Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 9

9 January 2007

Bill_Britt

Bill_Britt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD)

Bill Britt is a notable person. Bill Britt is one of the top most distributors in Amway/Quixtar. Britt has above 1 million people in his downline.He is currently serving as a Presidents Cabinet Representative on the IBOA International Board. http://www.iboai.com/IBOAI-PresidentsCabinet-BillBritt.asp

Britt is mentioned in the Forbes Magazine, December 9, 1991 http://www.amquix.info/forbes_december_9_1991.html

Britt was mentioned in nationally televised news documentary on the Dateline NBC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amway#_note-20

The Triangle Business Journal reports a scam involving him. http://triangle.bizjournals.com/triangle/stories/2003/08/11/story1.html

The Burlington Times-News reported about Britt's involvement in fradulent investment schemes, and about his impending separation with his wife. http://www.amquix.info/forbes_december_9_1991.html

A lawsuit involving him is mentioned in an article in "Time Out". http://www.rickross.com/reference/amway/amway9.html

A lawsuit involving him is mentioned in an article in "The Legal Intelligencer". http://www.amquix.info/aus/hanrahan.htm#articles Knverma 12:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generation YES

Generation YES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD)

• UNDELETE. The company is well-known among the educational technology field, According to WP:CORP, the company has to have been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works from independent sources. These sources are referenced and the article was not copyrighted, as suggested by the person who did the delete. They were reading a past delete that was more than 1 year old and completely unrelated to this article. This company is significant throughout technology education, and further content can be added to prove as much. Freechild 04:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• COMMENT. I deleted this because the article did not appear to establish notability and was close to advertising with phrases like all Generation YES programs improve the use of technology in the school as a whole. A claim of 100% success needs to be verified. If notability is accepted either here or at AfD, the article needs a bit of NPOV work. I noted that a previous editor had deleted on copyright issues, but I did not take that into account since I was not deleting on that basis, I just mentioned it to User:Freechild Jimfbleak.talk.07:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore for review, I can't find a google cache, and recent deletions have made me inherently suspicious of all G11s. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 05:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• List for AfD. It does have references although the references section is missing, making it not show up in the article. ColourBurst 06:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Send to AFD for more discussion. It does assert the importance of its subject. >Radiant< 10:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Overturn, AfD if necessary. Obviously not an A7. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Jencka

Daniel Jencka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD)

The composer is well known among students and associates of American composer Stanley Hollingsworth, and was regionally very well known in Detroit, Michigan and Windsor, Canada in the late 70's and throughout the 80's as a member of the Flauto e Basso Baroque Duo. Significant within the world of modern harpsichord music. Morphixnm 03:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Endorse deletion. Do you have any sources for all this? -Amarkov ^blah_edits 05:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pentagon_precollapse.jpg

File:Pentagon precollapse.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (restore|AfD)

The picture had a source, and fair use rationale - yet was still speedily deleted without giving me notice. Fresheneesz 03:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• A fair use image that is not used in an article is eligible for speedy deletion. --Peta 03:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was on the page The Pentagon before it was admittedly erroneously removed.

Also, this page (http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a1015pentagoncollapse) suggests that Jason Ingersoll released his pictures from that day to the public ___domain. This page (911review.com) says the image I uploaded came from Jason Ingersoll at 10:05am. Fresheneesz 03:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No, that first link shows that those particular pictures in that link are public ___domain, not that all pictures by that photographer are public ___domain. We need proof of something being PD, not conjecture. So keep deleted. >Radiant< 10:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blanik 3 a.jpg

Image:Blanik 3 a.jpg – Restored by deleting admin – 03:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
File:Blanik 3 a.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (restore|IfD) Did a search of the last two weeks of IFD, no listing, no notice on talk, nor on image as far as the last week or two. The image just up and disappeared The image was tagged and sourced. PPGMD 02:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Noncommercial image incorrectly tagged as {{CopyrightedFreeUse}}) per the logs. ~ trialsanderrors 03:00, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Incorrect assumption, the image was uploaded 2-3 years ago as noncommerical when that was acceptable, and was changed recently to Copyright Free use in order for the page to be promoted to FA status. PPGMD 03:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] It's restored, I think we're done here. ~ trialsanderrors 03:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Sadly, No

Sadly, No – Speedy close, totally groundless nomination. – 13:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Sadly, No (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD) Deleted via avowed trolling by Gay Niggers of America 71.250.215.101 00:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Endorse Deletion, valid AFD. Naconkantari 01:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Also can the nominator provide any evidence that the GNAA has anything to do with this? --70.48.108.229 01:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Endorse my deletion, AFD was valid - despite problems with its nominator, other editors in good standing agreed the article should have been deleted, and there was a consensus to delete. The article was not salted, so the article can be recreated if the new article can show that the subject meets WP:WEB. Possibly speedy close this, no new info was provided by the nominator. --Coredesat 03:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Delist, no plausible reason for undeletion given, just an unsubstantiated allegation. >Radiant< 10:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Meadowridge_School

Meadowridge_School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|AfD)

I_Authorize_reproduction_of_Meadowridge_website_content_I_am_web_administrator_www.meadowridge.bc.ca Wakeling2 00:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A wikipedia only release is not free enough for the content to be used. it would need to be released under the GFDL by the holder of the copyright.Geni 01:31, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, you have to say that on the site itself; anyone can lie and claim they're you. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 02:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]