Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational and Statistical Genetics
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Computational and Statistical Genetics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- It seems to be a dupe of Bioinformatics, Computational biology, and/or Computational genomics.
- The latter two are the only mainspace articles that link to it.
- The text is virtually unchanged from its original writing in 2013 and requires considerable work.
- Even if re-written, I don't see benefit in preserving/merging/copying/reusing the text elsewhere.
- The talk page has one edit, where a reviewer appraised it as C-class.
- Both the author and reviewer are retired, so I have not attempted to reach them.
We have a consensus on WikiProject Molecular Biology to delete without attempting to merge its content. --Xarm Endris (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. TartarTorte 15:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Computational genetics and statistical genetics are somewhat overlapping but separate fields and I see no evidence in a search that "Computational and Statistical Genetics" is an interdisciplinary field notable independent of the component fields. It seems to fail notability and is an unlikely search term. Hence delete. --
{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk}
18:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC) - Delete. As Mark viking above and per my post on WikiProject Mol Biol, delete IMO given the overlap with computational genomics. Amkilpatrick (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Sadly not much that is high enough quality to merge into Computational Genomics (mainly referencing and language issues). Normally I'd recomment just coverting to a redirect, but the title is so obscure and pageviews so low that a redirect isn't even particularly useful. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 06:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)