Lonely runner conjecture

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ovinus (talk | contribs) at 06:00, 3 May 2022 (tweaks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Unsolved problem in mathematics
Is the lonely runner conjecture true for every number of runners?

In number theory, the lonely runner conjecture is a conjecture about the long-term behavior of runners on a circular track. It states that runners, with nonzero constant speeds all distinct from one another, will each be lonely at some time—at least units away from all others.

The conjecture was first posed in 1967 by German mathematician Jörg M. Wills, in purely number-theoretic terms; its illustrative and now-popular formulation dates to 1998. The conjecture is known to be true for 7 runners or less, but remains unsolved in the general case. Implications of the conjecture include solutions to view obstruction problems and bounds on the chromatic number of certain graphs.

Formulation

 
Example of a case of the conjecture with 6 runners

Consider   runners on a circular track of unit length. At the initial time  , all runners are at the same position and start to run; the runners' speeds are constant and all distinct. A runner is said to be lonely at time   if they are at a distance (measured along the circle) of at least   from every other runner. The lonely runner conjecture states that each runner is lonely at some time, no matter the choice of speeds.[1]

This visual formulation of the conjecture was first published in 1998.[2] In many formulations, including the original by Jörg M. Wills,[3] the runner to be lonely is fixed at 0 (with zero speed), and therefore   other runners are considered.[a] The conjecture then states that, for any collection   of distinct speeds, there exists   such that   where   denotes the fractional part of  .[5] Wills' conjecture was part of his work in Diophantine approximation.[6]

Implications

 
Squares of side length   placed at every half-integer coordinate in the positive quadrant obstruct any ray from the origin in that direction. Any smaller side length will leave small gaps.

Suppose   is a closed convex body in   ( ) containing the origin, and infinitely many copies scaled by some factor   are placed at points at nonnegative half-integer coordinates. The view-obstruction problem for   asks for the minimum   for which any ray from the origin into the positive orthant hits at least one copy of  . Cusick (1973) made an independent formulation of the lonely runner conjecture in this context. The conjecture implies that if   is a unit n-hypercube centered at the origin, then the solution is  .[7] For example,  , as shown.

In graph theory, a distance graph   on the vertex set   of integers, and some finite set   of positive integers, has an edge between   if and only if  . For example, if  , every consecutive pair of even integers, and of odd integers, is adjacent, all together forming two connected components. The lonely runner conjecture implies that if  , the chromatic number of the distance graph is at most  .[8]

Given an directed graph  , a nowhere-zero flow network on   associates a positive value   to each edge  , such that the flow outward from each node is equal to the flow inward. If   is further restricted to positive integers, the lonely runner conjecture implies that, if   attains at most   different values, then it takes on at least one value in  . This result was proven for   with separate methods, and because the smaller cases of the lonely runner conjecture are settled, the full theorem is proven.[9]

Known results

Let the gap of loneliness[10]   denote the smallest of the maximal gaps attained across all cases for   runners. If correct, the upper bound   is sharp. For example, if the lonely runner is fixed and speeds   are chosen, then there is no time at which the lonely runner is strictly more than   units away from all others.[b] Alternatively, this conclusion is a corollary of the Dirichlet approximation theorem. A simple lower bound   may be obtained via a covering argument.[11]

The conjecture can be reduced to restricting the runners' speeds to positive integers: If the conjecture is true for   runners with integer speeds, it is true for   numbers with real speeds.[12]

Tighter bounds

Slight improvements on the lower bound   are known. Chen & Cusick (1999) showed for   that if   is prime, then  , and if   is prime, then  . Perarnau & Serra (2016) showed unconditionally for sufficiently large   that  

Tao (2018) proved the current best known asymptotic result: for sufficiently large  ,   for a some constant  . He also showed that the full conjecture is implied by proving the conjecture for integer speeds of size   (see big O notation). This implication theoretically allows proving the conjecture for a given   by checking a finite number of cases, but the number of cases grows too quickly.[13]

The conjecture has been proven under specific assumptions on the runners' speeds. If   and   then the minimum gap of loneliness is  . In other words, the conjecture holds true for   if the speeds grow quickly enough.[14] A slightly stronger result for   only requires a similar assumption on the first   speeds.[13] In a similar fashion but unconditionally on  , the conjecture is true if  .[15]

For specific n

The conjecture is true for   runners. The proofs for   are elementary; the   case was established in 1972.[16] The  ,  , and   cases were settled in 1984, 2001 and 2008, respectively. The first proof for   was computer-assisted. All have since been proved with elementary methods.[17]

For some  , there exist sporadic examples with a maximum separation of   besides the example of   given above.[5] For  , the only other example is   (omitting the stationary runner), where   is an arbitrary scaling factor; for   the only example is  ; and for   the only example is  .[18] All solutions for   are known through exhaustive computer search, and there exists an explicit infinite family of extremal examples.[19]

Kravitz (2021) formulated a sharper version of the conjecture that addresses near-equality cases. More specifically, he conjectures that for a given set of speeds  , either   for some positive integer  , or  , where   is the gap of loneliness. He confirmed this conjecture for   and a few special cases.

Other results

A much stronger result exists for randomly chosen speeds: if   and   is fixed and the speeds are chosen uniformly at random from  , then   as  . In other words, runners with random speeds are likely at some point to be "very lonely"—nearly   units from the nearest other runner.[20] The full conjecture is true if "loneliness" is replaced with "almost aloneness", meaning at most one other runner is within   of a given runner.[21] The conjecture has been generalized to an analog in algebraic function fields.[22]

Notes and references

Notes

  1. ^ Some authors use the convention that   is the number of non-stationary runners, and thus the conjecture is that the gap of loneliness is at most  .[4]
  2. ^ For the sake of contradiction, suppose there exists   such that   for all  . By the pigeonhole principle, there exist distinct   and   such that   But   for some  , so either   or  , a contradiction.[5]

Citations

Works cited