Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L33t (programming language)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:53, 24 October 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 03:53, 24 October 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. JERRY talk contribs 23:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- L33t (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Looks like insufficiently notable "programming language." Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See previous debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages the result was delete. --Salix alba (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Esoteric_programming_language#Examples or very weak delete--Sin Harvest (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Its not particularly notable, but I dont think its not notable either RogueNinjatalk 11:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete not particularly interesting in computer sense as a Brainfunk derivative. Does not seem to beet WP:RS. --Salix alba (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No independent sources to establish notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.