Unity of science

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Biogeographist (talk | contribs) at 18:44, 21 January 2023 (added fr language parameter to Piaget book). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The unity of science is a thesis in philosophy of science that says that all the sciences form a unified whole. It was proposed by Ludwig von Bertalanffy in "General System Theory: A New Approach to Unity of Science" (1951)[1] and by Paul Oppenheim and Hilary Putnam in "Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis" (1958).[2] It has been opposed by Jerry Fodor in "Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis)" (1974),[3] by Paul Feyerabend in Against Method (1975) and later works,[4][5] and by John Dupré in "The Disunity of Science" (1983)[6] and The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science (1993).[7]

Jean Piaget suggested, in his 1918 book Recherche[8] and later books, that the unity of science can be considered in terms of a circle of the sciences, where logic is the foundation for mathematics, which is the foundation for mechanics and physics, and physics is the foundation for chemistry, which is the foundation for biology, which is the foundation for sociology, the moral sciences, psychology, and the theory of knowledge, and the theory of knowledge is based on logic, completing the circle,[9] without implying that any science could be reduced to any other.[10]

See also

Notes

References

Further reading