Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taj, An Object Oriented Operating System
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:11, 19 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 05:11, 19 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Insignificant toy operating system that no one except its author uses. Also most of the text (written in unencyclopedic style) is taken verbatim from author's website [1] with unknown copyright status. Delete. jni 06:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All external links point to one site, most likely operated by the author of the article (the names are identical.) Furthermore, the only content on the site the links point to is the exact same as that in the article. tmopkisn tlka 06:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above. Seems to be an advertisement as well. Kalani [talk] 07:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:COPYVIO potential, WP:NOT an ad service, not encyclopaedic, WP:PROD and WP:NN. Did I miss anything? Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 01:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per above, this is non-notable in every sense of the term and it reads exactly like an advertisement. (Probably because the text of it was taken directly from the author's site that promotes the OS.) The technical explanation is poor as well, and makes unfounded claims about Linux. I'm pretty sure this is WP:POV too. Going for a record, I guess. syphonbyte 02:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'd even toss in WP:V to make the complete package. :-p Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )
- Delete nobody has mentioned WP:VANITY yet. Phr (talk) 11:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Its of good use.It gives an insight of Object Oriented Operating System.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.