Husond

Joined 4 July 2006
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alpertunga5000 (talk | contribs) at 02:12, 2 March 2007 (user Davo88). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 18 years ago by AdilBaguirov in topic user Davo88


Archive

Archives
Húsönd creates an archive for every 50 messages


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


RE:Vandal Fight

Sorry, I saw the two other warnings, but I failed to look at the timestamps. I will do better in the future, but since I thought that he vandalized the page twice in February, a level 3 warning seemed inappropriate. Again, Sorry. ~Steptrip 01:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Motorman being blocked

Motorman is a good friend of mine and after seeing him having vandalised my talk, I'm glad you blocked him. It's all he ever seems to do. It must amuse him. Somebody needed to take action. He was really apologetic to me about it. Can you unblock him soon, but only when he has served a suitable punishment. Soopa hoops77

I think motorman really deserves another chance now. Thankyou for blocking him though, its good of you to do the right thing!! -- Zesty Prospect 17:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC) User:Zesty ProspectReply

In reply to "Warnings

  • Will do, most of the time I try to give out warnings (i'm not sure if you can see "talk pages" in my contributions, but if you can you can check and see I try to, especially for IPs), with a link to the article in question (though not the actual vandalism-article comparison, just the present article), but if the vandalism isn't incredibly serious or if I'm tired I sometimes forget. But I will try to force myself to do so more often in the future! Thanks for the friendly reminder though. IrishPearl 03:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reply

Husond,

Some kind of protection might be useful.

The version of my user page should be the one as of 17 November 2006.

Thanks, Nealjking 05:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

IP problem

Hello, Mr. Husond

This IP (Special:Contributions/202.79.18.2) (User talk:202.79.18.2) indicates some warning messages on its talk page. From my Internet connection status tab my IP is 10.0.7.101 . But in wikipedia, my contribution history shows this IP 202.79.18.2 while I contributing without logged in. I didn't vandalised any page before.This IP 202.79.18.2 engaged in editing with some Articles Where I haven't even visited. What's the problem? Will it create problems in future? Is someone using this IP from another PC?--NAHID 22:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)--NAHID 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

P.S.

I volunteered on 15th september,2006. But this IP first started editing on 4th september, 2006 (from its talk page). If this IP is blocked(i.e. for further vandalism) then my account is also likely to be blocked??

P.S.2

Can I use this infobox

IPThis user's IP is 10.0.7.101.

instead of 202.79.18.2 on my user page. Or Should I avoid this IP infobox for avoiding further confusion. How Can I rectify this? Thank you --NAHID 16:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

IP 2

But if this IP is blocked (User talk:202.79.18.2, it has just vandalised Scholastica school) then would I be able to contribute without logged in? And in Infobox which IP should I write (10.0.7.101 or 202.79.18.2) ?Thanks --NAHID 19:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Admin coaching

Hi, I recently listed myself at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests. Since you are listed as available for coaching, I decided to ping you directly. I have been here 9 months and like requested templates, vandal wacking and some of the more policy-related areas. Looking to find my weak spots or help out in places I might have missed. I put in a co-request with Terence Ong. —Dgiest c 19:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Request for page protection - Rightmove

You've recently declined declined my request for semi-protection of the Rightmove article; I was wondering what further options can be undertaken to stop the repetitive vandalism by user of that specific ISP? Thanks. -- Ratarsed 22:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

Serves you right for giving me internal errors while trying to clear out RFPP :) – riana_dzasta 02:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request for clarification, or to fix SIAS International University page

Hello. I greatly appreciate you locking the SIAS International University Page. There are several individuals who are removing factual posts from the page, as well as editing the talk page. They work for www.plugintoyours.com who is ONLY recruiter for SIAS. They are a very right wing religous group and do not want that information out there. As such, they keep removing any and all posts concering their group. or they edit out their name, or just blank issues. I appreciate you locking the page, but I would like to request that the last revision you made (the change from www.plugintoyours.com/recruitment to the form that is there be fixed.) The people responsbile have found an old form that is no longer used by the unviersity, and cannot be submitted to and put it there to hide. I greatly appreciate any and all help you have given. Will Jones Never underestimate the power of human stupidity. 09:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Declined I protected the page precisely to halt persistent disruption/spam.--Húsönd 17:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move

Hi, I moved Ostsiedlung to Settlement in the East according to WP:UE, but then I realized there was a consensus keeping it on Ostsiedlung, but now I am unable to fix that, could you please move it back to Ostsiedlung according to consensus please ? [1]. ≈Tulkolahten≈≈talk≈ 12:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

Thank you for the award! It was a superb ending to a long day of tough translations at work :D -Yupik 19:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

user Davo88

User:Davo88 has recently surfaced, and is making radical changes, reverts to several pages -- generally with obscure or sometimes no explanation at all. Consider this revert, where he removes fully sourced, academic, authoritative and verifiable quotes, and does not even bother to provide an Edit Summary: [2] (I have left extensive comments on that Talk page [3]). He did the same on a different page [4], despite my Edit Summary that has re-iterated the link to Encyclopedia Iranica (more was left on the Talk page itself). --AdilBaguirov 02:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply