Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of layout engines (CSS)

Comparison of layout engines (CSS)

This is not appropriate content for wikipedia. It is WP:OR, and lacks WP:RS. Bug lists of this nature have no place here. It is impossible to provide reliable sources for the claims.

Delete - there are plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job of describing this kind of thing. Nssdfdsfds 13:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If there are "plenty of third-party sites doing a much better job [...]", why don't you list them so they provide as WP:RS? I dispute this argument as being contradictory. For the other part of the quote, see below. --Grey 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is not a "bug list". This article seeks to give an overview over which parts of the specifications are supported by each browser and if not, say so and provide a source detailing the problem. This is not OR. Sources are provided for the most part, and if not, should be added. So instead of deleting the article, we should add sources and remove parts that are OR. --Grey 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - See the reasons why Comparison of web browsers was not deleted in the debate and on its talk page. Comparisons therefore are not forbidden on Wikipedia and imho should be kept. --Grey 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Grey and precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of web browsers. The article should be better sourced, but is most certainly not devoid of reliable sources. -- Black Falcon 22:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]