Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypercoding
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:26, 18 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 14:26, 18 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism of dubious notability, possible copy:vio Artw 20:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "Programming that has evolved a superior species of humankind - Programmers." Always nice to be flattered, isn't it? But, unfortunately: Delete per nom. Possibly an A1, no context indicated? Tevildo 20:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism and original research. Recury 20:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism, original research, crystal ball, NPOV--Nick Y. 21:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.