Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacob Peters

< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | Case
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Merzbow (talk | contribs) at 23:32, 31 December 2006 (→Jacob Peters). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jacob Peters

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 02:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Code letter: F ([1])

Looks like another JP sock. Perhaps not as obvious as previous socks because this account has no Talk page posts, but everything else is in character - pro-Stalinist edits, same sort of broken-English incivility (this time in the edit summaries), false information in edit summaries (marking edits as 'grammatical corrections' when they aren't) etc. - Merzbow 23:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jacob Peters}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  • Code letter: F ([2])

69.110.222.228's contributions are to Soviet-related topics, which are what Jacob Peters usually edits, and take a clear pro-Soviet anti-Western POV lining up with Jacob Peters's: [3], [4], [5], [6]. Perhaps most obvious is the use of the not-too-common term "agitprop" [7], which Jacob Peters also uses [8]. The tone of the IP, dismissing his opponents as illogical and spreading propoganda, is also very like Jacob Peters's. Jacob Peters has already been blocked several times for edit warring and other disruption and for sockpuppetry [9]. Heimstern Läufer 02:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Confirmed. Dmcdevit·t 02:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Peters

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

I find this comment by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) oddly similar to this comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), given they are writing about the same sentence and deriding Alan Bullock. Note that the IP was blocked as a sockpuppet of Jacob Peters (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (at least according to 68.127.37.13's block log). Here's another comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) that appears to take a position similar to that taken by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs) here. This edit by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) is also a carbon-copy of this edit by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs). I, thus, feel convinced that Jacob Peters (talk · contribs) is once again evading a block through sockpuppetry. -- tariqabjotu 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Likely. Dmcdevit·t 08:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Jacob Peters

  • Code letter: F

Otto Schmidt's controversial edit [10] at Robert Conquest is almost identical of several Jacob Peters edits[11][12][13] at same page. Jacob Peters is currently blocked for avoiding blocks and sockpuppeting[14][15]. So I suspect sockpuppetry to avoid block again. Staberinde 20:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 03:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Jacob_Peters&oldid=97627128"