Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 103

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 23:32, 11 March 2021 (Archiving 3 discussions from Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Description of Xixiposaurus

  • SEKIYA, Toru (2010). "A new prosauropod dinosaur from Lower Jurassic in Lufeng of Yunnan". Global Geology. 29 (1): 6–15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2010.01.002. ISSN 1673-9736.

For Xixiposaurus

Thanks, Atlantis536 (talk) 11:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OUP chapter

For articles in User:Eddie891/GT

Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: In your Gbooks link, I can access all except 234, 235 and 238. By the way, the chapter ends on 239, not 240. If you can't access specific pages, let me know and I can send the ones I do have access to apart from those 3. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MrLinkinPark333, That's curious-- My gbooks preview ends at page 77! Eddie891 Talk Work 16:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Eddie891: Hmm. It could be either daily page limit and/or geographic page limit. Maybe try opening in another browser? --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MrLinkinPark333, Thanks. Through google.com, I get that "pages 77 to end are not included in this preview". if I go through google.ca, I can see the pages I want, I can see the pages where they should be but they have "you have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this book." Thoughts? Eddie891 Talk Work 17:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eddie891 It's most likely a daily page limit. If you check again another day, you might be able to get more pages then you did before (depending on how many pages you looked already). Sometimes I can't access a page then might be able to - depends if it's part of the preview. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920, Project MUSE

{{resolved}}

  • Witchard, Anne (2005). "Thomas Burke, the 'Laureate of Limehouse': a new biographical outline". English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920. 48 (2): 164–187. doi:10.2487/P835-5585-4343-R5Q8.

For Thomas Burke (author)

Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 16:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill: Yes Sent (from Project MUSE). —Bruce1eetalk 16:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruce1ee: Received with thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GeoScienceWorld

Greetings, has someone access to this chapter? For African humid period

Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article from Cambridge Core

{{resolved}}

For Afsharid dynasty

Thanks, - LouisAragon (talk) 21:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LouisAragon: This chapter has been uploaded to ResearchGate here. —Bruce1eetalk 22:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bruce1ee: Many thanks, marked as resolved! - LouisAragon (talk) 22:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Longrich 2010

{{resolved}}

  • Longrich, N. R. (2010). "The Function of Large Eyes in Protoceratops: A Nocturnal Ceratopsian?". In Ryan, M. J.; Chinnery-Allgeier, B. J.; Eberth, D. A. (eds.). New Perspectives on Horned Dinosaurs: The Royal Tyrrell Museum Ceratopsian Symposium. Indiana University Press. pp. 308−327. ISBN 978-0-253-35358-0.

Currently working on Protoceratops. Thanks in advance! PaleoNeolitic (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PaleoNeolitic: Yes Sent (from Project MUSE). —Bruce1eetalk 14:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Received. 👌 PaleoNeolitic (talk) 14:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Description of Arackar

  • Rubilar-Rogers, D.; Vargas, A. O.; González Riga, B.; Soto-Acuña, S.; Alarcón-Muñoz, J.; Iriarte-Díaz, J.; Arévalo, C.; Gutstein, C. S. (2021). "Arackar licanantay gen. et sp. nov. a new lithostrotian (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of the Atacama Region, northern Chile". Cretaceous Research. in press: Article 104802. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104802.

For Arackar

Thanks, Atlantis536 (talk) 13:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantis536: I have access to this article. Please Wikimail me and I'll send it to you. —Bruce1eetalk 14:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantis536: Yes Sent (from ScienceDirect). —Bruce1eetalk 16:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantis536: Did you receive the article I sent you? Can this request be tagged as resolved? —Bruce1eetalk 17:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{Resolved}}

Sources for "Wraith" novel

{{resolved}} Wraith: Sins of the Fathers was redirected after an AFD where only one review was found. This link on the ISFDB shows that there was a review in Vector 189. Apparently the novel is also covered in The Mammoth Book of Best New Horror #7. Does anyone know how to track down that issue of Vector or the Mammoth Book? BOZ (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, BOZ (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thanks! :) That's one down. BOZ (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alexandra, sounds good! If you can send me that part of the Mammoth Book then I will try a draft for this novel. :) BOZ (talk) 19:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you! :) BOZ (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesboro Sun article about Delaplaine, Arkansas schools

{{resolved}}

For Delaplaine School District

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: sent. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR book

For new article

Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: I have access to that. Email me so I can send it to you. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RandomCanadian, sent Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Eddie891: I've sent you the chapter. Confirm you've got it? Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RandomCanadian, Yes, many thanks. {{resolved}}. Apologies, I haven't been around today. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forslund 1988

For A Ruined Life — specifically looking for page 273, as cited here.

Thanks, DanCherek (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Resolved}}

Crime and Spy Jazz on Screen Since 1971: A History and Discography

Hello everyone. I would greatly appreciate Chapter 11 ("Freshly Squeezed: 1990—94", pp. 165–177) from the following book. I will be using it to revise the Veronica Clare article for a FAC.

I originally could access the parts of the book I need through Google Books Preview, but for whatever reason, it is not inaccessible to me. I have been having issues with them for some time, although I am sure there is a clear and obvious answer. Thank you in advance for your help! Aoba47 (talk) 01:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: I've experienced this before myself. I suspect that Google Books may move a book's preview window from time to time. I've learnt that if I can see pages in a preview, save them before the window shifts. Regarding the pages you want (165–177), I can see all of them except pages 167, 175 and 177. I'm not sure how much you can see. —Bruce1eetalk 07:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Bruce1ee: Thank you for the response. The information on the show is on page 168. I have tried looking through Google Books preview again, and it is still not accessible to me for some reason. Would it be possible to email me a screenshot? Aoba47 (talk) 13:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I get around this issue by taking screenshots of pages that I may want later. (t · c) buidhe 08:07, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: I've sent you page 168. —Bruce1eetalk 14:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Science Books: A Quarterly Review

{{resolved}} I am looking for reviews of the 1968 book Draft:Steps in the Scientific Tradition. Google snippet view[2] seems to indicate that it was reviewed in Science Books: A Quarterly Review:

Cheers, gnu57 06:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Genericusername57, I'm seeing if I can find this. In the interim, just wanted to make sure you're also aware of this review in Choice Reviews. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Genericusername57: Requested via ILL. Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Genericusername57: Please send me an email. Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Genericusername57: Yes Sent Compassionate727 (T·C) 04:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Compassionate727: Received, thank you. @Usernameunique: Thank you for pointing out the Choice review; the first time I saw it, I thought it was an abridged version of this review in Isis, but now at second look I'm less certain. Cheers, gnu57 16:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perone, James E. (2017). ISBN 9781440852947

  • Perone, James E. (2017). "Becoming Fearless". The Words and Music of Taylor Swift. ABC-CLIO. pp. 5–26. ISBN 9781440852947.

For Taylor Swift (album). "Chapter 2: Becoming Fearless", which contains a lot of information regarding this album, is needed.

Thank you very much, (talk) 11:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@: I can access p. 5-14 on GBooks. Unfortunately, not the whole chapter. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrLinkinPark333: I could only access up to page 8. I think depending on geographic locations preview limit is different. (talk) 01:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@: Yeah, that's possibly the case :/ --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pages in book for article on painting The Thankful Poor

For The Thankful Poor

Thanks, GeneralPoxter (talk) 05:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for The Thankful Poor in this book shows that there are articles on this painting starting at page 32 and page 90. —Bruce1eetalk 06:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralPoxter, email me for pages 31–35 & 86–93. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralPoxter, sent. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Usernameunique! I got the pages. GeneralPoxter (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

Review

To assess a source which came together with massive changes by one editor for Battle of Borodino per a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Duplicate_articles (I do not have access to this via access from my current institution)

Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's available via Wikipedia Library. I can send it to you by email if it doesn't work for you. Meanderingbartender (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that'd be nice. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Meanderingbartender. —Bruce1eetalk 16:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Sent Meanderingbartender (talk) 16:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

Rosenberg — Prat 1996 and Watteau: The Drawings

{{resolved}}

For Two Studies of an Actor (Watteau).

From Russia with love, Gleb95 (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Gleb95, which part of #2 (Watteau: The Drawings) are you looking for? I believe this is the ToC. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usernameunique, certainly the catalogue part, which has the Berlin drawing as no. 86. If the index has pages that mention the drawing-in-question, I wouldn't be against if you'll send those. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gleb95 (talkcontribs) 20:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gleb95, sent #2 (Watteau: The Drawings). --Usernameunique (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Usernameunique, received. Gleb95 (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
 Doing... #1 (will take a few days as I currently get all my books from the library by mail), — Pajz (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gleb95, sent #1. — Pajz (talk) 13:41, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pajz, received. From Russia with love, Gleb95 (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

One Object, Three Histories: Provenancing the Dromedary

  • Lippincott, Louise (2019). "One Object, Three Histories: Provenancing the Dromedary". In Milosch, Jane C.; Pearce, Nick (eds.). Collecting and Provenance: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 299. ISBN 9781538127582.

For Lion Attacking a Dromedary

Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:49, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerillero: Available at Google Books Canada. If you can't access it due to page restrictions, let me know and I'll forward it over. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrLinkinPark333: Thank you! I can only see the first two pages on amazon -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Guerillero: Can you access page 299? Also, the chapter ends at 306 if you need it. I can access most of it apart from 300 and 301. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MrLinkinPark333: I can access 297-299 and 302-306. Can you get 300-302? -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 01:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Guerillero: 300-301 are not part of the preview. I can only access 302. Also can't access 303 either. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you send 302 to <email removed>, please? -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 02:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Guerillero: Sent. I suggest adjusting the page range in your request to show which pages you need now since you have 299. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Guerillero: email me. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Worldbruce: What you sent me is perfect. Thank you so much --In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 21:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
{{resolved}}

March 2021

De Gruyter chapter

{{resolved}}

For Seyfo

(If no one has access to the digital version, I can get a physical copy via ILL). Thanks, (t · c) buidhe 03:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Why don't you apply for access? They grant it quickly. --Gazal world (talk) 07:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My access to De Gruyter via the Wikipedia Library does not let me see this chapter. Apparently there is a problem with De Gruyter access at the moment. They redesigned their website and haven't sorted/loaded our access yet, or something like that. —Bruce1eetalk 07:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes. I forgot. --Gazal world (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I actually looked at WP:TWL but didn't see it there, maybe because it isn't working at the moment. (t · c) buidhe 14:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Buidhe, someone here might have access, but you might also try emailing De Gruyter and explaining the situation; they have sent me one-off articles in the past. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Canadian Peoples & Northeastern Borderlands: Four Centuries of Interaction

For Roscoe Fillmore. All three of them are on google books but can't get a snip large enough to figure out if it's useful information.

Thank you kindly, Meanderingbartender (talk) 11:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Meanderingbartender: #1 is available at the Internet Archive to borrow here. —Bruce1eetalk 12:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The 2006 edition of #2 is also available at the Internet Archive to borrow here. —Bruce1eetalk 12:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thank you kindly. Meanderingbartender (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Meanderingbartender, sent #3 (The Northeastern Borderlands). --Usernameunique (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Thank you kindly. Meanderingbartender (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thank you kindly. Meanderingbartender (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Resolved}}

Request for Henry Ossawa Tanner by Darrell Sewell

{{resolved}}

After gaining access to the Mosby source, I need to cross-reference some information to find out if two different sources are referring to the same art reviewer. One of them cites Sewell p. 119, but I found that the book also has information on The Thankful Poor. I'm not sure which exact page ranges I will need, but it should include page 119.

For The Thankful Poor

Thanks, GeneralPoxter (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralPoxter: The Internet Archive has this book to borrow. Darrel Sewell is listed as one of the editors. I'm not sure if this is the book you're after. —Bruce1eetalk 22:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce1ee, this does not appear to be the same book, but it looks like another interesting potential source for the article. GeneralPoxter (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralPoxter, according to the ISBN on page 308 of the Archive.org book, it's the same book you requested. --Usernameunique (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I looked through Bruce1ee's book, and found that the exact quote mentioned in the Mosby provided by Usernameunique is also mentioned on page 92 of this book. So yes, this is likely the same book I need. However, I forgot to include a separate source I need for the cross-reference: the notes section of the chapter I specified in the new book by Woods. It should be near the end of the chapter. Specifically, I need to know the note 32 that is the source for the passage at the bottom of page 85. Searching over the Google book version's snippet previews is not enough to confirm what it is. GeneralPoxter (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GeneralPoxter, Please email me and I'll send you the Woods chapter. (t · c) buidhe 23:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Sent (t · c) buidhe 00:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dunce": newspaperarchive.com/Gale . OED.

(I think it's also available via Gale - Early English Newspapers.) {{Resolved}}

  • Oxford English Dictionary online full entry for "Dunce".


For Dunce

Thanks, trespassers william (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danny lost, here's the newspaper article. The reference to "the dunce's cap" is in the third paragraph of the left column, beginning "The Courier, in noticing..." --Usernameunique (talk) 01:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@trespassers william: I have access to this entry from the Second Edition (2009) of the Oxford English Dictionary, ISBN 9780199563838. Please Wikimail me and I'll send it to you. —Bruce1eetalk 08:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce1ee Thank you very much. I saved the article. On OED I looked a few years ago, and just want to see if it was recently updated, so 2009 won't do. I meant to ask for OED online.

A specific 2020 article

I would like a copy of this article, please:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31769884/

I want to see if I can use it to improve any of the abortion-related articles on Wikipedia, such as maybe Don Marquis's article.

Futurist110 (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Futurist110, I have a PDF copy. Please email me and I'll send it to you. (t · c) buidhe 06:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Futurist110, did you get a copy of this from Buidhe? --Usernameunique (talk) 08:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Futurist110, just following up. --Usernameunique (talk) 09:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Futurist110, I'm going to assume you received this from Buidhe, and am thus marking as resolved. --Usernameunique (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{resolved}}

Article in Journal of Intellectual Freedom and Privacy

For NoFap—contested deletion of apparently sourced information.

Thanks, Tgeorgescu (talk) 02:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{resolved}}

SERNAGEOMIN

Probably a hopeless case, but has someone access to this publication? For User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Tocorpuri

Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jo-Jo Eumerus, try contacting the author: his gmail can be found by clicking on his bolded name here. —Usernameunique (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, Jo-Jo Eumerus, a response to your comment regarding contacting authors, which was archived before I had a chance to respond. You said "Sorry, but in light of bad experiences I am extremely reluctant at contacting people off-Wikipediaby email." I'm not sure what bad experiences you are, or could be, referring to; the worst that can happen by emailing an author and requesting an article is that they respond by saying "no." In fact, the very first of the "Tips for finding a source yourself" at the top of this page is to "Send a request to the author(s) of research papers for a copy of their paper by email."
There are many reasons for authors to oblige, such as the desire to see their research widely distributed, professional pride, and common courtesy. It is frequently also the least indulgent request, because other means—asking people to track down and download or scan a work, or requesting an institution obtain it via ILL—tend to take more time and money than reaching out to someone who already has it. Given the nature of your requests, many of which are obscure, held by few institutions, and difficult to obtain—a prime example being this article, which you term "Probably a hopeless case"—it almost behooves you to take the step of reaching out to those most likely to have the articles—that is, the authors themselves. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see. Will probably take some time though, messaging a stranger over stuff on a website is always a bit hard. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, Jo-Jo Eumerus. If the discomfort of sending strangers emails is what's making you hesitant, don't worry—I would just send a brief form email (similar to how you lead off most of your requests here with "Greetings, has someone..."), saying that you came across a reference to their article, think it might be useful for a Wikipedia article you're working on, and wonder if they have a copy readily available. --Usernameunique (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jo-Jo Eumerus, have you tried reaching out to the author? --Usernameunique (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, I forgot. I've made a note about this now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Have you contacted him? Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet, I have been kinda busy the last few weeks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jo-Jo Eumerus, have you reached out? --Usernameunique (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do so soon-ish. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC) {{resolved}}[reply]

Rational Living:"Religious Orientation, Religious Behavior, and .... Irrational Beliefs"

  • Primavera, L. H (1980). "Religious Orientation, Religious Behavior, and Dogmatism as Correlates of Irrational Beliefs". Rational Living: 15:35–37. OCLC 6323843.

For Draft:Irrational beliefs

Thanks, Bookku (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Full citation is available here. Its Vol. 15, Issue 2. Also added OCLC. --Gazal world (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Total long shot, but this article was added as a source to John Tantillo in a 2008 edit. Pinging Lulugo, who added it (but hasn't edited in a decade), just in case... --Usernameunique (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bookku: Requested via Michigan eLibrary. Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Booku: Please send me an email. (I have not had time to scan this yet and will not for another couple of days, but I might as well get your email now; if you haven't received anything by Wednesday, please nudge me.) Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Correcting spelling of Bookku and re-signing to trigger notification. Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bookku: Scanned, please send me an email. Also, while I have a book of these articles, would you be interested in the articles: "Influences of Irrational Beliefs and Expectancy of Success on Frustration Tolerance" or "Affective Consequences of Irrational Cognitions"? Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bookku:   Sent. Please let me know when you respond to my question. Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Compassionate727: I am sorry, since being busy on Women's day related articles my communication seemed to have remained bit unclear, while doing my multi tasking.

Now I have responded to your question and I am very much looking forward to other supportive ref sources. It is very nice of you. Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku: Not to worry! I wasn't very clear about why I was suggesting them, either.   Sent both, along with the tables of contents in case you want anything else. Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Compassionate727: Many many thanks, I just browsed them and I feel mostly I can use them. As such whatever good refs come my way I tend to use that slows down my speed a bit but I do cover up topics over a period of time. Around after International Women's day for couple of weeks articles about Aurat March in Pakistan, there after I will return back to Draft:Irrational beliefs which is also my top priority. Thanks and warm regards. Bookku (talk) 04:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gazal world and Usernameunique: Regretting for delay from my side to respond here, it seems lately I have added too many topics in my plate and getting delayed in my communications. I would like to sincerely thank both of you for your valuable help. Warm regards. Bookku (talk) 04:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Resolved}}

Article from 1984

Davey, Cyril J. (1984). "The Junior Church: Stories of Hymns XXVI. Christians, Awake, salute the happy morn". The Expository Times. 96 (2). doi:10.1177/001452468409600205.

For Christians, awake! salute the happy morn

Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomCanadian:   Sent via email. DanCherek (talk) 04:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Oh well, less useful information than I thought. But thanks for the very prompt response. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{resolved}}