User contributions for MathLine

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

04:45, 19 July 2016 SQL talk contribs changed block settings for MathLine talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia)

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

00:3600:36, 23 June 2016 diff hist +423 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astrology →Academic mathematics vs. astrology in Universal trinity: new section

20:1020:10, 22 June 2016 diff hist +416 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics →Universal trinity

01:3101:31, 12 June 2015 diff hist +1,412 Talk:Progressive lens →Associated solids like a "Half circle of revolution": new section

22:3622:36, 11 May 2015 diff hist +73 Trigonometric functions →Series definitions: pi/sin(pi*x) = 1/x + sum(n,1,infinity,(-1)^n*2*x/(x^2-n^2))

17:4717:47, 30 September 2014 diff hist −367 Gamma function →Fourier series expansion: But then you have to remove it all due to its wrong results, exp(GammaLn(4)) = 6 and nothing else.
17:1817:18, 30 September 2014 diff hist +96 Gamma function →Fourier series expansion

11:5611:56, 8 January 2014 diff hist +1,457 User talk:MathLine →January 2014

08:4808:48, 7 January 2014 diff hist +8,005 Periodic continued fraction Pseudocode is not "tied" to use software, it is now clarified as "programming language", source for the countability added to introduce the Wikipedia:What SYNTH is not#SYNTH is not explanation better. Please talk to me before such removals. Thanks

08:3808:38, 6 January 2014 diff hist −6 m Periodic continued fraction →Bijection with natural numbers
08:2908:29, 6 January 2014 diff hist +8,112 Periodic continued fraction It is indeed directly associated with periodic cont. fractions. If the requirements for a "stand-alone page" as in WP:GNG are so high, then please.

10:5210:52, 5 January 2014 diff hist +319 Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not →Vandalism against WP:NOTHOWTO by {{user|JohnCD}}: new section
09:5609:56, 5 January 2014 diff hist +128 Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not →{{anchor|GUIDE|HOWTO|INTERNET|JARGON|NOTCASE|NOTHOWTO|NOT#JARGON|notjarg|NOTMANUAL}} Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal: This important hint seems to be now decisive in the article Auxiliary fraction.
01:0701:07, 5 January 2014 diff hist +882 User talk:David Eppstein →Acceptability of List of quadratic irrational numbers set in a systematic order

22:5622:56, 3 January 2014 diff hist +1,500 User talk:David Eppstein →Acceptability of List of quadratic irrational numbers set in a systematic order: new section

23:1323:13, 2 January 2014 diff hist +543 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Please restore my deleted article in my user namespace: new section

21:1121:11, 28 December 2013 diff hist +153 User talk:Spartaz →Your suppression of List of quadratic irrational numbers set in a systematic order (in the Deletion review)
04:5404:54, 28 December 2013 diff hist +779 User talk:Spartaz →Your suppression of List of quadratic irrational numbers set in a systematic order (in the Deletion review): new section
00:2300:23, 28 December 2013 diff hist +657 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 This discussion can of course not be finished as long as no expert (here: mathematical) gives an estimation which includes arguing to WP:CALC and the further explicitly mentioned sources from linked articles.

22:1622:16, 21 December 2013 diff hist +5 m Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 No edit summary
22:0922:09, 21 December 2013 diff hist +1,670 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 No edit summary

00:0000:00, 20 December 2013 diff hist +1,343 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 No edit summary

00:4000:40, 19 December 2013 diff hist +2,544 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 No edit summary

01:1101:11, 18 December 2013 diff hist +1,055 Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 December 17 No edit summary

00:3600:36, 17 December 2013 diff hist +1,033 User talk:Postdlf/Archive24 →At least one week deletion discussion, please

18:5418:54, 16 December 2013 diff hist +486 User talk:Postdlf/Archive24 →At least one week deletion discussion, please: new section
18:0218:02, 16 December 2013 diff hist +2,112 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of quadratic irrational numbers set in a systematic order No edit summary

23:4623:46, 7 December 2013 diff hist +621 User talk:Trovatore →Removal of the trajectory section in Exponentiation: new section

00:3800:38, 6 December 2013 diff hist +1,225 Exponentiation Undid revision 560017982 by Dmcq (talk): "No known interest at present" is Never Alone a reason for section removals in math literature. It gives a basic further insight which helps comprehending.

14:0114:01, 22 September 2013 diff hist +938 User talk:David Eppstein →Please explain the regular K5 associahedron's irrelevance: new section

19:4319:43, 15 September 2013 diff hist +1,497 Associahedron No edit summary
03:5803:58, 15 September 2013 diff hist +569 Associahedron Na how cool would be a box with the shape of such a regular enneahedron with a world map in gnomonic projection printed on all nine sides!

01:3801:38, 1 July 2013 diff hist +705 Associahedron Why is also "K4" here something 2- and "K5" something 3-dimensional? The cited MathWorld site tells the node # of the → n–1 ← and not the n+1 - …hedron is C_n.

21:5921:59, 28 June 2013 diff hist +401 Associahedron A hydrogenated fullerene C14 can exist!

22:3522:35, 27 June 2013 diff hist +908 Arithmetic function A characterization of Ω directly next to its definition (but could also clarify the difficulty of Integer factorization). Does the mathematical literature already contain something about the "x^(x+1) = 2" solution? (↗ Talk:Lambert W function)

18:5318:53, 26 June 2013 diff hist +238 User talk:David Eppstein →What is a factorization "algorithm", David Eppstein!: new section
15:1815:18, 26 June 2013 diff hist +919 Integer factorization Isn't that a FASCINATING visualisation of the prime factor amount chaos from me? ☺ Pleeease also look my question about x^(x+1) = 2 in Talk:Lambert W function. Maybe due to its difficulty one further of the Unsolved problems in mathematics?

15:5715:57, 11 June 2013 diff hist +241 Talk:Lambert W function →Example 2: x ^ (x+1) = 2 ?

13:2313:23, 12 May 2013 diff hist +1,225 Exponentiation →Lines of x^y equality in a coordinate system: Two sources added to the term “trajectory”. [Please don't delete whole chapters so fast. It's maths. ☺]
01:4801:48, 12 May 2013 diff hist +948 Exponentiation →Real exponents

User contributions for MathLine

23 June 2016

22 June 2016

12 June 2015

11 May 2015

30 September 2014

8 January 2014

7 January 2014

6 January 2014

5 January 2014

4 January 2014

3 January 2014

2 January 2014

28 December 2013

21 December 2013

20 December 2013

19 December 2013

18 December 2013

17 December 2013

16 December 2013

7 December 2013

6 December 2013

22 September 2013

15 September 2013

1 July 2013

28 June 2013

27 June 2013

26 June 2013

11 June 2013

12 May 2013