Talk:Polish cochineal

Polish cochineal has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}.

Polish cochineal received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Arthropods Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

An entry from Polish cochineal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 4 February, 2007.

Wikipedia

GA Passed

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a very well written article, and the research is impressive. It must have taken a lot of effort to run down the obscure (but good) sources. One thing I would suggest is an inline citation for the source on the life cycle information.Rusty Cashman 19:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply