Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/7 Notes to Infinity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

7 Notes to Infinity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find it much notable and also looks like a G11 Yasht101 07:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep : I think I can help get sources. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Best of luck to Rsrikanth05. The article was sent to AFd just two minutes after it was created, with cleanup tags added eight minutes after nomination.[1] So, I just performed some cleanup for style and format,[2] but was myself unable to find suitable sources. It may be that the article is premature. However, if not enough sourcing is found to merit a separate article, perhaps it can be redirected to the director's article where it might at least be mentioned. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do have a Highbeam account now, perhaps I might be able to get more than Google. But maybe, if needed we could redirect it to Shrenik Rao if I'm unable to get anything. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Created a bit too early. Iv no doubt it will be recreated once notability is established, delete for now. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 07:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It really is too soon for this one. Best of luck to those involved in the show. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - After source searching, this topic currently appears to fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline WP:GNG for inclusion in the encyclopedia. No prejudice toward recreation if the topic receives significant coverage in reliable sources in the future. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.