Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Arbitration Committee noticeboard
Use this page to contact the Arbitration Committee regarding uncertainties about interpretation of Arbitration Committee decisions, questions regarding procedure and other matters. This page was created on February 20, 2005 so will not be fully operational until members of the Arbitration Committee are actively monitoring it.
Please see the edit history talk:requests for arbitration/Xed. On 22:10 25 Feb 2005 I submitted the following: [1]. However, as soon as I submitted it I regretted it -- and immediately (22:11 25 Feb 2005) rolled back my own edit: [2]. Since that time Xed has twice reverted my rollback. It seems to me that if I place a comment on the talk page, I have a right to withdraw it -- especially if I do it immediately, before anyone has responded or added to my comment. My intention was to roll back my edit before anyone would have a chance even to read it. For Xed to continue to resurrect the comment that I deleted immediately after submitting it misrepresents me. I feel silly considering the prospect of a revert war in which all I want to do is delete something I myself wrote. Slrubenstein | Talk 21:06, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I have responded on that page - summary: stop it, both of you. -- sannse (talk) 15:23, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I once again deleted the passage I wrote and immediately deleted. If in the past I also reverted anything Xed wrote, it was unintentional, I regret it, and I have tried not to do it this time.
Concerning the accusation that I have persisted in attacks, there is one thing that Xed and members of the ArbCom do not seem to understand. When I mention my having called Xed a moron -- meaning, that he has a cognitive deficit [3] it was in the context of explaining why I had said it and expressing my regret that I had said it while admitting that I had made a personal attack in the past. This was not intended to be a "new" personal attack, just an admission of an old one. If there is anything in my wording that suggests otherwise, I regret it and would change it. As to the other element (concerning a personality disorder), I do not consider this an attack and did not want it to be interpreted as an attack -- but if that is how the ArbCom understands it, so be it. Slrubenstein | Talk 21:39, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)