Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 56

This is an archive of past requests. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new request or revive an old one, please do so on the Resource Request page.

Additional GeoScienceWorld

Greetings, has someone access to this publication? For Laguna Socompa

Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, L235. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

Byzantine articles

{{resolved}}

• Oikonomidès, Nicolas (1992). "La decomposition de l'empire byzantin a la veille de 1204 et les origines de l'empire de Nicee: a propos de la «Partitio Romaniae»". Byzantium from the Ninth Century to the Fourth Crusade: Studies, Texts, Monuments (in French). Aldershot. pp. 3–28. ISBN 0860783219.
• Oikonomidès, Nicolas (1992). "L'évolution de l'orginisation administrative de l'empire byzantin au XIe siècle (1025-1118)". Byzantium from the Ninth Century to the Fourth Crusade: Studies, Texts, Monuments (in French). Aldershot. pp. 125–152. ISBN 0860783219.
• Zakythinos, Dionysios (1955). "Μελέται περὶ τῆς διοικητικῆς διαιρέσεως καὶ τῆς ἐπαρχιακῆς διοικήσεως ἐν τῷ Βυζαντινῷ κράτει" [Studies on the administrative division and provincial administration in the Byzantine state]. Epeteris Etaireias Byzantinon Spoudon (in Greek). 25: 127–157.
• Zakythinos, Dionysios (1952). "Μελέται περὶ τῆς διοικητικῆς διαιρέσεως καὶ τῆς ἐπαρχιακῆς διοικήσεως ἐν τῷ Βυζαντινῷ κράτει" [Studies on the administrative division and provincial administration in the Byzantine state]. Epeteris Etaireias Byzantinon Spoudon (in Greek). 22: 159–182.

For Partitio Romaniae and related articles on Byzantine administration.

Thanks in advance, Constantine ✍ 14:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Constantine: Correct me if I'm wrong, but #3 appears to be available here. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:53, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruce1ee, unfortunately that's the 1941 article. Zakythinos wrote a series of articles with the same name, 1955 is the latest, and the only one I cannot find. --Constantine ✍ 17:55, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Constantine: sent 1 and 2. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Received, thanks a lot Worldbruce! Constantine ✍ 07:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent #3 to Cplakidas, — Pajz (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Received, thanks a lot Pajz. Unfortunately I just today noticed that there was also a 1952 publication that forms part of Zakythinos' series of articles (reference added above). If you are able to procure that as well, I'd be very grateful! Apologies for the inconvenience... Constantine ✍ 19:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent #4 to Cplakidas, — Pajz (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Received, thanks a lot, once more, your help has been invaluable. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 21:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Springer

Greetings, has someone access to this publication? For 1257 Samalas eruption. Thanks in advance. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saw it in the library, ultimately was not really useful. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:54, 7 November 2018 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

November 2018

Springer

Greetings, has someone access to this publication? For Toussidé

Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus:   Sent —Bruce1ee^talk 21:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, received. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

JSTOR

Greetings, has someone access to this publication for Toussidé? Thanks in advance. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus:   Sent —Bruce1ee^talk 21:29, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, received. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

Trying to find original German version of Bertold Spuler essay on the Ottoman Empire as part of Persian Historiography

{{resolved}}

• Spuler, Bertold. "DIE HISTORISCHE UND GEOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR IN PERSISCHER SPRACHE". Iranian Studies. ISBN 9789004304994. {{cite journal}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help) - Online Publication Date: 8 December 2016 - Series: Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1 The Near and Middle East, Volume: 4/1Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1 The Near and Middle East, Iranian Studies

For Languages of the Ottoman Empire

I'm trying to find the original German text of a source that was a translation from German to English and I want to see if this is it.

The translation I'm trying to match is this:

• Spuler, Bertold [de], translated from German into English by Muhammad Ismail Marcinkowski. "Persian Historiography Outside Iran in Modern Times: Pre-Ottoman Turkey and Ottoman Empire" (Chapter 13.5). In: Persian historiography and geography. Pustaka Nasional Pte Ltd, 2003. ISBN 9971774887, 9789971774882. Start: 68. CITED: page 69.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Most of it is available in this Google Book preview. I don't know if that will tide you over until someone can send you the full chapter. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruce1ee: Thanks for finding that! It seems like it contains the content that was cited, but I would still like the full chapter so I know what page number it occurs on for that ISBN WhisperToMe (talk) 11:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WhisperToMe, why do you need the entire article if you are only interested in one tiny section? The title of section 13 ("Persian Historiography Outside Iran in Modern Times") is a translation of "Iranische Geschichtsschreibung ausserhalb Persiens in der Neuzeit", pp. 154 et seq. in https://books.google.de/books?id=VPBlAncugn8C. Shouldn't that suffice? — Pajz (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pajz: The reason why I was trying to check this one is that the ISBN is different and I'm trying to see if the content uses the same page number or a different page number. The Google Book which I have access to used the ISBN 9004008578, 9789004008571, while this version uses the ISBN 9789004304994. However I just checked the Gbooks version and it looks like the pages might be the same. Compare 100 and 101 of 9789004008571 with 100 and 101 of the preview of 9789004304994. Assuming the pages are the same I don't need the document. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WhisperToMe, I'm not really following but the volume is from 1968 ... It doesn't have an ISBN. In practice, however, all sorts of content providers make up new identifiers -- even though the only thing they do is digitise the work in some way. There is no point in providing such ISBNs in a Wikipedia article. I would check if the front matter of the book is also available via Google Books and then check the relevant section. If you can't view them, let us know, then I can send you a scan of the front matter and the relevant section from the physical volume. — Pajz (talk) 06:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pajz: The book preview does include the table of contents. According to the TOC Spuler's work begins on p. 100, with the section on Turkey beginning on p. 163. The next section of Spuler's work begins on p. 165. My guess is that the digitizers added ISBNs after the fact. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WhisperToMe, I'm sorry I really don't understand what, if anything, you are requesting. First you said you need the whole article, then I suggested that a particular section might be sufficient, to which you responded by saying you may not need anything at all -- and now your last comment doesn't add anything, so I'm really at a loss. Best, — Pajz (talk) 19:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the confusion. I was wanting to check whether the exact content occurs on the same page number, or on different page numbers, in two different versions of the same document. There are books out there which are published in multiple editions or multiple formats (softcover, hardcover, eBook), and despite these versions being identical in every other way, the same content occurs on different page numbers. When dealing with large works being cited, it is desirable to have the exact page numbers. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pajz: Would it be okay if you sent only pages 163-165 from the version here? If you wanted a particular request then perhaps this would be an idea. This should correspond to the exact content I wanted to review, and sometimes Google Books previews get removed, so it may be good for me to have an extra copy of the pages in question. Would this resolve the issue? WhisperToMe (talk) 04:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what Brill has digitised, and I don't think it matters. As I said, a book from 1968 is a book from 1968, and I believe it should be cited to as such. So I set you a scan of the relevant pages from the 1968 volume; your call whether that is what you're looking for :). — Pajz (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pajz: Thank you! Checked the pages and I confirmed that they're what I need! Based on what I've seen, the digitized version on Brill has the same pages so it's all the same. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An Anthology of Indian Literatures

{{resolved}}

• Kasturiranga Santhanam (1969). An Anthology of Indian Literatures. Gandhi Peace Foundation; Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay. pp. 191–237 (Chapter 4). OCLC 330187.

For Gujarati literature.

Thanks, Gazal world (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sent to Gazal world, — Pajz (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Received. Thanks you Pajz. And Happy Hindu New Year. -Gazal world (talk) 04:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]