is taken into account please. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 12:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The "outburst" was uncharacteristic of guillom, and I'm sure he regrets doing it now. He's apologised, and it should be accepted. Perhaps it may be better for guillom to not comment anymore on Aphaia's candidacy. Thanks. 82.31.11.207 12:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The candidacy is withdrawn so there should be no further comments by anyone, thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry friend, I didn't realise. 82.31.11.207 13:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you say that what sincerity can be expected of the person who assumes details of the thing to be "Now they're exporting their hate to meta." without correctly examining it even in the excuse or the apology? I feel that the language barrier is not got over easily strongly. I wanted the person in the standpoint like him/her to behave after it had investigated carefully in an objective standpoint because of but. --Hatara Kei 14:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Folks, It seems to me: Guillom thinks the Japanese wikipedia contributors are doing bad because they are "canvasing". The Japanese Wikipedia contributors think they are doing good because they are telling the global community something important. Both are potentially valid view points. But did Guillom see the sense of the Japanese Wikipedia community? Forgive me, let me put it this way, does Guillom think the Japanese wikipedians who oppose Aphaia are here simply for vengence? Hillgentleman 01:42, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't believe the Japanese Wikipedians opposed Aphaia for revenge. I believe they have good reasons to do so. Though, I know Aphaia enough to believe that what wass reproached to her must be the result of several misunderstandings, and that her ban was disproportionate. What made me temporarily upset is that ja:wp users didn't seem to be willing to share this view. I felt Aphaia was harassed by this group of ja:wp users, and I felt harassed too when my vote was commented. I have apologized for my badly chosen words, even though I still feel there is a major unfairness in the whole case. guillom 10:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    By the way, where of a current remark of guillom was the apology of Japanese Wikipedian included? At least, words of apology were not found in the range that I had read. Or, is my language ability insufficient for this? Man is a living thing that falls in mistake. However, I think that what action he/she does when committing an offense and the person's nature is clarified. From beginning to end of the excuse based on a personal interpersonal relationship with Aphaia as for a current remark of guillom. I think that he/she doesn't admit a fundamental mistake. Therefore, I fear the possibility of selecting the same action this time when guillom will fall into the same kind of situation this time in the future high. I also admit the problem to be in the action of a part of, Japanese Wikipedian about the Aphaia's election. But, I hope when the fact of having thought that a lot of Japanese who do not want to take part in meta usually cannot help taking part in Aphaia's election also wants you to think. --Hatara Kei 17:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    His (second) apology is to be found here, if You can't forgive it is Your matter, but I hope, You never get into a situation where You did something wrong, and are not forgiven even after sincerly apologizing afterwards. Please end this discussion here (and try to forgive). thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    It consented. I wish to express my gratitude for your point. --Hatara Kei 17:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support: I do not always agree with all guillom's opinions, but I think he makes a good stuff as a steward. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 21:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. support i think he makes a good stuff as a steward (like Hégésippe) --P@d@w@ne 09:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. honoré de   Supporter --clamengh 12:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Honored to support." —translated by Pathoschild.
  21. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support --Gribeco 00:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support--Jusjih 21:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support helpful and lovely. Guillom have done, do and will go on to do very good work on Wikimedia.Bapti 12:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support --Ahonc 13:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      Oppose -- Anonymous000 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)(sorry but I do not have enough time and ability to explain what I think exactly. so I wrote the comment in Japanese.)--Stewards/elections_2007/statements/Aphaiaでの自身の不適切な発言に対する2度の謝罪は、とても真摯で信頼できるものでした。しかしながら、それでもなお、スチュワードへの（再）信任に賛成できません。理由は次の通りです。上記のページでの議論を拝見した限りにおいて、自身の意見の正当性を主張するために、多数の日本語版のコミュニティの利用者の意見に耳を傾けることなく、また、jawpのコミュニティの「コンセンサス」による「無期限ブロックの決定」をも考慮せず、自身のスチュワードの地位もしくは権限、ないし、個人的な経験のみを根拠に判断を下す姿勢は、Steward_policies#Don't decideの規定する、"Their task is to implement valid community decisions"という「ポリシー」に照らして、スチュワードとしては明らかに不適切な判断姿勢であると、私としては考えざるを得ません。申し訳ありません。なお、信任された場合に、将来、日本語版ウィキペディア（等）に関するAphaia氏からの個人的要望があったとしても、日本語版ウィキペディアのコミュニティの意思を確認することなく、何らかのスチュワードとしての行動（権限行使等）を行うことは、決してしないよう、お願いいたします（guillomさんを含む、全てのメタ及びウィキメディア財団の関係者の方々へも）。--Anonymous000 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC) striked (not on time) --Nick1915 - all you want 00:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Harald Søby

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Jon Harald Søby

Comments about Jon Harald Søby

  2. Good fellow indeed. Hard worker as possible as he can. I would like to point hereby out that the logs show that Jon gave higher priority to maintenance tasks than to provide his statement hitherto in his current time-consuming circumstances. Apparently he is now inactive but still he spends his spare time to maintenance tasks ... I admire and appreciate his devotion to the project greatly. --Aphaia 22:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Despite his lack of regular internet access, Jon has continued to help out whenever he can.--Shanel 23:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I've seen him all over the logs in the past, and nothing seems askew, so I heartily endorse his confirmation 00:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  5. Extremely helpful from my contacts --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. One of the first Stewards who I had the pleasure of becoming a guinea pig for and has since then impressed me with his knowledge of the tools even though he is one of the youngest Stewards we have..--Cometstyles 10:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. We need him definitly, thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Stay on! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jon has done a great job as Steward. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 14:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. One of the best, definitely reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Has been extremely helpful on English Wikiquote. Poetlister 22:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. yes Anthere 23:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Good steward, reconfirm. xaosflux Talk 05:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Certainly reconfirm: effective user. Acalamari 18:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support per Herbythyme and Poetlister.--Cato 22:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. support Même avis qu'Anthere.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "support Same opinion as Anthere." —translated by Pathoschild.
  18. Reconfirm. Anthøny 14:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. I had no contacts with him in the recent past, but those I had are worthwhile a decade-long confirnation... honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support--Jusjih 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support --Ahonc 12:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M7

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/M7

Comments about M7

  2. Non posso immaginare RfP senza lui :( --Aphaia 22:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "I can not imagine RfP without him. :(" —translated by Pathoschild.
  3. idem ;)--Nick1915 - all you want 23:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Good steward who I respect greatly and nice with it --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. A great Steward and all this time I thought you were some super spy or something *wink wink* :P ....--Cometstyles 10:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I totally agree with Herby. Thanks M7, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I want you! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. M/ is doing a fine job. Cary Bass demandez 15:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. always kind :) --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Concur with .snoopy., I've never seen him say a bad word about anyone. Definitely reconfirm. Majorly (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes Anthere 23:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. My ideal steward. - εΔω 06:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  14. Ditto above. Anthøny 14:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. support! --Leoman3000 14:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. support--Jusjih 21:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support very good work Bapti 11:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MaxSem

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/MaxSem

Comments about MaxSem

  2. Real hard worker. Small wikis are helped greatly. Must be reconfirmed. --Aphaia 22:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. As Aphaia mentions, MaxSem does great work Gaillimh 00:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Excellent - helpful & responsive --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Helpful, active, available! Thank You, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I want you here! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Maxsem is an excellent steward, who understands policy and is readily available. Cary Bass demandez 18:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Don't see why not. Majorly (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. yup Anthere 23:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. + Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Reconfirm, helpful and hard working. xaosflux Talk 05:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Both MaxSem's work, plus my interactions with him on En.Wiki, have both been positive. Definite reconfirm. Acalamari 18:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support--clamengh 12:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Strong support — VasilievV 2 15:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support--Jusjih 21:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support. He apparently is the most skilled sysop in ru.wiki. Incnis Mrsi 22:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support --Ahonc 12:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. I   Support too. --Obersachse 14:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Oscar

Comments about Oscar

  1. Let's reconfirm the bugger he seems to be usefull every now and then ;) Waerth 20:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. He was always very helpful and imho he should be reconfirmed. Thank You, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I have no doubts about Oscar's ability. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 18:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oscar has been around for a very long time and also served on he "Board of Trustees" and he has been consistent and done so much for the foundation he even sacrificed his hair :P sorry..I Believe he can still perform as a Steward..Reconfirm.--Cometstyles 23:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  5. +Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Entièrement d'accord avec les commentaires ci-dessus.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 15:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "I'm entirely in agreement with the above comments." —translated by Pathoschild.
  7. Support: I think he's a helpful person. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support Alex Pereira falaê 18:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support--Jusjih 21:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support, we can rely on him. Incnis Mrsi 22:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paginazero

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Paginazero

Comments about Paginazero

  2. Stay on! --Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. me lo auguro anche io| I hope to --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 19:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. sì!--Nick1915 - all you want 23:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "yes!" —translated by Pathoschild.
  5. I'm sorry for his recent lack of time: even if the purpose of WikiMedia Italy is mainly the support of Wikimedia projects in Italian language, his position as a Steward could be a loss for WMI, but an advantage for the whole WikiMedia World. In two words: Stay on. - εΔω 06:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  6. support aucun problème pour ma part.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 19:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "en: no problem for my part" —translated by Jusjih.
  7. support--Jusjih 03:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I regret I   Oppose to confirmation.
    Please sign your comment, thanks. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support --Leoman3000 14:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sorry, I cannot support your confirmation, you don't have a correct idea of what collaboration means. --Belinzona 09:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Oppose--10caart 20:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. strong support --Civvi 20:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support --Snowdog 23:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support. --.anaconda 18:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support Incnis Mrsi 23:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support --Ahonc 12:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Whenever help was needed, he helped. --Obersachse 14:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support — VasilievV 2 19:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoschild

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Pathoschild

Comments about Pathoschild

  1. Nice and helpful, even though he refuses to give me a pony.--Shanel 00:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Sympathique et utile, même s'il refuse de m'offrir un poney" —translated by guillom.
  2. Ok for me Grimlock 09:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: OK pour moi" —translated by guillom.
  3. He manage to be with Shannie and still stay alive, so he can't possibly be a bad steward :) DarkoNeko 10:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Il arrive à être avec Shannie et est toujours en vie, donc il ne peut pas être un mauvais steward :)" —translated by guillom.
  4. He is a slave. So he does what his master says, so it's a good steward (and he didn't offered a pony to shannel and that's nice of him) Schiste 12:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: C'est un esclave. Il fait donc ce que lui ordonne son maître, donc c'est un bon steward (et il n'a pas offert de poney à Shanel et c'est gentil de sa part)" —translated by guillom.
  5. Pony/fetish/slavery comments noted, but Pathoschild nevertheless works very hard on many projects. Last entry in User Rights log is from May but that does not tell the entire story of his helpfulness. ++Lar: t/c
    Translation: "fr: J'ai noté les commentaires à propos de poney/fétichisme/esclavage, mais Pathoschild travaille néanmoins très dur sur de nombreux projets. La dernière entrée dans le journal des changements de statut date de mai, mais ça ne dit pas toute l'histoire de son obligeance." —translated by guillom.
    How weird. I'm 99% sure he's changed userrights since then. He was doing a bunch of checkuser requests and bot status requests this month, IIRC. Perhaps his evil has corrupted the user rights log.--Shanel 18:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    He has... this proves it. :-) Maybe there was just a mistake somewhere. :-) Cbrown1023 talk 18:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. Maybe if he's a good steward again this year he'll get more cabbage. Arria Belli | parlami 20:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Soutien. Peut-être que s'il est un bon steward cette année, il obtiendra plus de chou." —translated by guillom, corrigé par Arria Belli (ici je fais référence à un private joke, pas à l'argent).
  7. Helpful, hard work and highly available. Great asset to the community. --Aphaia 20:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Serviable, travaille dur et très disponible. Grand atout pour la communauté" —translated by guillom.
  8. Big concern - has not given Shanel a pony yet. Until Shanel gets a pony I have reservations. </humour> - seriously, no problems whatsoever -- Tawker 00:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Grande inquiétude - n'a pas donné de poney à Shanel. En attendant que Shanel obtienne un poney, j'ai des réserves </humour> Sérieusement, aucun problème" —translated by guillom.
  9. Excellent volunteer for the WMF and its projects. Trustworthy fellow, as well Gaillimh 00:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Excellent bénévole pour la WMF et ses projets. Digne de confiance, également" —translated by guillom.
  10. ...and graceful...--Nick1915 - all you want 00:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: ... et plein de grâce" —translated by guillom.
  11. As DarkoNeko said, he is a "Survivor" and he deserves to live to die another day or was it fight another day :S ...--Cometstyles 10:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr:Comme le dit Darkoneko, c'est un « survivant » et il mérite de vivre pour mourir un autre jour ou était-ce, pour combattre un autre jour :S" —translated by guillom.
  12. Support, user with great technical knowledge. He is available and helpful, thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Soutien, utilisateur doté d'un grand savoir-faire technique. Il est disponible et serviable, merci" —translated by guillom.
  13. Pathoschild is one of the most active stewards we have, and fully understands our policies. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 18:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Pathoschild est un des stewards les plus actifs que nous ayons, et comprend pleinement nos règles. Reconfirmer" —translated by guillom.
  14. This one is a keeper. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 19:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Celui-là est un gardien, faut le garder" —translated by guillom corrected by user:Gribeco.
  15. One of the most active, so a definite keep. Majorly (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Un des plus actifs, donc définitivement à garder" —translated by guillom.
  16. One of the best stewards ever. Strong keep. --Meno25 02:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Un des meilleurs stewards. À garder fortement" —translated by guillom.
  17. Pathos. might work pro bono at the moment, but I'd be willing to pay him to stay on :) bloody-hell-yes reconfirm. Anthøny 19:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Pathos. travaille pro bono pour le moment, mais je serais prêt à le payer pour qu'il reste :) foutrement à reconfirmer,oui" —translated by guillom.
  18. Naturally. John Reaves (talk) 21:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Naturellement" —translated by guillom.
  19. +Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: +" —translated by guillom.
  20. Certainly, xaosflux Talk 05:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Certainement" —translated by guillom.
  21. support for his confirmation. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "fr: Soutien pour sa reconfirmation" —translated by guillom.
  22. Support In interacting with Pathoschild here on Meta, I've found him to not only be very friendly and knowledgeable, but very respectful of opposing viewpoints, striving to find a compromise that best met my concerns and his. A fine steward indeed. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Another excellent user. Acalamari 18:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Strong Support — Very helpful. Especially in the Counter-Vandalism Network. --Cobi 08:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Keep his functions. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   SupportStay back, don't go away! I love you! :-P --Edmund the King of the Woods! 18:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Support Miranda 02:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. I now have concerns w/ Shanel's "baby comment" namely "Now he needs diaper changes and burping every hour" - is this a major cause for concern or am I going nuts :D -- 75.153.80.99 21:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Support: of course. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Support--Jusjih 03:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. honoured to   Support--clamengh 12:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support Alex Pereira falaê 18:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Oppose --Midnight Star 17:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC) And here is the detailed reason: During the 20 months I’m with Wikipedia it happened about 10 times that I turned to a special rights user (steward, bureaucrat or checkuser), each time for a good reason in my view. Except one single time (Angela) I have to report only disapponting expieriences. In half of the cases I was ignored. Once I requested a renaming, and it took 10 days until the responsible bureaucrat responded. That is someone who usually edits Wikipedia 10 hours a day, as far as I see it, and he edited exactly until a few minutes before my request. Some time later the 2 bureaucrates (at that time the only 2 bureaucrates in the second largest WP community, besides) stated towards the community, that there was no need for a third bureaucrat. I think such a statement illustrates how special rights users judge things only from their very own view. After waiting 8 days I turned to a steward for the renaming. The idea was that he could have renamed all my accounts on the miscellaneous wikis, making it unnecessary for me to turn to four different bureaucrats on different wikis. But I was rejected, because „stewards shouldn’t do the bureaucrates jobs...“. In Germany we call that a „Media Markt mentality“, refering to the service personal of Media Markt, who always tell you „that’s not my area, please turn to my colleague“ (usually some very busy colleague then). I criticize that stewards cultivate a policy that lets them permanetly say „this is not my job, turn to someone else“. Now more than two days ago I came to Pathoschild and asked a simple question about a Simple Wikipedia. I asked him, because I want to be discreet – it could be that you actually don’t want new requests for more Simple Wikipedias and also don’t want to have those topics discussed. Meanwhile Phatoschild worked a lot here on Meta (3 periods + one edit), including confirmations of many stewards and playing in his sandbox. It would have cost him maybe half a minute to answer my question, but he didn’t. There was a very similar request before mine, and it only took 7 minutes to be responded. Other than in my case, Phatoschild knows the other querist, I guess. As I have already stated here, requests to special rights users often take much too long to be cared about, especially when you're not an aquaintance or a friend of that special user. Sometimes you can be happy if you don't get ignored. That is a characteristic problem accross the whole Wikimedia Community, and I think most of the senior staff isn't even aware of that. You might think, it is not cool to elaborate on these issues like I did here. But I am really annoyed about these special rights users mentalities, which all lead back to the same core. And certainly there are many people in the communities with similar perceptions. I am just campaigning for to pay some regard to the „little wikipedians“ generally. To maintain Media Markt etc. within Wikimedia might lead to different futurities. One is, that you just free stewards from the need to be reconfirmed. Another is, that you might have not only one, but some 50 or more opposers here next year, and not only opposing one, but all stewards. Thank you for your attention --Midnight Star[reply]
    I have responded on Midnight Star's talk page, where they have not responded in nearly three days. —{admin} Pathoschild 13:51:41, 07 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Support. --Gribeco 00:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Support Bapti 11:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rdsmith4

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Rdsmith4

Comments about Rdsmith4

  2. Hard worker. Perhaps one of the hardest on meta in maintenance area. It is nice to see him offer continuous help. :) --Aphaia 22:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I can only speak to his en-wiki experience, as that's the only project where I've seen him about, but he does great work over there, so it stands to reason that he does great work on meta as a steward, as well Gaillimh 00:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Helpful and needed! Thanks --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Active and diligent steward. Understands policy. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 19:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes Anthere 23:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. I completely support his reconfirmation. --Meno25 02:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes, certainly. xaosflux Talk 05:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. My observations of Rdsmith4's work on En.Wiki have been positive. Acalamari 18:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. support Même avis que Anthere.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 20:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "support Same opinion as Anthere." —translated by Pathoschild.
  11. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. support--Jusjih 19:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redux

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Redux

Comments about Redux

  2. Good fellow, and I think his retention of his stewardship can only benefit the WMF and its various projects Gaillimh 00:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Very open and honest. No problemo here -- Tawker 00:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Helpful and needed! Thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Should be reconfirmed. I wish I'd see him around more often but internet still isn't perfected in some parts of the world :) Cary Bass demandez 14:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tem realizado um bom trabalho. Parabéns. Alex Pereira falaê 14:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "He has done a good job. Congratulations." —translated by Pathoschild.
  7. Vuelva a confirmar. Anthøny 19:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Confirm (literally, return to confirmed status)." —translated by Pathoschild.
  8. Confirm. xaosflux Talk 05:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. A little inactive but if it is based on internet connection problems..then I suppose he should be reconfirmed and as Cary said "internet still isn't perfected in some parts of the world ".. Reconfirm..--Cometstyles 10:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Redux has done excellent work. Acalamari 18:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Redux is an ideal steward who speaks numorous languages. I fully support Redux to serve again in 2008 as a Steward.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 21:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. honoured to   Support--clamengh 13:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support keep up Epinheiro 11:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Aprecio nosso steward lusófono. Vini 175 15:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "I appreciate our lusophonic steward." —translated by Alex Pereira falaê .
  17.   Support--Jusjih 19:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romihaitza

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Romihaitza

Comments about Romihaitza

  1. Unfortunately Romihaitza has been inactive as a steward for quite a while. Although I value Romi as a collegue, I think this is too inactive (last time really a big batch was in januari 2007, see userrights log). Effeietsanders 23:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Inactive Jaranda | wat's sup 00:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Very low activity. Not sure if Mihai is still able to help out as a steward. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support--Jusjih 19:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Shanel

Comments about Shanel

  2. mean and awful, and even worse, she likes pony Schiste 09:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No problem for me Grimlock 09:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Parfois insupportable sur IRC :) mais elle as des genoux tout doux ! DarkoNeko 10:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Sometimes unbearable on IRC :), but her knees are so soft!" —translated by Pathoschild.
    Vertaling: "Soms ondraaglijk op IRC :), maar haar knieën zijn zo zacht!" -- Vertaald door Effeietsanders.
    OK, Pathoschild, enough with the translations! Translating Oui and Si for us really took the cake! Besides, on this one, I suspect you're actually relating personal experience here more than translating, as I've seen how she bosses you around on IRC... and I have my suspicions about the other part as well. ++Lar: t/c 17:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The translations into English are intended to be vehicular— allowing stewards and others to easily read all comments in the end. While "oui" and "si" may be obvious to you, I'm betting "iva" and "tak" and "はい" are less so (and others might think "はい" is more obvious that "oui"). Regarding this particular translation, well, her knees are soft. Darkoneko, as a cat, is well aware of that fact. ;) —{admin} Pathoschild 03:53:29, 02 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. To Schiste: but pony rulez! Highly active and good steward. As for IRC, girls must have a fun, that's all. --Aphaia 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. I was going to ask if Shanel liked unicorns, too, but I'm afraid someone might think it innuendo when (for once), I say something completely unsullied. Arria Belli | parlami 20:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mango! Mango! Mango! Cary Bass demandez 23:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support!--Nick1915 - all you want 00:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Shanel's confirmation can only serve to help the WMF Gaillimh 00:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. I have concerns that she only brought 2 people to the wikimedia cause on Facebook - but otherwise, this is a green light -- Tawker 00:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gone to find more ponies --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Please someone buy this really nice and helpful and quite adorable *wink* *wink* Steward a pony please :P ..--Cometstyles 10:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Absolutely! Thanks Shanel, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. More huggles for me! Nishkid64 (talk) 18:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Wouldn't be right without Shanel, Majorly (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. oui Anthere 23:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "yes" —translated by Pathoschild.
  17. Full confidence and support for Shanel. Fully support him re-confirming. Anthøny 19:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    or her, whichever. ;) ++Lar: t/c 17:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Full confidence and support also, but I only support her reconfirming ;). John Reaves (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Absolutely, xaosflux Talk 05:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. support for her confirmation. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Oh, I suppose. Not that she does much, but somebody needs to boss Pathoschild around. ++Lar: t/c 17:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Of course. Acalamari 18:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support Miranda 02:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support: I know she's there, from time to time, when a steward is needed for peculiar tasks... Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. honoured to   Support--clamengh 13:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support --Leoman3000 14:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support Every time I sign up on a new countervandalism channel, she's already there! --Gribeco 00:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Support--Jusjih 20:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support Bapti 12:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shizhao

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Shizhao

Comments about Shizhao

  2. Hard working Wikimedian. Must be reconfirmed even if we don't care language diversity. --Aphaia 22:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Occasionally acts without first getting consensus in non emergency situations but is a very hard working and valuable contributor, support reconfirmation. ++Lar: t/c 03:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. He has been very consistent and I'll be proud to see him back :) ..--Cometstyles 10:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Please stay! 请留步！--Edmund the King of the Woods! 14:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Our trustworthy Chinese steward. :) Nishkid64 (talk) 18:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Capable and outstanding. Cary Bass demandez 20:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes Anthere 23:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. yes--Nick1915 - all you want 23:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support continued term.--Jusjih 03:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 我怎能不支持他连任？！ TML 05:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "How can I not support him continuing as-is?!" —translated by Pathoschild.
  12. +Hillgentleman 05:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. support Aucun problème pour moi.--Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 19:57, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support: His long-lasting hardwork not only shaped today's Chinese Wikipedia, but the managerial role he is serving with endurance is what keeping it from degenerating into vandalized shambles or being torn apart by fierce political POV editors.--Computor 21:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 他實在是太重要了！哦， 是吗？(User:O) 23:15, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
    Translation: "His presence is very much important."
  17. honoured to   Support--clamengh 13:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sj

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Sj

Comments about Sj

  2. Appears to be largely inactive (last Steward action in April) --Herby talk thyme 12:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. While this appears to be true, Sj has been involved in many aspects of the foundation's work for a long time and his counsel and advice would be valuable. He has also indicated an intent to increase activity levels so I support retention of stewardship. ++Lar: t/c 12:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. As Lar mentons, Sj has been an enormously dedicated and longstanding volunteer for the WMF. While I agree with Herby that Sj probably won't be the most active steward, the few actions he does perform will only help the WMF and its projects. No such thing as too many clerks in the checkout counter ;) Gaillimh 00:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Samuel is a great Wikimedian who has been showing an extraordinary dedication to Wikimedia projects. He's a very cool guy and I definitely trust him. Though, I am deeply convinced that someone who doesn't use his tools [3] should give them back by honesty. guillom 10:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. He seemed to be an excellent Steward when he was active but seeing that he last Steward action was over 7 months ago, I believe it might be time for a change...--Cometstyles 10:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. If he really really starts getting hard at work again :) Cary Bass demandez 20:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I'm sorry, no use of the steward tools for a very long time (last time really active was june 2006), so I agree with guillom. Effeietsanders 23:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sj., while he has been very helpful in the "behind-the-scenes" area of the Steward system, has been inactive, and that's not the sort of characteristic we need in our Stewards. Suggest no re-confirmation, unless Sj is willing to participate in at least some Steward inactivity. Anthøny 19:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Neutral, gravely inactive, but still helpful. xaosflux Talk 05:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Last action was in 2006. Not sure it's healthy for these positions to be a gold watch. --JayHenry 02:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The log may be acting up on us (presumably unrelatedly, the CU log also sometimes acts up), as different people are reporting different last activity times. I thought Pathy was not showing up recently in the log too, and when I checked again, he had multiple activities a week earlier. So it might be a good thing to double check the log (Herby said April of this year when he checked). I do in the general case agree with JayHenry even if I've argued for an exemption for Sj... ++Lar: t/c 06:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm possibly reading the logs wrong or unaware of activity that would be logged elsewhere. Looks as if he fiddled with his own permissions in April of this year, but hasn't actually changed someone else's permissions since June of 2006.[4]. --JayHenry 16:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I went and looked again and I'm not seeing the inconsistent results I was before, so I think you're right. So then, it's down to the stewards to decide if his statement that he intends to become more active, and the other factors relating to his project experience that some mention outweigh his inactivity... because it's a tossup. I guess in the end my support, such as it is, is rather weaker than it was for Angela or Anthere. (both who do have activity to boot). ++Lar: t/c 18:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Not very active, but I do not oppose remaining a steward.--Jusjih 01:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snowdog

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Snowdog

Comments about Snowdog

  1. Snowdog already mentions himself that he does not foresee any increase in activity. Therefore, I think it would be wise not to continue his stewardship. I would like to state however, that I have absolutely no negative experience with snowdog. Inactivity would be the sole reason. Effeietsanders 22:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Effeits. speaks wise, here. If Snowdog was willing to become active again, then I'd happily suggest his re-confirmation, but since he has indicated to the contrary, do not re-confirm. Anthøny 19:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Unconfirm, per statement above. xaosflux Talk 05:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I agree with Effeiets's words completely --Herby talk thyme 16:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. regrettable, as Snowdog has served the community well, in my view, but I agree as well. Effeiet does indeed speak wisely. ++Lar: t/c 06:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Remove functions. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Unconfirm: a) for the unbecoming behaviour in response to criticism in the past steward confirmation elections, which is worthwhile a decade of opposition; b) also, for reasons which user:Olve well depicts in the page about the proposal of closing Lombard wikipedia: Your profile shows you listed as Italian, as an administrator on it.wikipedia, it.wikiquote, it.wiktionary and it.wikibooks, as well as the vice-president of Wikimedia Italia so you might want to consider that your threats of blocking people here will look like threats to strangle dissent in this particular setting. That being said, racism is neither a precise, nor useful, term here; and the same goes for fascism . Nationalism (or maybe rather chauvinism) getting a bit out of hand seems like a reasonably fitting label, though, and the current campaign looks very suspicious to a great deal of people elsewhere in the Wiki community. I doubt that anyone would be opposed to making the Lombard project better, and that is the natural course of action here. I am not saying that that will be an easy task. But it is an appropriate one. Closing down this project for the highly debatable (and in some cases plain misguided) reasons listed would be a scandal for the whole Wiki community — and it would put the Italian one in a particularly grim light. -- Olve 11:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC) Regards,--clamengh 12:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Unconfirm -- The hawkish beahviour of this user is not worth of a user, let alone a steward. Recent threats of blocking people expressing their dissent about the proposal of closing a project should also be carefully ponderated: summing up, it looks like the case of applying wikimedia clause: if you think that steward are supercops, forget about that. I hope we shall be able to forget soon some contributions by this user--Belinzona 09:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    If insulting other people is an expression of dissent, and asking people to stop it is threatening, then I'm guilty as charged. And since (as you can read in my statement above) I've basically resigned from my role as steward, your comment and those of your 2 friends are once again proof of which kind of people you are. --Snowdog 23:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Unconfirm,   Oppose to confirmation --10caart 20:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Remove.--Jusjih 01:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suisui

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Suisui

Comments about Suisui

  2. Appears to be inactive (last Steward action in February) --Herby talk thyme 12:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Inactive Jaranda | wat's sup 03:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sorry, but we don't really need Inactive stewards...--Cometstyles 10:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Some serious inactivity here, do not reconfirm. Anthøny 19:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Inactive, remove. xaosflux Talk 05:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Displace. ----Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. He greatly contributed to launching Japanese Wikipedia. Best wishes in his new start. --ZCU 12:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Remove. --Marine-Blue [ talk contribs ] 05:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Remove.--Jusjih 01:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. (brief comment in English) sorry and thank you for your contributions for more than 4 years. I hope you will come back to the ja.wiki community some day. Further comments or summury will be made at JA:Wikipedia:コメント依頼/Suisui20070111#まとめにかえて or JA:Wikipedia‐ノート:コメント依頼/Suisui20070111 in Japanese in the future. --Anonymous000 00:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walter

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Walter

Comments about Walter

  1. In this statement I wish to state that Walter is an active and well regarded steward who does not like to give statements. That concludes this pro forma support statement. ++Lar: t/c 12:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nothing. --Aphaia 20:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. In this endorsment I wish to endorse that I do not like to give endorsements when I see no need for doing so. This concludes this pro forma endorsement. Support, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 12:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Walter is a longstanding and active steward, and there is no reason to change that now. Cary Bass demandez 20:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Anthere 23:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support. --Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support--clamengh 13:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support--Jusjih 02:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support ~Rex••talk•• 14:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support -- Schnee 14:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yann

Stewards/confirm/2009/mul/Yann

Comments about Yann

  2. I will never again have confidence in Yann, after his attitude for several articles which have led users to ask for ArbCom advices for sysop tools misusing and community's admissibility criteria refusing (one is currently undergoing. For french language readers : [5], one was closed : [6]). Grimlock 09:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I strongly support this defiance motion (french: motion de défiance) by Grimlock. I have absolutely no trust in this guy: he refuses community opinion if it goes against his political opinions and behaves not more than a vandal in several occasion, harassing several persons. Moez talk 15:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I am also strongly against the reelection of Yann. He was asked twice by the Arbcom not to misuse his sysop tools. And apparently, he does not care, since the ArbCom decision goes against his beliefs and opinions which is against everything Wikipedia is about. Meodudlye 17:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I agree with all the previous comments about Yann's behaviour on the French-language Wikipedia; Yann has abused his sysop position on this project and he keeps a POV-pushing, conflicting attitude towards the community and the ArbCom. I definitely don't trust him as an editor and sysop on fr:wp. Though, the steward confirmation process is independent from his contributions on this project, and I have nothing to reproach him for as a steward. I therefore see no reason why he shouldn't be reconfirmed. guillom 10:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Well I don't know about his french wiki conflicts but as a Steward, he has been excellent helping out whenever he can and wherever possible and I trust this guy to continue doing so. He has been one of the most out-standing stewards and I hope he continues to do so and I hope he gets re-confirmed because he has been doing an excellent job as a Steward and it might be a good idea if he stayed out of the french wiki since its his homewiki and if he hasn't abused his Steward powers on the french wiki then I believe he should still keep it ...--Cometstyles 10:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. It sadens me to hear that there are problems on fr.wiki, but I must agree with Cometstyles here. Yann has always been helpful as a steward and since he should stay out of fr.wiki as steward because it is his homewiki, he has my support if he takes that into account. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I don't know anything about his conflicts on fr:, but I know that Yann had never gave anyone a slightest reason to question his judgement as a steward. Therefore, he must retain his status no matter of local disputes. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 16:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. He might have some issues at fr.wiki, but nonetheless, he has been a valued asset as a steward. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Considering the repeated problems he causes on the French wikipedia (see above), I oppose to his confirmation as a steward. I don't think that we can keep in this position someone whose adminship is on the verge. Poppy 19:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I have seen the issues on fr.wiki, and while I agree that they're regrettable, I disagree that this should be used to question Yann's performance as a steward. He has never led anyone to believe he's acted with a conflict of interest with regard to his personal POV and his duties as a steward. Reconfirm. Cary Bass demandez 20:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. I cannot speak to the issues on frwiki, but I see no problems with his Steward activities, and I support him re-confirming. Anthøny 19:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Idem. I agree with Anthøny. --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support: I'm very often against Yann's opinions (or actions), but what I know about the most of his stuff as a steward helps me to think he should stil bring help in this job. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 22:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC) – I confirm my support, despite the loss of sysop status on wp-FR: this problem has not to interfere with the steward confirmation process, because Yann's behaviour, as a steward acting on multiple projects when it's needed, and acting well, is really correct. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 11:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC) + 12:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. honoured to   Support--clamengh 13:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Concordo Alex Pereira falaê 19:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. A general   Support for the confirmation of these steward. Thank you for your hard work--Belinzona 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yann's loss of sysop status on fr: is deserved, but I don't see any problem with his steward status. Reconfirm. Kropotkine 113 12:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. honoured to   Support too. --Perky 12:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. While I've acted upon ArbCom ruling, and of course I won't comment about that, I express my esteem and support Yann's steward status confirmation. --M/ 14:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. good guy, with some problems on fr: but he is not alone in this case ;D Alvaro 00:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Oppose to confirmation : since he acts like a vandal on fr I can't trust him Markadet 06:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support I've had doubts since the recent abuses on frwiki, which were sanctioned by desysoping, but everyone with actual experience of Yann's acts as steward has been positive, so I see no reason to withhold support here. --Gribeco 00:33, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support. Rester, SVP. (fr) Please stay. (en)--Jusjih 02:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support Yann has abused his sysop position on the French-language Wikipedia and he lost this status there. But Yann has done correct work with his steward status. Even if I ask for desysoping him on fr, as ArbCom member, I support Yann as steward. Reconfirm. Bapti 12:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support —DerHexer (Talk) 14:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/confirm/2009/mul&oldid=801947"