Talk:We Interrupt This Program/GA1

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Filmgoer (talk | contribs) at 16:16, 4 September 2021 (Added notes; on hold.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • "working out or training, or spending time with a dog" – double "or" so rephrase
  • Remove the comma after "supporting roles in the MCU films".
  • Remove the comma after "some welcome backstory" (see RT consensus).
  • Remove the commas after "fan theories about the series" and "Park and Dennings".
  • There are a few more reviews at RT. Try adding them with WP:RECEPTION.
  • Mark references from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
  • The WrapTheWrap (for consistency throughout Wikipedia)
  • Be consistent with Comicbook.com or ComicBook.com.
  • Be consistent with Art of VFX or The Art of VFX.
  • Wikilink Dave Itzkoff, Justin Warner. and Megan McDonnell in the citations they are credited in.
  • Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed