User contributions for ExplodingCabbage

A user with 840 edits. Account created on 3 October 2011.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 March 2025

18 February 2025

  • 15:1115:11, 18 February 2025 diff hist −216 Evil eye In Judaism: Dedupe bit about Jews not watching ripening crops - was already in article but User:Davidbena recently added a new (IMO better) version. Also moved his new para up a bit, so that paras that quote or describe what actual religious authorities say are grouped together before paras that are purely about customs and rituals.

31 January 2025

  • 20:3020:30, 31 January 2025 diff hist −755 Red banana Undid revision 1273060917 by Latinomnes (talk) - very sketchy source. At least some stuff on the site is conspicuously AI generated and I strongly suspect literally all of the content is. The particular "article" cited was posted simultaneously with a slew of similar "articles" that just contain purported nutritional data of fruits, written by "Admin", with no explanaton of where any of it came from. Tag: Undo

28 January 2025

19 January 2025

  • 13:1913:19, 19 January 2025 diff hist −117 Symbolic execution Undid revision 1264379372 by Onekx666 (talk). I do not think it is plausible anyone would arrive at this page expecting to read about capital punishment. Pages with titles that are MUCH more plausibly related to capital punishment ("Writ of execution", "Stay of execution") do not have such a disambiguation line. Tag: Undo

27 December 2024

10 December 2024

9 December 2024

7 December 2024

  • 09:5909:59, 7 December 2024 diff hist −240 Inherent vowel "Wikipedia" -> "Wkpeda" example is confusing/wrong here; if we were indeed following the rule for writing vowels in Meroitic script, "Wkpeda" would mean "Wikipeda", not "Wikipedia", because "da" would correspond to "da" and not "dia". Reverts a 2015 addition by User:Tarchon. Not categorically opposed to trying to put some other, better example here, but personally I think it's almost impossible to give an example based on Latin script here that won't confuse more than it clarifies.

6 December 2024

3 December 2024

  • 11:5411:54, 3 December 2024 diff hist −1,047 Evil eye Delete entire section on Christianity, which appears to just contain editors' own WP:OR interpretations of Bible passages that personally I don't interpret as having any connection to the evil eye (as defined in this article) whatsoever. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Evil_eye#The_evil_eye_in_Christianity. If this stuff is gonna be restored, it should be with secondary sources supporting the idea of a connection.
  • 11:5011:50, 3 December 2024 diff hist +1,955 Talk:Evil eye The evil eye in Christianity: Reply Tag: Reply
  • 11:1311:13, 3 December 2024 diff hist −1,030 Evil eye Remove claims about folk Christianity that is sourced to Dracula. We are literally citing a work of *fiction* here, and inferring with no non-fiction source at all that the superstitions of one (fictional) group of Romanian peasants in the 1890s are broadly representative of "folk Christianity" today in Europe. Clearly an unreasonable inference. If this is a real folk Christian belief (I am skeptical of this), find a non-fiction source that says so.
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)