Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIIG Problem Solving Method

BIIG Problem Solving Method

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

BIIG Problem Solving Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable concept. Only WP:PRIMARY sources are available. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. --JBL (talk) 19:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "academic" source is published in a predatory journal. Also the whole article isn't even WP:NPOV. Therefore delete. 0xDeadbeef→∞ 15:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a promotional article. 2601:647:5800:4D2:9DA1:D3F5:F6BF:A61C (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vanispamcruftisement. XOR'easter (talk) 01:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete --Noman☆ (Talk) 17:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, predatory-journal source, fails WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The references are an article in a journal that is predatory, a churnalism-style blurb by the author of said article, and a piece that doesn't even discuss the topic specifically. Spam masquerading as an article. Look at the article creator's contributions, it's highly likely that they are Chaitanya Hiremath and that this is nothing more than self-promotion. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]