Wikipedia

Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nicmart (talk | contribs) at 01:47, 8 September 2019 (→Criticism: minor rewrite). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Life Extension: A Practical Scientific Approach is a 1982 book (ISBN 0-446-51229-X) by Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw that popularized the life extension and smart drug movements.[1][2]

The book discussed free radicals and the idea that they cause aging, and how antioxidants were said to partially prevent the damage they do.[3] The book suggests causes of aging and ways to slow them, with material on improving health and various aspects of the quality of life.

One notable feature of the book was several full-page pictures of its male and female authors, Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw, striking bodybuilding poses and showing off some impressive muscles for "sedentary research scientists," which they claimed was due to the "growth hormone releasers" they took daily.

Criticism

Prominent aging researchers expressed mostly negative opinions of the book.

Leonard Hayflick deemed it "a glib, superficial overview of the field.,“ adding that he "would be very unhappy to learn that there were substantial numbers of people depending on its contents for guidance.” Denham Harman, to whom the book was dedicated and whose free radical theory of aging was favored by Pearson and Shaw, opined, "I think basically the book is sound."[4]

Biogerontologist Roy Walford wrote, "gerontology has always been the happy hunting ground for faddists, charlatans, pseudoscientific fringe characters, and just misinformed enthusiasts with 'ready cures' for aging. ... Pearson and Shaw are among this long list of enthusiasts. ... Most of the Pearson/Shaw book relies on this lower-order category of evidence, and upon the testimonial posturing of Pearson and Shaw themselves."[5] In a discussion group posting, biogerontologist Dr. Steve Harris, MD criticizes the book, offering an example of one the authors' "screwups:"

I managed to track one of their references to the (supposedly) somniferous effects of inositol back through some of the primary literature they'd cited (loosely) in the back of the chapter. Wups, guess what? They'd been reading a paper on natural ligands of the benzodiazepine receptor, and confused inositol with inosine (helped out by [Carl] Pffeifer's [sic] claims that inositol is sleep inducing). Inosine actually HAS some demonstrated Valium like effects in some animals (birds), but to this day you're going to see inositol in sleep remedies.[6]

References

  1. ^ See Rapture: How Biotech Became the New Religion, by Brian S. Alexander, New York: Basic Books, 2003, ISBN 0-7382-0761-6, pp. 5–6.
  2. ^ Bishop, Katherine (1992-06-11). "FDA fears smart drugs could pose stupid risks". Seattle Post-Intelligencer newspaper. Retrieved 2007-03-01.
  3. ^ Fiely, Dennis (1993-09-16). "'Biochemical bad boys' - Possible causes of disease, free radicals, may have met their match". Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved 2007-03-01.
  4. ^ Karen G. Jackovich (October 4, 1982). "Two Fitness Faddists Have a No. 1 Best-Seller, but Are They Stretching Life Spans or Truth?". people.com. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  5. ^ Walford, Roy (2000). Beyond the 120 Year Diet: How to Double Your Vital Years. New York, NY: Four Walls Eight Windows. pp. 21–23. ISBN 9781568581576.
  6. ^ Harris, Steve. "Re: Whats up with Pearson & Shaw". Retrieved 2 June 2012.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Life_Extension:_A_Practical_Scientific_Approach&oldid=914543915"